Marta Prandelli, Valentina Rizzoli, Emiliano Tolusso
The United Nations Agenda 2030, inclusive of its 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs), serves as the global blueprint for sustainability for both present and future generations. Scientific research is entrusted with the responsibility of contributing by informing the current situation and future challenges in achieving the SDGs. This paper investigates the role of social psychology in contributing to the SDGs and the environmental, economic and social pillars of the UN Agenda. We analysed 4808 papers using Natural Language Processing to identify (i) the relevance of social psychology within the SDG-related literature and (ii) the current and potential contribution of social psychology to the SDGs. Results highlight that social psychology contributes to the SDGs by addressing typical social issues, primarily those related to health and gender, while noting its under-representation in some environmental and economic areas, despite social psychology well-established research on these topics. This paper introduces a novel approach for assessing the SDGs, fostering a critical reflection on the SDG framework and social psychology to guide less explored research paths. This approach could potentially enhance the evaluation and advancement of the 2030 Agenda, facilitating a deeper dialogue between the scientific community and policymakers, driving social change.
{"title":"The sustainable challenge: Where does social psychology stand in achieving the sustainable development goals?","authors":"Marta Prandelli, Valentina Rizzoli, Emiliano Tolusso","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Nations Agenda 2030, inclusive of its 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs), serves as the global blueprint for sustainability for both present and future generations. Scientific research is entrusted with the responsibility of contributing by informing the current situation and future challenges in achieving the SDGs. This paper investigates the role of social psychology in contributing to the SDGs and the environmental, economic and social pillars of the UN Agenda. We analysed 4808 papers using Natural Language Processing to identify (i) the relevance of social psychology within the SDG-related literature and (ii) the current and potential contribution of social psychology to the SDGs. Results highlight that social psychology contributes to the SDGs by addressing typical social issues, primarily those related to health and gender, while noting its under-representation in some environmental and economic areas, despite social psychology well-established research on these topics. This paper introduces a novel approach for assessing the SDGs, fostering a critical reflection on the SDG framework and social psychology to guide less explored research paths. This approach could potentially enhance the evaluation and advancement of the 2030 Agenda, facilitating a deeper dialogue between the scientific community and policymakers, driving social change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In response to the urgent global climate crisis, climate activism has risen as a potent force. Decision-making regarding climate collective action includes individuals' perceptions of the anticipated future existential risks of the climate crisis (risk of inaction) and present-day political risks of climate activism (risk of action). Our research, spanning four studies (two correlational surveys and two pre-registered experiments), focused on climate activism in Germany (N = 1027). We consistently showed that heightened politicized activist identification was associated with both confrontational and non-confrontational climate collective action across four studies. Furthermore, the anticipated existential climate risk was associated with non-confrontational climate action and present-day political risk with confrontational action. Politicized climate identity remained a robust predictor across different action tactics, while the content and temporality of risk (future existential vs. present-day political) in one's environment determined the transition between engagement in confrontational and non-confrontational climate action dynamically. Nevertheless, we did not find causal links between risk perceptions and collective action. We discuss our findings in line with ESIM (Elaborated Social Identity Model), and potential explanations for the lack of causal relationship and future directions for alternative methodologies and comprehensive conceptualization of risk perceptions are suggested.
