Subgrouping People With Acute Low Back Pain Based on Psychological, Sensory, and Motor Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/ejp.70006
Patrick Ippersiel, Claudia Côté-Picard, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Hugo Massé-Alarie
{"title":"Subgrouping People With Acute Low Back Pain Based on Psychological, Sensory, and Motor Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Patrick Ippersiel,&nbsp;Claudia Côté-Picard,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Roy,&nbsp;Hugo Massé-Alarie","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clustering helps identify patient subgroups with similar biopsychosocial profiles in acute low-back pain (LBP). Motor factors are common treatment targets and are associated with disability but have not been included in acute LBP cluster development. This study aimed to identify subgroups of individuals with acute LBP based on motor, sensory and psychological characteristics and to compare these subgroups regarding clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-nine participants with acute LBP were recruited, and motor (bending range of motion [ROM], flexion relaxation), pain sensitivity (pressure-pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain) and psychological factors (pain catastrophising, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy) were measured, along with pain, disability and demographics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Principal component analysis accounted for 66.03% of the variance. Four component scores were entered in a hierarchical linear clustering model, deriving 3 subgroups (‘mild features’ <i>n</i> = 39, ‘sensorimotor’ <i>n</i> = 35 and ‘psychomotor’ <i>n</i> = 25). Between-cluster comparisons revealed significant differences in motor, sensory and psychological variables (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Sensorimotor and psychomotor clusters had higher flexion–relaxation ratios (mean difference: &gt; 0.2), greater disability (mean difference: &gt; 7/100) and smaller ROM (mean difference: 7 cm) compared to the ‘mild’ group. The sensorimotor cluster mostly exhibited higher temporal summation of pain (mean difference: &gt; 1.3/10) and lower pressure-pain thresholds (mean difference: &gt; 1.2 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>) than ‘mild’ and psychomotor clusters. The psychomotor cluster showed higher kinesiophobia (mean difference: &gt; 6/44) and pain catastrophising (mean difference: &gt; 12/52) than ‘mild’ and sensorimotor groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings indicate 3 subgroups, suggesting that motor factors may add granularity to acute LBP clusters. Stratified care based on these subgroups may help refine treatment pathways for acute LBP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>Including motor factors in cluster development adds a clinically relevant metric to describe people with acute LBP and generates insight into underlying mechanisms of motor adaptation. Longitudinal testing is required to see if these subgroups are differentially related to short- and long-term pain and disability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clustering helps identify patient subgroups with similar biopsychosocial profiles in acute low-back pain (LBP). Motor factors are common treatment targets and are associated with disability but have not been included in acute LBP cluster development. This study aimed to identify subgroups of individuals with acute LBP based on motor, sensory and psychological characteristics and to compare these subgroups regarding clinical outcomes.

Methods

Ninety-nine participants with acute LBP were recruited, and motor (bending range of motion [ROM], flexion relaxation), pain sensitivity (pressure-pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain) and psychological factors (pain catastrophising, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy) were measured, along with pain, disability and demographics.

Results

Principal component analysis accounted for 66.03% of the variance. Four component scores were entered in a hierarchical linear clustering model, deriving 3 subgroups (‘mild features’ n = 39, ‘sensorimotor’ n = 35 and ‘psychomotor’ n = 25). Between-cluster comparisons revealed significant differences in motor, sensory and psychological variables (p < 0.05). Sensorimotor and psychomotor clusters had higher flexion–relaxation ratios (mean difference: > 0.2), greater disability (mean difference: > 7/100) and smaller ROM (mean difference: 7 cm) compared to the ‘mild’ group. The sensorimotor cluster mostly exhibited higher temporal summation of pain (mean difference: > 1.3/10) and lower pressure-pain thresholds (mean difference: > 1.2 kg/cm2) than ‘mild’ and psychomotor clusters. The psychomotor cluster showed higher kinesiophobia (mean difference: > 6/44) and pain catastrophising (mean difference: > 12/52) than ‘mild’ and sensorimotor groups.

Conclusion

Findings indicate 3 subgroups, suggesting that motor factors may add granularity to acute LBP clusters. Stratified care based on these subgroups may help refine treatment pathways for acute LBP.

Significance Statement

Including motor factors in cluster development adds a clinically relevant metric to describe people with acute LBP and generates insight into underlying mechanisms of motor adaptation. Longitudinal testing is required to see if these subgroups are differentially related to short- and long-term pain and disability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
Painful Mondays: Exploring Weekly Sleep Variations and Pain Perception in Healthy Women—An Experimental Study Subgrouping People With Acute Low Back Pain Based on Psychological, Sensory, and Motor Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Child Pain-Related Injustice Appraisals: A Discriminant Content Analysis Study Chronic Postsurgical Pain Raises Risk of Dementia The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1