Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Audiometric Parameters for Assistive Hearing Technology for Adults and Children With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Clinical Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1111/coa.14295
Thomas Hampton, Alan Sanderson, Kevin Mortimer, Mahmood Bhutta
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Audiometric Parameters for Assistive Hearing Technology for Adults and Children With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.","authors":"Thomas Hampton, Alan Sanderson, Kevin Mortimer, Mahmood Bhutta","doi":"10.1111/coa.14295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tympanic membrane perforation can cause hearing impairment with detrimental effects on communication and quality of life, and is a problem affecting an estimated 250 million people. To date, there is little analysis to inform public policy on options for assistive hearing technology rehabilitation in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of six electronic databases registered with PROSPERO and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. The primary outcome was the mean air and bone conduction hearing threshold associated with tympanic perforation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 720 studies identified, 16 contained data for meta-analysis. Mean air conduction threshold was 48.3 dB HL in adults and 31.9 dB HL in children. Mean bone conduction was 26.6 dB HL in adults and 9.5 dB HL in children. The prediction interval was -1.7 to 46.7 dB HL for bone conduction and 15.0-70.5 dB HL for air conduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of adults and children with tympanic perforation have air conduction thresholds within the range of rehabilitation with air conduction hearing aids. The majority also have good sensorineural hearing reserve, meaning bone conduction devices are also suitable. Our analysis can guide the development of affordable technology for the rehabilitation of those with tympanic perforation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tympanic membrane perforation can cause hearing impairment with detrimental effects on communication and quality of life, and is a problem affecting an estimated 250 million people. To date, there is little analysis to inform public policy on options for assistive hearing technology rehabilitation in this group.

Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of six electronic databases registered with PROSPERO and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. The primary outcome was the mean air and bone conduction hearing threshold associated with tympanic perforation.

Results: Of 720 studies identified, 16 contained data for meta-analysis. Mean air conduction threshold was 48.3 dB HL in adults and 31.9 dB HL in children. Mean bone conduction was 26.6 dB HL in adults and 9.5 dB HL in children. The prediction interval was -1.7 to 46.7 dB HL for bone conduction and 15.0-70.5 dB HL for air conduction.

Conclusions: The majority of adults and children with tympanic perforation have air conduction thresholds within the range of rehabilitation with air conduction hearing aids. The majority also have good sensorineural hearing reserve, meaning bone conduction devices are also suitable. Our analysis can guide the development of affordable technology for the rehabilitation of those with tympanic perforation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Hearing Loss Induced by Cisplatin Versus Carboplatin in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Early to Mid-Term Findings. Clinical Findings in Symptomatic Patients With Radiologically Isolated Sphenoid Sinus Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bespoke Septal Prosthesis for Nasal Septal Perforation: A Retrospective Review of Patient Outcome. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Audiometric Parameters for Assistive Hearing Technology for Adults and Children With Tympanic Membrane Perforation. No Difference in Pain or Febrile Episodes With the Use of Post-Operative Antibiotics in Paediatric Coblation Intracapsular Tonsillectomy for Sleep-Disordered Breathing or Recurrent Tonsillitis: A Prospective Randomised Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1