{"title":"The horror of today and the terror of tomorrow: The role of future existential risks and present-day political risks in climate activism.","authors":"Mete Sefa Uysal, Nuria Martinez, Sara Vestergren","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to the urgent global climate crisis, climate activism has risen as a potent force. Decision-making regarding climate collective action includes individuals' perceptions of the anticipated future existential risks of the climate crisis (risk of inaction) and present-day political risks of climate activism (risk of action). Our research, spanning four studies (two correlational surveys and two pre-registered experiments), focused on climate activism in Germany (N = 1027). We consistently showed that heightened politicized activist identification was associated with both confrontational and non-confrontational climate collective action across four studies. Furthermore, the anticipated existential climate risk was associated with non-confrontational climate action and present-day political risk with confrontational action. Politicized climate identity remained a robust predictor across different action tactics, while the content and temporality of risk (future existential vs. present-day political) in one's environment determined the transition between engagement in confrontational and non-confrontational climate action dynamically. Nevertheless, we did not find causal links between risk perceptions and collective action. We discuss our findings in line with ESIM (Elaborated Social Identity Model), and potential explanations for the lack of causal relationship and future directions for alternative methodologies and comprehensive conceptualization of risk perceptions are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we posit that the 'global' status of the pandemic is not an essentialized feature of the crisis, but a product of social construction by political leaders. More specifically, we examine how political leaders of a superpower and a peripheral nation produce the pandemic's globality through crisis geographies from above and below. Utilizing a mixed methods framework, we analyse public speeches by Donald Trump of the United States and Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines through a critical approach to text analytics. Quantitatively, we found that besides mentioning their own homelands, Western countries featured more prominently in Trump's speeches while Asian neighbours were more salient in Duterte's speeches during the pandemic. However, the United States and China were consistently the most central in the crisis geographies of the pandemic of both speakers. Qualitatively, we further characterized the discourses surrounding these global pronouncements as: (a) collective reflexive positioning on the world stage, (b) charting zones of hope and (c) scapegoating zones of blame. Taken together, implications of this work are discussed in terms of understanding pandemic leadership in national and international contexts, recognizing its negotiated embeddedness in global structural hierarchies and enhancing critical approaches to geopolitical psychology.
{"title":"Crisis geographies from above and below: Constructing globality during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Joshua Uyheng, Cristina Jayme Montiel, Enrikko Sibayan","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we posit that the 'global' status of the pandemic is not an essentialized feature of the crisis, but a product of social construction by political leaders. More specifically, we examine how political leaders of a superpower and a peripheral nation produce the pandemic's globality through crisis geographies from above and below. Utilizing a mixed methods framework, we analyse public speeches by Donald Trump of the United States and Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines through a critical approach to text analytics. Quantitatively, we found that besides mentioning their own homelands, Western countries featured more prominently in Trump's speeches while Asian neighbours were more salient in Duterte's speeches during the pandemic. However, the United States and China were consistently the most central in the crisis geographies of the pandemic of both speakers. Qualitatively, we further characterized the discourses surrounding these global pronouncements as: (a) collective reflexive positioning on the world stage, (b) charting zones of hope and (c) scapegoating zones of blame. Taken together, implications of this work are discussed in terms of understanding pandemic leadership in national and international contexts, recognizing its negotiated embeddedness in global structural hierarchies and enhancing critical approaches to geopolitical psychology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christoph Klebl, Jolanda Jetten, Brock Bastian, Julia Lee Cunningham
Humanity is facing rapid declines in both biodiversity and cultural diversity. As effective conservation policies often require strong public support, it is critical to understand whether individuals view diversity loss through a moral lens and whether they value diversity for its own sake, independent from instrumental or individual-centric concerns. Across two studies (N = 796), we found that individuals assigned moral value to both biodiversity and cultural diversity. Individuals assigned greater moral value to animals, plants and - to a lesser extent - languages when diversity was threatened, compared to when it was not threatened, despite an equal number of entities at risk, and they were willing to sacrifice a large number of these entities to prevent a loss in diversity. Additionally, we found (N = 12,000) that a general concern for diversity underlies concern for both biodiversity and cultural diversity. These findings suggest that emphasizing the inherent value of diversity may be effective for increasing public support for conservation of diversity.
