Effective disc age: a statistical model for age-dependent and level-specific lumbar disc degeneration using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08729-9
Harrah R Newman, John M Peloquin, Kyle D Meadows, Barry A Bodt, Edward J Vresilovic, Dawn M Elliott
{"title":"Effective disc age: a statistical model for age-dependent and level-specific lumbar disc degeneration using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).","authors":"Harrah R Newman, John M Peloquin, Kyle D Meadows, Barry A Bodt, Edward J Vresilovic, Dawn M Elliott","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08729-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intervertebral disc degeneration progresses with normal aging; yet common disc grading schemes do not account for age. Degeneration progression also varies between spine levels and is similarly not accounted for by current grading schemes. These limitations inhibit differentiation between discs with normal and expected aging (non-pathological) and discs with accelerated degeneration (which may be pathological). We sought to develop a statistical model to quantify normal age and spine level dependent disc degeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four asymptomatic adult subjects ranging evenly from 18 to 83 years old underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine. Subject traits, MRI-derived disc geometry, and MRI biomarkers of T2 relaxation time were evaluated and used to develop a statistical model to predict effective disc age, the age at which normal aging would produce a disc's observed phenotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After evaluating several models, a 4-predictor model utilizing 1) subject height, 2) nucleus pulposus T2 relaxation time, 3) disc mid-sagittal area and 4) disc 3D volume, optimally estimated effective disc age. The effective age closely tracked true age for spine levels L1-L5 (R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.7, RMSE ≈ 10 years) and moderately tracked true age for L5-S1 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.4, RMSE = 14 years). The uncertainty in the effective disc age prediction was ± 3 years as assessed by fivefold cross validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We offer a data-driven, quantitative tool to quantify normal, expected intervertebral disc aging. This effective age model allows future research to target discs with accelerated degeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1697-1708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08729-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intervertebral disc degeneration progresses with normal aging; yet common disc grading schemes do not account for age. Degeneration progression also varies between spine levels and is similarly not accounted for by current grading schemes. These limitations inhibit differentiation between discs with normal and expected aging (non-pathological) and discs with accelerated degeneration (which may be pathological). We sought to develop a statistical model to quantify normal age and spine level dependent disc degeneration.

Methods: Eighty-four asymptomatic adult subjects ranging evenly from 18 to 83 years old underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine. Subject traits, MRI-derived disc geometry, and MRI biomarkers of T2 relaxation time were evaluated and used to develop a statistical model to predict effective disc age, the age at which normal aging would produce a disc's observed phenotype.

Results: After evaluating several models, a 4-predictor model utilizing 1) subject height, 2) nucleus pulposus T2 relaxation time, 3) disc mid-sagittal area and 4) disc 3D volume, optimally estimated effective disc age. The effective age closely tracked true age for spine levels L1-L5 (R2 ≈ 0.7, RMSE ≈ 10 years) and moderately tracked true age for L5-S1 (R2 = 0.4, RMSE = 14 years). The uncertainty in the effective disc age prediction was ± 3 years as assessed by fivefold cross validation.

Conclusion: We offer a data-driven, quantitative tool to quantify normal, expected intervertebral disc aging. This effective age model allows future research to target discs with accelerated degeneration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效椎间盘年龄:利用磁共振成像(MRI)对与年龄有关的腰椎间盘退变和特定水平的腰椎间盘退变建立统计模型。
目的:椎间盘退变是随着正常年龄的增长而发展的;然而,常见的光盘分级方案并没有考虑到年龄。退变的进展在不同的脊柱水平之间也有所不同,目前的分级方案同样没有考虑到这一点。这些限制抑制了椎间盘正常和预期老化(非病理性)和加速退变(可能是病理性)椎间盘之间的区分。我们试图建立一个统计模型来量化正常年龄和脊柱水平相关的椎间盘退变。方法:84例18 ~ 83岁无症状成人患者行腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)检查。研究人员评估了受试者的特征、MRI衍生的椎间盘几何形状和T2松弛时间的MRI生物标志物,并利用这些生物标志物建立了一个统计模型来预测有效椎间盘年龄,即正常衰老会产生椎间盘观察到的表型的年龄。结果:在对多个模型进行评估后,利用1)受试者身高、2)髓核T2松弛时间、3)椎间盘正中矢状面面积和4)椎间盘三维体积建立了一个4-预测模型,最优地预测了椎间盘的有效年龄。有效年龄与L1-L5级的真实年龄密切相关(R2≈0.7,RMSE≈10岁),与L5-S1级的真实年龄中度相关(R2 = 0.4, RMSE = 14岁)。经五重交叉验证,有效椎间盘年龄预测的不确定性为±3年。结论:我们提供了一种数据驱动的定量工具来量化正常的、预期的椎间盘老化。这种有效的年龄模型使未来的研究能够针对加速退变的椎间盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Climatic and clinical risk factors for surgical site infection following spine fusion surgery: a large-scale big data analysis. A modified bone cement pusher for percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with multi-target negative pressure rotary-cutting technique in puncture biopsy for bone tumors. Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and prognostic factors between primary and recurrent sacral chordomas. The ELEVATE-LBP consortium: exercise & evidence to lead effective vital action in translating excellence for low back pain prevention. Intervertebral disc distraction stiffness predicts endplate subsidence following transforaminal interbody cage expansion: an ex vivo study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1