Examining the connection between position-based power and social status across 70 cultures

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1111/bjso.12871
Arkadiusz Wasiel, Maciej R. Górski, Michael Harris Bond, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Plamen Akaliyski, Grace Akello, Joonha Park, Mohsen Joshanloo, Boris Sokolov, M. Azhar Hussain, Liman Man Wai Li, Mateusz Olechowski, Vivian L. Vignoles, Farida Guemaz, Mahmoud Boussena, Md. Reza-A Rabby, Ayu Okvitawanli, Katarzyna Myślińska-Szarek, Brian W. Haas, Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez, Olha Vlasenko, Vivian Miu-Chi Lun, Nur Amali Aminnuddin, İdil Işık, Oumar Barry, Márta Fülöp, David Igbokwe, Mladen Adamovic, Ragna Benedikta Garðarsdóttir, Natalia Soboleva, Julien Teyssier, Fumiko Kano Glückstad, Adil Samekin, Charity Akotia, Marwan Al-Zoubi, Laura Andrade, Petra Anić, Rasmata Bakyono-Nabaloum, Arno Baltin, Vlad Costin, Patrick Denoux, Alejandra Domínguez Espinosa, Agustin Espinosa, Vladimer Gamsakhurdia, Magdalena Garvanova, Alin Gavreliuc, Biljana Gjoneska, Eric Raymond Igou, Naved Iqbal, Nuha Iter, Natalia Kascakova, Elmina Kazimzade, Maria Kluzowicz, Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska, Nicole Kronberger, Mary Anne Lauri, Hannah Lee, Arina Malyonova, Fridanna Maricchiolo, Linda Mohammed, Fatma Mokadem, Magdalena Mosanya, Oriana Mosca, Elke Murdock, Martin Nader, Karolina Nowak, Danielle Ochoa, Zoran Pavlović, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Ewelina Purc, Muhammad Rizwan, Ana Maria Rocha, Heyla Selim, Rosita Sobhie, Moritz Streng, Chien-Ru Sun, Morten Tønnessen, Claudio Torres, Kiều Thị Thanh Trà, Vladimir Turjačanin, Wijnand van Tilburg, Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Jorge Vergara-Morales, Cai Xing, Belkacem Yakhlef, Jae-Won Yang, Eric Kenson Yau, June Chun Yeung, John Zelenski, Kuba Krys
{"title":"Examining the connection between position-based power and social status across 70 cultures","authors":"Arkadiusz Wasiel,&nbsp;Maciej R. Górski,&nbsp;Michael Harris Bond,&nbsp;Victoria Wai Lan Yeung,&nbsp;Plamen Akaliyski,&nbsp;Grace Akello,&nbsp;Joonha Park,&nbsp;Mohsen Joshanloo,&nbsp;Boris Sokolov,&nbsp;M. Azhar Hussain,&nbsp;Liman Man Wai Li,&nbsp;Mateusz Olechowski,&nbsp;Vivian L. Vignoles,&nbsp;Farida Guemaz,&nbsp;Mahmoud Boussena,&nbsp;Md. Reza-A Rabby,&nbsp;Ayu Okvitawanli,&nbsp;Katarzyna Myślińska-Szarek,&nbsp;Brian W. Haas,&nbsp;Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Olha Vlasenko,&nbsp;Vivian Miu-Chi Lun,&nbsp;Nur Amali Aminnuddin,&nbsp;İdil Işık,&nbsp;Oumar Barry,&nbsp;Márta Fülöp,&nbsp;David Igbokwe,&nbsp;Mladen Adamovic,&nbsp;Ragna Benedikta Garðarsdóttir,&nbsp;Natalia Soboleva,&nbsp;Julien Teyssier,&nbsp;Fumiko Kano Glückstad,&nbsp;Adil Samekin,&nbsp;Charity Akotia,&nbsp;Marwan Al-Zoubi,&nbsp;Laura Andrade,&nbsp;Petra Anić,&nbsp;Rasmata Bakyono-Nabaloum,&nbsp;Arno Baltin,&nbsp;Vlad Costin,&nbsp;Patrick Denoux,&nbsp;Alejandra Domínguez Espinosa,&nbsp;Agustin Espinosa,&nbsp;Vladimer Gamsakhurdia,&nbsp;Magdalena Garvanova,&nbsp;Alin Gavreliuc,&nbsp;Biljana Gjoneska,&nbsp;Eric Raymond Igou,&nbsp;Naved Iqbal,&nbsp;Nuha Iter,&nbsp;Natalia Kascakova,&nbsp;Elmina Kazimzade,&nbsp;Maria Kluzowicz,&nbsp;Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska,&nbsp;Nicole Kronberger,&nbsp;Mary Anne Lauri,&nbsp;Hannah Lee,&nbsp;Arina Malyonova,&nbsp;Fridanna Maricchiolo,&nbsp;Linda Mohammed,&nbsp;Fatma Mokadem,&nbsp;Magdalena Mosanya,&nbsp;Oriana Mosca,&nbsp;Elke Murdock,&nbsp;Martin Nader,&nbsp;Karolina Nowak,&nbsp;Danielle Ochoa,&nbsp;Zoran Pavlović,&nbsp;Iva Poláčková Šolcová,&nbsp;Ewelina Purc,&nbsp;Muhammad Rizwan,&nbsp;Ana Maria Rocha,&nbsp;Heyla Selim,&nbsp;Rosita Sobhie,&nbsp;Moritz Streng,&nbsp;Chien-Ru Sun,&nbsp;Morten Tønnessen,&nbsp;Claudio Torres,&nbsp;Kiều Thị Thanh Trà,&nbsp;Vladimir Turjačanin,&nbsp;Wijnand van Tilburg,&nbsp;Christin-Melanie Vauclair,&nbsp;Jorge Vergara-Morales,&nbsp;Cai Xing,&nbsp;Belkacem Yakhlef,&nbsp;Jae-Won Yang,&nbsp;Eric Kenson Yau,&nbsp;June Chun Yeung,&nbsp;John Zelenski,&nbsp;Kuba Krys","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Even in the most egalitarian societies, hierarchies of power and