Psychometric Properties of Dysphagia Handicap Index Scale for Older Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in China.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Dysphagia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s00455-025-10808-4
Laiyou Li, Ning Sun, Qianru Li, Chaoyan Fan, Hongyu Li, Shuang Yang, Yun Li, Kaiying Zhong, Junxin Yan
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of Dysphagia Handicap Index Scale for Older Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in China.","authors":"Laiyou Li, Ning Sun, Qianru Li, Chaoyan Fan, Hongyu Li, Shuang Yang, Yun Li, Kaiying Zhong, Junxin Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) on older adults is recognized in Western countries but has not received sufficient attention in China. The dysphagia handicap index (DHI) scale is an OD quality-of-life evaluation instrument. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of DHI scale in older Chinese adults. A total of 600 older adults were recruited from five nursing homes in one city to complete the 25-item scale. The reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated: internal consistency was investigated using Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient; the content validity of the scale was evaluated using content validity ratio; and the factor structure was examined using an exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale was divided into three subscales: physical, functional, and emotional. Cronbach's alpha was 0.97 for the entire scale and between 0.89 and 0.94 for the three subscales. The item-to-total correlation coefficients for the three subscales were between 0.63 and 0.92, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.87. The content validity was 0.93. In the factor analysis, these three factors accounted for 75.3% variance of 25 items. The confirmatory factor analysis was significant (p < 0.0001). The Chinese version of dysphagia index scale had good reliability and validity. Thus, it can provide a subjective evaluation of older adults with OD and can be used by clinicians to improve the outcomes of older adults with OD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10808-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) on older adults is recognized in Western countries but has not received sufficient attention in China. The dysphagia handicap index (DHI) scale is an OD quality-of-life evaluation instrument. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of DHI scale in older Chinese adults. A total of 600 older adults were recruited from five nursing homes in one city to complete the 25-item scale. The reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated: internal consistency was investigated using Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient; the content validity of the scale was evaluated using content validity ratio; and the factor structure was examined using an exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale was divided into three subscales: physical, functional, and emotional. Cronbach's alpha was 0.97 for the entire scale and between 0.89 and 0.94 for the three subscales. The item-to-total correlation coefficients for the three subscales were between 0.63 and 0.92, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.87. The content validity was 0.93. In the factor analysis, these three factors accounted for 75.3% variance of 25 items. The confirmatory factor analysis was significant (p < 0.0001). The Chinese version of dysphagia index scale had good reliability and validity. Thus, it can provide a subjective evaluation of older adults with OD and can be used by clinicians to improve the outcomes of older adults with OD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Italian Version of the Feeding-Swallowing Impact Survey for both Members of Parental Dyads. Poor Oral Health in Adults and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies. Efficacy of Game-Based EMG-Biofeedback Therapy in Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Swallowing Evaluation in Post-COVID-19 Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. The Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Mild-Moderate Severity of Multiple Sclerosis with and without Dysphagia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1