Ten-year-long implementation of a bundle for the prevention of surgical site infections: a cohort study of the temporal trend and factors influencing compliance.
Federico Cussotto, Costanza Vicentini, Luca Bresciano, Marta Castagnotto, Tommaso Cocchi, Dayana Indira Herr Ferrer, Carla Maria Zotti
{"title":"Ten-year-long implementation of a bundle for the prevention of surgical site infections: a cohort study of the temporal trend and factors influencing compliance.","authors":"Federico Cussotto, Costanza Vicentini, Luca Bresciano, Marta Castagnotto, Tommaso Cocchi, Dayana Indira Herr Ferrer, Carla Maria Zotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many bundles have proven effective at preventing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), but little is known about factors influencing compliance to such bundles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study includes 41400 surgeries performed in 47 hospitals throughout a decade. The outcome of interest was binary compliance with a 4-element bundle for SSI prevention. A multivariable logistic regression model was computed with twelve predictor variables: patient sex, age, ASA score, surgical specialty, length of preoperative stay, procedure year, procedure duration, surgical technique, presence of a prosthetic implant, elective vs emergent procedure, hospital type and hospital size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bundle compliance has increased significantly since its implementation, reaching 67.1% in the latest year. Lower odds of bundle compliance are correlated with emergent procedures (OR 0.3697), procedure duration above the first tertile (0.8597), age above the first quartile (0.7365), absence of a prosthetic implant, open surgical technique, and preoperative stay above 1 day (0.7920).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Older age, longer procedure duration, longer preoperative stay, and an open surgical technique all correlate negatively with bundle compliance and are also known risk factors for SSIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain patient subgroups are at higher risk for bundle non-compliance, and thus show greater margins for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many bundles have proven effective at preventing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), but little is known about factors influencing compliance to such bundles.
Methods: This cohort study includes 41400 surgeries performed in 47 hospitals throughout a decade. The outcome of interest was binary compliance with a 4-element bundle for SSI prevention. A multivariable logistic regression model was computed with twelve predictor variables: patient sex, age, ASA score, surgical specialty, length of preoperative stay, procedure year, procedure duration, surgical technique, presence of a prosthetic implant, elective vs emergent procedure, hospital type and hospital size.
Results: Bundle compliance has increased significantly since its implementation, reaching 67.1% in the latest year. Lower odds of bundle compliance are correlated with emergent procedures (OR 0.3697), procedure duration above the first tertile (0.8597), age above the first quartile (0.7365), absence of a prosthetic implant, open surgical technique, and preoperative stay above 1 day (0.7920).
Discussion: Older age, longer procedure duration, longer preoperative stay, and an open surgical technique all correlate negatively with bundle compliance and are also known risk factors for SSIs.
Conclusion: Certain patient subgroups are at higher risk for bundle non-compliance, and thus show greater margins for improvement.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)