Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Audiometric Parameters for Assistive Hearing Technology for Adults and Children With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.
Thomas Hampton, Alan Sanderson, Kevin Mortimer, Mahmood Bhutta
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Audiometric Parameters for Assistive Hearing Technology for Adults and Children With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.","authors":"Thomas Hampton, Alan Sanderson, Kevin Mortimer, Mahmood Bhutta","doi":"10.1111/coa.14295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tympanic membrane perforation can cause hearing impairment with detrimental effects on communication and quality of life, and is a problem affecting an estimated 250 million people. To date, there is little analysis to inform public policy on options for assistive hearing technology rehabilitation in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of six electronic databases registered with PROSPERO and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. The primary outcome was the mean air and bone conduction hearing threshold associated with tympanic perforation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 720 studies identified, 16 contained data for meta-analysis. Mean air conduction threshold was 48.3 dB HL in adults and 31.9 dB HL in children. Mean bone conduction was 26.6 dB HL in adults and 9.5 dB HL in children. The prediction interval was -1.7 to 46.7 dB HL for bone conduction and 15.0-70.5 dB HL for air conduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of adults and children with tympanic perforation have air conduction thresholds within the range of rehabilitation with air conduction hearing aids. The majority also have good sensorineural hearing reserve, meaning bone conduction devices are also suitable. Our analysis can guide the development of affordable technology for the rehabilitation of those with tympanic perforation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Tympanic membrane perforation can cause hearing impairment with detrimental effects on communication and quality of life, and is a problem affecting an estimated 250 million people. To date, there is little analysis to inform public policy on options for assistive hearing technology rehabilitation in this group.
Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of six electronic databases registered with PROSPERO and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. The primary outcome was the mean air and bone conduction hearing threshold associated with tympanic perforation.
Results: Of 720 studies identified, 16 contained data for meta-analysis. Mean air conduction threshold was 48.3 dB HL in adults and 31.9 dB HL in children. Mean bone conduction was 26.6 dB HL in adults and 9.5 dB HL in children. The prediction interval was -1.7 to 46.7 dB HL for bone conduction and 15.0-70.5 dB HL for air conduction.
Conclusions: The majority of adults and children with tympanic perforation have air conduction thresholds within the range of rehabilitation with air conduction hearing aids. The majority also have good sensorineural hearing reserve, meaning bone conduction devices are also suitable. Our analysis can guide the development of affordable technology for the rehabilitation of those with tympanic perforation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.