{"title":"Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued.","authors":"Christoph Klebl, Jolanda Jetten, Brock Bastian, Julia Lee Cunningham","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humanity is facing rapid declines in both biodiversity and cultural diversity. As effective conservation policies often require strong public support, it is critical to understand whether individuals view diversity loss through a moral lens and whether they value diversity for its own sake, independent from instrumental or individual-centric concerns. Across two studies (N = 796), we found that individuals assigned moral value to both biodiversity and cultural diversity. Individuals assigned greater moral value to animals, plants and - to a lesser extent - languages when diversity was threatened, compared to when it was not threatened, despite an equal number of entities at risk, and they were willing to sacrifice a large number of these entities to prevent a loss in diversity. Additionally, we found (N = 12,000) that a general concern for diversity underlies concern for both biodiversity and cultural diversity. These findings suggest that emphasizing the inherent value of diversity may be effective for increasing public support for conservation of diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Janine Bosak, Clara Kulich, Samantha C Paustian-Underdahl, Rachelle Borg Dingli
Contrary to expectations about solidarity and sisterhood between women, women managers sometimes distance themselves from junior women in the workplace when facing identity threat, that is, the feeling that one's social identity-such as race or gender-is devalued or undermined. For example, women managers might distance themselves from lower status junior women by seeing themselves as more masculine and career committed than their junior women colleagues. To advance our understanding of how to combat self-group distancing, the present research proposed and tested whether taking the perspective of junior women would attenuate these ingroup-distancing tendencies in women managers. Findings from a field study and an experimental study indicated that women managers reported greater self-distancing from junior women (on masculine trait perceptions) compared to women employees. As predicted, this effect was attenuated for women managers with high levels of perspective-taking (Study 1) and for women who were experimentally led to take the perspective of junior women (Study 2). For ratings of career commitment and support for affirmative actions, we did not replicate the self-ingroup distancing effect reported in the literature. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
{"title":"The role of perspective-taking in attenuating self-group distancing in women managers.","authors":"Janine Bosak, Clara Kulich, Samantha C Paustian-Underdahl, Rachelle Borg Dingli","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrary to expectations about solidarity and sisterhood between women, women managers sometimes distance themselves from junior women in the workplace when facing identity threat, that is, the feeling that one's social identity-such as race or gender-is devalued or undermined. For example, women managers might distance themselves from lower status junior women by seeing themselves as more masculine and career committed than their junior women colleagues. To advance our understanding of how to combat self-group distancing, the present research proposed and tested whether taking the perspective of junior women would attenuate these ingroup-distancing tendencies in women managers. Findings from a field study and an experimental study indicated that women managers reported greater self-distancing from junior women (on masculine trait perceptions) compared to women employees. As predicted, this effect was attenuated for women managers with high levels of perspective-taking (Study 1) and for women who were experimentally led to take the perspective of junior women (Study 2). For ratings of career commitment and support for affirmative actions, we did not replicate the self-ingroup distancing effect reported in the literature. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we critique the colonial conception of time and present alternative decolonial temporalities. We propose that the colonial conception of time, which is linear and scarcity centred, is limiting when it comes to the possibility of contextually theorizing trauma and healing. We offer two main arguments. The first argument explores the discourse around the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in South Africa. Focusing specifically on Winnie Madikizela and F. W De Klerk, we show that in their engagement with the TRC, the linear, scarcity-centred and gendered nature of colonial time was animated. The second argument extends the first argument by considering how temporality is 'captured' by colonialism to foreground and universalize Western subjectivities and sensibilities. We use what Derek Hook calls a psycho-societal-diagnostic framework in conjunction with Fanon to show how subjectivities are structured in post-apartheid South Africa. We then consider how this time-subjectivity relationship is enacted at a geopolitical level. The paper ends by considering decolonial temporalities as a way to 're-cognize' at a collective level. While the paper engages with a series of concepts and ideas, namely capitalism, politics of justice, gender and race, these are threaded by the concept of time.
