Equity-Driven Diagnostic Excellence framework: An upstream approach to minimize risk of diagnostic inequity.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0160
Noor H Simsam, Rawan Abuhamad, Khalid Azzam
{"title":"Equity-Driven Diagnostic Excellence framework: An upstream approach to minimize risk of diagnostic inequity.","authors":"Noor H Simsam, Rawan Abuhamad, Khalid Azzam","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnostic errors represent the most common and costly preventable patient safety events, with historically marginalized populations disproportionately impacted due to systemic inequities in healthcare. Addressing these disparities requires embedding equity into every facet of the diagnostic process. The aim was to develop, refine, and validate a competency framework for Equity-Driven Diagnostic Excellence (DxEqEx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was used, involving transdisciplinary diverse healthcare system participants, including patient advocates, physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. Participants were guided through multiple rounds of feedback and ratings, assessing the importance, disciplinary relevance, feasibility, skill acquisition level required, granularity, and representativeness of the DxEqEx framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen essential competencies have been identified, categorized into three domains: Intrapersonal, Team-based, and Structural. Participants rated the framework with high importance and strong relevance to their respective disciplines. However, the feasibility of implementing the framework varied, largely due to broader challenges within the healthcare system. The competencies were assessed as requiring a proficient skill level according to Dreyfus' model. The final round maintained strong ratings for granularity and representativeness, which supported the final version of the framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DxEqEx framework holds significant potential to proactively address the needs of historically marginalized patients throughout the diagnostic process. Future research should focus on participatory, resource-efficient implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic errors represent the most common and costly preventable patient safety events, with historically marginalized populations disproportionately impacted due to systemic inequities in healthcare. Addressing these disparities requires embedding equity into every facet of the diagnostic process. The aim was to develop, refine, and validate a competency framework for Equity-Driven Diagnostic Excellence (DxEqEx).

Methods: A modified Delphi method was used, involving transdisciplinary diverse healthcare system participants, including patient advocates, physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. Participants were guided through multiple rounds of feedback and ratings, assessing the importance, disciplinary relevance, feasibility, skill acquisition level required, granularity, and representativeness of the DxEqEx framework.

Results: Sixteen essential competencies have been identified, categorized into three domains: Intrapersonal, Team-based, and Structural. Participants rated the framework with high importance and strong relevance to their respective disciplines. However, the feasibility of implementing the framework varied, largely due to broader challenges within the healthcare system. The competencies were assessed as requiring a proficient skill level according to Dreyfus' model. The final round maintained strong ratings for granularity and representativeness, which supported the final version of the framework.

Conclusions: The DxEqEx framework holds significant potential to proactively address the needs of historically marginalized patients throughout the diagnostic process. Future research should focus on participatory, resource-efficient implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平驱动的卓越诊断框架:将诊断不公平风险降至最低的上游方法。
诊断错误是最常见和最昂贵的可预防的患者安全事件,由于医疗保健系统的不公平,历史上边缘化的人群受到不成比例的影响。解决这些差异需要将公平纳入诊断过程的各个方面。其目的是开发、完善和验证股权驱动卓越诊断(DxEqEx)的能力框架。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法,涉及跨学科的不同医疗保健系统参与者,包括患者倡导者、医生、护士和其他医疗保健专业人员。参与者被引导通过多轮反馈和评级,评估DxEqEx框架的重要性、学科相关性、可行性、所需技能获取水平、粒度和代表性。结果:已经确定了16种基本能力,并将其分为三个领域:内部人能力、团队能力和结构能力。与会者认为该框架非常重要,与他们各自的学科密切相关。然而,实施该框架的可行性各不相同,主要是由于医疗保健系统内更广泛的挑战。根据Dreyfus的模型,这些能力被评估为需要熟练的技能水平。最后一轮对粒度和代表性保持了很高的评级,这支持了框架的最终版本。结论:DxEqEx框架具有巨大的潜力,可以在整个诊断过程中主动解决历史上边缘化患者的需求。未来的研究应侧重于参与性、资源效率的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
期刊最新文献
Potential missed diagnostic opportunities after low dose CT screening for lung cancer: results from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial. Cognitive biases and collapse of prioritization accuracy under incongruent clinical data: a mixed-methods study of nursing diagnostic reasoning. Diagnostic errors in abdominal pain: a secondary analysis of case reports. Associative thinking as a lever for diagnostic creativity. Tuberculosis-induced arthritis (Poncet's disease): diagnostic challenges and a workflow for clinical decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1