Continuous glucose monitoring with low-glucose alerts in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes: A randomized crossover study.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112074
Ryutaro Maeda, Takeshi Onoue, Keigo Mizutani, Koji Suzuki, Tomoko Handa, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shintaro Iwama, Takashi Miyata, Mariko Sugiyama, Daisuke Hagiwara, Hidetaka Suga, Fumie Kinoshita, Hiroshi Arima
{"title":"Continuous glucose monitoring with low-glucose alerts in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes: A randomized crossover study.","authors":"Ryutaro Maeda, Takeshi Onoue, Keigo Mizutani, Koji Suzuki, Tomoko Handa, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shintaro Iwama, Takashi Miyata, Mariko Sugiyama, Daisuke Hagiwara, Hidetaka Suga, Fumie Kinoshita, Hiroshi Arima","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with low-glucose alerts for preventing hypoglycemia in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study involved 30 insulin-treated participants with diabetes who drove cars at least thrice weekly in Japan. Participants underwent two 4-week periods: an alert period using CGM with active low-glucose alerts and a no-alert period using blinded CGM without low-glucose alerts, separated by an eight-week washout period. The primary outcome was the percentage of time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven of the 30 participants completed the CGM analysis. Although the TBR did not differ between the alert and no-alert periods among all participants, it significantly decreased during the alert period compared with the no-alert period among the participants with type 1 diabetes (-4.4 [95 % confidence interval - 8.7, -0.08]%, p = 0.047). The incidence of low-glucose when driving was significantly lower during the alert period than during the no-alert period (19 % vs. 33 %, p = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-glucose alerts improved the TBR in drivers with type 1 diabetes and reduced the incidence of low-glucose while driving among all insulin-treated drivers, suggesting that these alerts may ensure the safety of insulin-treated drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112074"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with low-glucose alerts for preventing hypoglycemia in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes.

Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study involved 30 insulin-treated participants with diabetes who drove cars at least thrice weekly in Japan. Participants underwent two 4-week periods: an alert period using CGM with active low-glucose alerts and a no-alert period using blinded CGM without low-glucose alerts, separated by an eight-week washout period. The primary outcome was the percentage of time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L).

Results: Twenty-seven of the 30 participants completed the CGM analysis. Although the TBR did not differ between the alert and no-alert periods among all participants, it significantly decreased during the alert period compared with the no-alert period among the participants with type 1 diabetes (-4.4 [95 % confidence interval - 8.7, -0.08]%, p = 0.047). The incidence of low-glucose when driving was significantly lower during the alert period than during the no-alert period (19 % vs. 33 %, p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Low-glucose alerts improved the TBR in drivers with type 1 diabetes and reduced the incidence of low-glucose while driving among all insulin-treated drivers, suggesting that these alerts may ensure the safety of insulin-treated drivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Tirzepatide and major adverse limb events: Insights from a multicenter real-world analysis in PAD and diabetes patients Letter to "Daytime napping and risk of incident main adverse cardiovascular events and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes". Association between interleukin-6, suPAR, and hsCRP with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in type 1 diabetes: The Thousand & 1 study. Characterisation of transfusion-dependent prediabetes using continuous glucose monitoring: The Haemoglycare study Continuous glucose monitoring with low-glucose alerts in insulin-treated drivers with diabetes: A randomized crossover study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1