在本文中,我们对殖民主义的时间概念进行了批判,并提出了另一种非殖民主义的时间性。我们认为,殖民主义的时间概念是线性的,以稀缺性为中心,这种概念限制了将创伤和愈合理论化的可能性。我们提出了两个主要论点。第一个论点探讨了南非真相与和解委员会(TRC)的相关论述。我们特别关注了温妮-马迪基泽拉(Winnie Madikizela)和F-W-德克勒克(F. W. De Klerk),表明在他们参与真相与和解委员会的过程中,殖民时代的线性、以稀缺性为中心和性别化的本质被激发了出来。第二个论点对第一个论点进行了延伸,考虑了时间性如何被殖民主义 "捕获",以凸显和普及西方的主体性和感性。我们将德里克-胡克(Derek Hook)所称的心理-社会诊断框架与法农结合起来,说明种族隔离后的南非是如何构建主体性的。然后,我们考虑这种时间-主体性关系是如何在地缘政治层面上形成的。最后,本文将非殖民化的时间性视为在集体层面 "重新认识 "的一种方式。本文涉及一系列概念和观点,即资本主义、正义政治、性别和种族,而这些概念和观点都以时间概念为线索。
{"title":"From colonial time to decolonial temporalities.","authors":"Thabolwethu Tema Maphosa, Refiloe Makama","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we critique the colonial conception of time and present alternative decolonial temporalities. We propose that the colonial conception of time, which is linear and scarcity centred, is limiting when it comes to the possibility of contextually theorizing trauma and healing. We offer two main arguments. The first argument explores the discourse around the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in South Africa. Focusing specifically on Winnie Madikizela and F. W De Klerk, we show that in their engagement with the TRC, the linear, scarcity-centred and gendered nature of colonial time was animated. The second argument extends the first argument by considering how temporality is 'captured' by colonialism to foreground and universalize Western subjectivities and sensibilities. We use what Derek Hook calls a psycho-societal-diagnostic framework in conjunction with Fanon to show how subjectivities are structured in post-apartheid South Africa. We then consider how this time-subjectivity relationship is enacted at a geopolitical level. The paper ends by considering decolonial temporalities as a way to 're-cognize' at a collective level. While the paper engages with a series of concepts and ideas, namely capitalism, politics of justice, gender and race, these are threaded by the concept of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We currently inhabit an era marked by increasing economic inequality. This paper delves into the repercussions of perceived economic inequality on individual‐level pro‐environmental engagement and puts forth an explanatory mechanism. Across three empirical studies encompassing an archival investigation employing a nationally representative data set (Study 1), an online survey (Study 2) and an in‐lab experiment (Study 3), we consistently unearth the inhibiting effect of perceived economic inequality on individuals' pro‐environmental involvement, whether assessed through pro‐environmental intentions or behaviours. Furthermore, our findings reveal that individuals' identification with their country elucidates these results. Specifically, perceived economic inequality diminishes individuals' national identification, encompassing their concern for the country's well‐being and their sense of shared destiny with fellow citizens, thereby curbing their pro‐environmental engagement. Additionally, we conduct a single‐paper meta‐analysis (Study 4), revealing small to moderate effect sizes for our key findings. Theoretical and practical implications stemming from these novel findings are discussed.
{"title":"Perceived economic inequality inhibits pro‐environmental engagement","authors":"Rongmian Huo, Shasha Yang, Cai Dong, Sijing Chen","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12815","url":null,"abstract":"We currently inhabit an era marked by increasing economic inequality. This paper delves into the repercussions of perceived economic inequality on individual‐level pro‐environmental engagement and puts forth an explanatory mechanism. Across three empirical studies encompassing an archival investigation employing a nationally representative data set (Study 1), an online survey (Study 2) and an in‐lab experiment (Study 3), we consistently unearth the inhibiting effect of perceived economic inequality on individuals' pro‐environmental involvement, whether assessed through pro‐environmental intentions or behaviours. Furthermore, our findings reveal that individuals' identification with their country elucidates these results. Specifically, perceived economic inequality diminishes individuals' national identification, encompassing their concern for the country's well‐being and their sense of shared destiny with fellow citizens, thereby curbing their pro‐environmental engagement. Additionally, we conduct a single‐paper meta‐analysis (Study 4), revealing small to moderate effect sizes for our key findings. Theoretical and practical implications stemming from these novel findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wojciech Podsiadłowski,Marta Marchlewska,Marta Rogoza,Zuzanna Molenda,Aleksandra Cichocka
Previous research linked counternormative tendencies (e.g., conspiracy beliefs, cyberbullying, and catfishing) to narcissism-a personality trait characterized by difficulties in experiencing psychological threats. We argue that avoidance coping with stress favours attitudes and behaviours that allow for deflecting from stressful events and releasing one's stress at the expense of others. Thus, we hypothesized that avoidance coping might explain why narcissism favours counternormative tendencies. We conducted four studies (total N = 2643) in the United States and Poland to examine avoidance coping as a mediator of the relationship between narcissism and counternormative tendencies: conspiracy beliefs (Studies 1-4), willingness to conspire (Studies 2-4), cyberbullying (Studies 3-4) and catfishing (Study 4). All studies found a consistent positive indirect relationship between various forms of narcissism and counternormative tendencies via avoidance coping. These findings suggest that counternormative tendencies might reflect using maladaptive coping strategies.
