Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Robot for Non-Face-to-Face Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen Collection: Nonclinical and Clinical Trial Findings for COVID-19 Testing.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1177/19458924251323363
Jae-Min Shin, Munsoo Han, Dabin Lee, Joonho Seo, Jeoung-Min Lee, Yeongjun Chang, Tae Hoon Kim
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Robot for Non-Face-to-Face Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen Collection: Nonclinical and Clinical Trial Findings for COVID-19 Testing.","authors":"Jae-Min Shin, Munsoo Han, Dabin Lee, Joonho Seo, Jeoung-Min Lee, Yeongjun Chang, Tae Hoon Kim","doi":"10.1177/19458924251323363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To meet the high demand for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to diagnose COVID-19 and rapidly control the outbreak, an efficient and safe molecular diagnostic protocol is necessary. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the medical robot developed for non-face-to-face nasopharyngeal swab specimen collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a nonclinical study, an otorhinolaryngologist collected swab specimens manually and using a medical robot. In a single-institution, randomized, open-label, prospective, exploratory clinical trial, nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected from the enrolled participants both manually and by using the medical robot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of nasopharyngeal swab collection using a medical robot was assessed. After the operation of the robot, subjective discomfort experienced by the participants and any side effects or abnormalities in the nose were also monitored. Preliminary nonclinical data revealed comparable results between robotic and manual methods in terms of RNA metrics and cytokeratin-8 expression. Minor initial damage to A549 cells by the robot improved with subsequent use. In the clinical setting, the robot-assisted technique yielded a 92.31% detection rate for human RNase P, while the manual method achieved 100%. Post-swabbing discomfort reported by participants was similar for both methods and resolved within 48 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The medical robot system could efficiently, safely, and accurately collect nasopharyngeal swab samples in a non-face-to-face manner. Its installation in respiratory clinics, airports, or ports could minimize the infection risk between individuals and healthcare workers, thereby contributing to an efficient distribution of medical resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"19458924251323363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251323363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To meet the high demand for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to diagnose COVID-19 and rapidly control the outbreak, an efficient and safe molecular diagnostic protocol is necessary. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the medical robot developed for non-face-to-face nasopharyngeal swab specimen collection.

Methods: In a nonclinical study, an otorhinolaryngologist collected swab specimens manually and using a medical robot. In a single-institution, randomized, open-label, prospective, exploratory clinical trial, nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected from the enrolled participants both manually and by using the medical robot.

Results: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of nasopharyngeal swab collection using a medical robot was assessed. After the operation of the robot, subjective discomfort experienced by the participants and any side effects or abnormalities in the nose were also monitored. Preliminary nonclinical data revealed comparable results between robotic and manual methods in terms of RNA metrics and cytokeratin-8 expression. Minor initial damage to A549 cells by the robot improved with subsequent use. In the clinical setting, the robot-assisted technique yielded a 92.31% detection rate for human RNase P, while the manual method achieved 100%. Post-swabbing discomfort reported by participants was similar for both methods and resolved within 48 h.

Conclusions: The medical robot system could efficiently, safely, and accurately collect nasopharyngeal swab samples in a non-face-to-face manner. Its installation in respiratory clinics, airports, or ports could minimize the infection risk between individuals and healthcare workers, thereby contributing to an efficient distribution of medical resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Robot for Non-Face-to-Face Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen Collection: Nonclinical and Clinical Trial Findings for COVID-19 Testing. A Global Perspective on Sinonasal Research. The Effect of the Nasal Structure on the Olfactory Cleft Airflow: A Systematic Review. Dupilumab Treatment for Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease in a Real-World Setting: Impact on Quality of Life and Healthcare Utilization. Radiomics of the Paranasal Sinuses: A Systematic Review of Computer-Assisted Techniques to Assess Computed Tomography Radiological Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1