status shape social life. However, power and received status are not synonymous—individuals in positions of power may or may not be accorded the respect corresponding to their role. Using a cooperatively collected dataset from 18,096 participants across 70 cultures, we investigate, through a survey-based correlational design, when perceived position-based power (operationalized as influence and control) of various powerholders is associated with their elevated social status (operationalized as perceived respect and instrumental social value). We document that the positive link between power and status characterizes most cultural regions, except for WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and Post-Soviet regions. The strength of this association depends on individual and cultural factors. First, the perceived other-orientation of powerholders amplifies the positive link between perceived power and status. The perceived self-orientation of powerholders weakens this relationship. Second, among cultures characterized by low Self-Expression versus Harmony (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan), high Embeddedness (e.g., Senegal), and high Cultural Tightness (e.g., Malaysia), the association between power and status tends to be particularly strong. The results underline the importance of both individual perceptions and societal values in how position-based power relates to social status.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even in the most egalitarian societies, hierarchies of power and status shape social life. However, power and received status are not synonymous—individuals in positions of power may or may not be accorded the respect corresponding to their role. Using a cooperatively collected dataset from 18,096 participants across 70 cultures, we investigate, through a survey-based correlational design, when perceived position-based power (operationalized as influence and control) of various powerholders is associated with their elevated social status (operationalized as perceived respect and instrumental social value). We document that the positive link between power and status characterizes most cultural regions, except for WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and Post-Soviet regions. The strength of this association depends on individual and cultural factors. First, the perceived other-orientation of powerholders amplifies the positive link between perceived power and status. The perceived self-orientation of powerholders weakens this relationship. Second, among cultures characterized by low Self-Expression versus Harmony (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan), high Embeddedness (e.g., Senegal), and high Cultural Tightness (e.g., Malaysia), the association between power and status tends to be particularly strong. The results underline the importance of both individual perceptions and societal values in how position-based power relates to social status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究了70种文化中基于职位的权力与社会地位之间的关系
即使在最平等的社会里,权力和地位的等级也决定着社会生活。然而,权力和公认的地位并不是同义词——处于权力位置的个人可能会也可能不会得到与其角色相应的尊重。利用合作收集的来自70个文化的18096名参与者的数据集,我们通过基于调查的相关性设计,调查了不同权力持有者的感知位置权力(运作化为影响和控制)与他们的社会地位提升(运作化为感知的尊重和工具性社会价值)之间的关系。我们的研究表明,权力和地位之间的积极联系是大多数文化地区的特征,但WEIRD(西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕、民主)和后苏联地区除外。这种联系的强度取决于个人和文化因素。首先,权力持有者感知到的他者取向放大了感知到的权力与地位之间的积极联系。权力持有者的自我取向削弱了这种关系。其次,在自我表达与和谐相对较低的文化中(如韩国、台湾)、高度嵌入性(如塞内加尔)和高度文化紧密性(如马来西亚),权力和地位之间的联系往往特别强烈。研究结果强调了个人观念和社会价值观对基于地位的权力与社会地位之间关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.
期刊最新文献
Alcoholics anonymous and recovery in Türkiye: A qualitative study in the context of Social Identity Theory ‘A learning process that never ends’: How advantaged social justice activists negotiate privilege and activism within their identity Concern for future generations predicts costly present-day prosociality and extraordinary altruism: A case study of organ donorship. The differential effects of identification modes on suggestion-making behaviour. Understanding stigma consciousness: A multilevel analysis across diverse stigmatized groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1