{"title":"Avoidance coping explains the link between narcissism and counternormative tendencies.","authors":"Wojciech Podsiadłowski,Marta Marchlewska,Marta Rogoza,Zuzanna Molenda,Aleksandra Cichocka","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12816","url":null,"abstract":"Previous research linked counternormative tendencies (e.g., conspiracy beliefs, cyberbullying, and catfishing) to narcissism-a personality trait characterized by difficulties in experiencing psychological threats. We argue that avoidance coping with stress favours attitudes and behaviours that allow for deflecting from stressful events and releasing one's stress at the expense of others. Thus, we hypothesized that avoidance coping might explain why narcissism favours counternormative tendencies. We conducted four studies (total N = 2643) in the United States and Poland to examine avoidance coping as a mediator of the relationship between narcissism and counternormative tendencies: conspiracy beliefs (Studies 1-4), willingness to conspire (Studies 2-4), cyberbullying (Studies 3-4) and catfishing (Study 4). All studies found a consistent positive indirect relationship between various forms of narcissism and counternormative tendencies via avoidance coping. These findings suggest that counternormative tendencies might reflect using maladaptive coping strategies.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simon Schindler,Carolin Schuster,Maria I T Olsson,Laura Froehlich,Ann-Kathrin Hübner,Katharina Block,Colette Van Laar,Toni Schmader,Loes Meeussen,Sanne van Grootel,Alyssa Croft,Molly Shuyi Sun,Mare Ainsaar,Lianne Aarntzen,Magdalena Adamus,Joel Anderson,Ciara Atkinson,Mohamad Avicenna,Przemysław Bąbel,Markus Barth,Tessa Benson-Greenwald,Edona Maloku,Jacques Berent,Hilary B Bergsieker,Monica Biernat,Andreea Birneanu,Blerta Bodinaku,Janine Bosak,Jennifer Bosson,Marija Branković,Julius Burkauskas,Vladimíra Čavojová,Sapna Cheryan,Eunsoo Choi,Incheol Choi,Carlos C Contreras-Ibáñez,Andrew Coogan,Ivan Danyliuk,Ilan Dar-Nimrod,Nilanjana Dasgupta,Soledad de Lemus,Thierry Devos,Marwan Diab,Amanda B Diekman,Maria Efremova,Léïla Eisner,Anja Eller,Rasa Erentaite,Denisa Fedáková,Renata Franc,Leire Gartzia,Alin Gavreliuc,Dana Gavreliuc,Julija Gecaite-Stonciene,Adriana L Germano,Ilaria Giovannelli,Renzo Gismondi Diaz,Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva,Abiy Menkir Gizaw,Biljana Gjoneska,Omar Martínez González,Roberto González,Isaac David Grijalva,Derya Güngör,Marie Gustafsson Sendén,William Hall,Charles Harb,Bushra Hassan,Tabea Hässler,Diala R Hawi,Levke Henningsen,Annedore Hoppe,Keiko Ishii,Ivana Jakšić,Alba Jasini,Jurgita Jurkevičienė,Kaltrina Kelmendi,Teri A Kirby,Yoko Kitakaji,Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka,Inna Kozytska,Clara Kulich,Eva Kundtová-Klocová,Filiz Kunuroglu,Christina Lapytskaia Aidy,Albert Lee,Anna Lindqvist,Wilson López-López,Liany Luzvinda,Fridanna Maricchiolo,Delphine Martinot,Rita Anne McNamara,Alyson Meister,Tizita Lemma Melka,Narseta Mickuviene,María Isabel Miranda-Orrego,Thadeus Mkamwa,James Morandini,Thomas Morton,David Mrisho,Jana Nikitin,Sabine Otten,Maria Giuseppina Pacilli,Elizabeth Page-Gould,Ana Perandrés-Gómez,Jon Pizarro,Nada Pop-Jordanova,Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna,Sameir Quta,TamilSelvan Ramis,Nitya Rani,Sandrine Redersdorff,Isabelle Régner,Emma A Renström,Adrian Rivera-Rodriguez,Rocha-Sánchez Tania Esmeralda,Tatiana Ryabichenko,Rim Saab,Kiriko Sakata,Adil Samekin,Tracy Sánchez-Pacheco,Carolin Scheifele,Marion K Schulmeyer,Sabine Sczesny,David Sirlopú,Vanessa Smith-Castro,Kadri Soo,Federica Spaccatini,Jennifer R Steele,Melanie C Steffens,Ines Sucic,Joseph Vandello,Laura Maria Velásquez-Díaz,Melissa Vink,Eva Vives,Turuwark Zalalam Warkineh,Iris Žeželj,Xiaoxiao Zhang,Xian Zhao,Yasin Koc,Ömer Erdem Kocak,Sarah E Martiny
