{"title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition allows a reliable proliferation assessment of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors","authors":"Yoshihide Nanno, Hirochika Toyama, Kazuyuki Nagai, Dongha Lee, Yuichiro Uchida, Jun Ishida, Takeshi Takahara, Ippei Matsumoto, Etsuro Hatano, Takumi Fukumoto","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence regarding the reliability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for assessing histological proliferation and WHO grading of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed data from 122 patients with small PanNETs who underwent EUS-TA followed by surgical resection between 2006 and 2022. We compared the histopathological proliferation assessment and WHO grading between preoperative EUS-TA and surgical definitive specimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 122 patients with small PanNETs (80% with surgical definitive WHO grade G1 and 20% with G2), EUS-TA histology identified neuroendocrine tumors in 101 (83%) patients and provided WHO grading in 85 (70%) patients. Histopathological WHO grading for EUS-TA was concordant with surgical definitive grading in 86% (73/85) of cases, overstaged in 4% (3/85), and understaged in 11% (9/85). Moderate, severe, and fatal adverse events associated with EUS-TA, as classified by the lexicon, were not reported in this cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EUS-TA is a reliable method for assessing histopathological proliferation and WHO grading of small PanNETs. However, grading discordance may occur, and a risk–benefit evaluation on a per-patient basis is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 2","pages":"339-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12871","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Evidence regarding the reliability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for assessing histological proliferation and WHO grading of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is limited.
Methods
In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed data from 122 patients with small PanNETs who underwent EUS-TA followed by surgical resection between 2006 and 2022. We compared the histopathological proliferation assessment and WHO grading between preoperative EUS-TA and surgical definitive specimens.
Results
Among the 122 patients with small PanNETs (80% with surgical definitive WHO grade G1 and 20% with G2), EUS-TA histology identified neuroendocrine tumors in 101 (83%) patients and provided WHO grading in 85 (70%) patients. Histopathological WHO grading for EUS-TA was concordant with surgical definitive grading in 86% (73/85) of cases, overstaged in 4% (3/85), and understaged in 11% (9/85). Moderate, severe, and fatal adverse events associated with EUS-TA, as classified by the lexicon, were not reported in this cohort.
Conclusion
EUS-TA is a reliable method for assessing histopathological proliferation and WHO grading of small PanNETs. However, grading discordance may occur, and a risk–benefit evaluation on a per-patient basis is recommended.