In the present work, we addressed the relationship between parental leave policies and social norms. Using a pre-registered, cross-national approach, we examined the relationship between parental leave policies and the perception of social norms for the gender division of childcare. In this study, 19,259 students (11,924 women) from 48 countries indicated the degree to which they believe childcare is (descriptive norm) and should be (prescriptive norm) equally divided among mothers and fathers. Policies were primarily operationalized as the existence of parental leave options in the respective country. The descriptive and prescriptive norms of equal division of childcare were stronger when parental leave was available in a country - also when controlling for potential confounding variables. Moreover, analyses of time since policy change suggested that policy change may initially affect prescriptive norms and then descriptive norms at a later point. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, drawing causal inferences is difficult.
{"title":"Policy as normative influence? On the relationship between parental leave policy and social norms in gender division of childcare across 48 countries.","authors":"Simon Schindler,Carolin Schuster,Maria I T Olsson,Laura Froehlich,Ann-Kathrin Hübner,Katharina Block,Colette Van Laar,Toni Schmader,Loes Meeussen,Sanne van Grootel,Alyssa Croft,Molly Shuyi Sun,Mare Ainsaar,Lianne Aarntzen,Magdalena Adamus,Joel Anderson,Ciara Atkinson,Mohamad Avicenna,Przemysław Bąbel,Markus Barth,Tessa Benson-Greenwald,Edona Maloku,Jacques Berent,Hilary B Bergsieker,Monica Biernat,Andreea Birneanu,Blerta Bodinaku,Janine Bosak,Jennifer Bosson,Marija Branković,Julius Burkauskas,Vladimíra Čavojová,Sapna Cheryan,Eunsoo Choi,Incheol Choi,Carlos C Contreras-Ibáñez,Andrew Coogan,Ivan Danyliuk,Ilan Dar-Nimrod,Nilanjana Dasgupta,Soledad de Lemus,Thierry Devos,Marwan Diab,Amanda B Diekman,Maria Efremova,Léïla Eisner,Anja Eller,Rasa Erentaite,Denisa Fedáková,Renata Franc,Leire Gartzia,Alin Gavreliuc,Dana Gavreliuc,Julija Gecaite-Stonciene,Adriana L Germano,Ilaria Giovannelli,Renzo Gismondi Diaz,Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva,Abiy Menkir Gizaw,Biljana Gjoneska,Omar Martínez González,Roberto González,Isaac David Grijalva,Derya Güngör,Marie Gustafsson Sendén,William Hall,Charles Harb,Bushra Hassan,Tabea Hässler,Diala R Hawi,Levke Henningsen,Annedore Hoppe,Keiko Ishii,Ivana Jakšić,Alba Jasini,Jurgita Jurkevičienė,Kaltrina Kelmendi,Teri A Kirby,Yoko Kitakaji,Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka,Inna Kozytska,Clara Kulich,Eva Kundtová-Klocová,Filiz Kunuroglu,Christina Lapytskaia Aidy,Albert Lee,Anna Lindqvist,Wilson López-López,Liany Luzvinda,Fridanna Maricchiolo,Delphine Martinot,Rita Anne McNamara,Alyson Meister,Tizita Lemma Melka,Narseta Mickuviene,María Isabel Miranda-Orrego,Thadeus Mkamwa,James Morandini,Thomas Morton,David Mrisho,Jana Nikitin,Sabine Otten,Maria Giuseppina Pacilli,Elizabeth Page-Gould,Ana Perandrés-Gómez,Jon Pizarro,Nada Pop-Jordanova,Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna,Sameir Quta,TamilSelvan Ramis,Nitya Rani,Sandrine Redersdorff,Isabelle Régner,Emma A Renström,Adrian Rivera-Rodriguez,Rocha-Sánchez Tania Esmeralda,Tatiana Ryabichenko,Rim Saab,Kiriko Sakata,Adil Samekin,Tracy Sánchez-Pacheco,Carolin Scheifele,Marion K Schulmeyer,Sabine Sczesny,David Sirlopú,Vanessa Smith-Castro,Kadri Soo,Federica Spaccatini,Jennifer R Steele,Melanie C Steffens,Ines Sucic,Joseph Vandello,Laura Maria Velásquez-Díaz,Melissa Vink,Eva Vives,Turuwark Zalalam Warkineh,Iris Žeželj,Xiaoxiao Zhang,Xian Zhao,Yasin Koc,Ömer Erdem Kocak,Sarah E Martiny","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12806","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12806","url":null,"abstract":"In the present work, we addressed the relationship between parental leave policies and social norms. Using a pre-registered, cross-national approach, we examined the relationship between parental leave policies and the perception of social norms for the gender division of childcare. In this study, 19,259 students (11,924 women) from 48 countries indicated the degree to which they believe childcare is (descriptive norm) and should be (prescriptive norm) equally divided among mothers and fathers. Policies were primarily operationalized as the existence of parental leave options in the respective country. The descriptive and prescriptive norms of equal division of childcare were stronger when parental leave was available in a country - also when controlling for potential confounding variables. Moreover, analyses of time since policy change suggested that policy change may initially affect prescriptive norms and then descriptive norms at a later point. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, drawing causal inferences is difficult.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While social psychology has contributed much to our understanding of collective action, other forms of resistance are understudied. However, in contexts of long-standing oppression-such as ongoing colonialism-and past repression of liberation struggles, other resistance strategies are important considering the constraints on overt, collective action in such contexts. This paper reports findings from an interview study in Puerto Rico (N = 22) exploring anti-colonial resistance. We analysed participants' own resistance, future preferred strategies, and descriptive norms of other ingroup members' resistance. Through thematic analysis, we identified six distinct forms of anti-colonial resistance. Notably, none of the participants reported participating in collective action. Instead, participants engaged in different forms of symbolic everyday resistance to preserve a positive, distinct cultural identity, and raise critical consciousness of the group's oppression. Additionally, more tangible resistance strategies included staying on the land and building independent economies. Overall, this study illustrates the importance of considering a more comprehensive set of resistance strategies in contexts of long-standing colonial oppression to recognize oppressed groups' agency and provide a better understanding of how people undermine destructive power.
{"title":"\"When you live in a colony… every act counts\": Exploring engagement in and perceptions of diverse anti-colonial resistance strategies in Puerto Rico.","authors":"Carmen Marazzi, Johanna Ray Vollhardt","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While social psychology has contributed much to our understanding of collective action, other forms of resistance are understudied. However, in contexts of long-standing oppression-such as ongoing colonialism-and past repression of liberation struggles, other resistance strategies are important considering the constraints on overt, collective action in such contexts. This paper reports findings from an interview study in Puerto Rico (N = 22) exploring anti-colonial resistance. We analysed participants' own resistance, future preferred strategies, and descriptive norms of other ingroup members' resistance. Through thematic analysis, we identified six distinct forms of anti-colonial resistance. Notably, none of the participants reported participating in collective action. Instead, participants engaged in different forms of symbolic everyday resistance to preserve a positive, distinct cultural identity, and raise critical consciousness of the group's oppression. Additionally, more tangible resistance strategies included staying on the land and building independent economies. Overall, this study illustrates the importance of considering a more comprehensive set of resistance strategies in contexts of long-standing colonial oppression to recognize oppressed groups' agency and provide a better understanding of how people undermine destructive power.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}