Development and Validation of a Heat Risk Mitigation Tool for Burn Survivors.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003694
Zachary J McKenna, Josh Foster, Whitley C Atkins, Elizabeth A Gideon, Ollie Jay, Federico Tartarini, Craig G Crandall
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Heat Risk Mitigation Tool for Burn Survivors.","authors":"Zachary J McKenna, Josh Foster, Whitley C Atkins, Elizabeth A Gideon, Ollie Jay, Federico Tartarini, Craig G Crandall","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Burn survivors have an increased risk for heat related illnesses, and a heightened perceptual strain during exercise (thereby impeding physical activity), both due to impaired body temperature regulation. We developed and validated a freely deployed online model that burn survivors can use to estimate their heat risk during physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Model inputs included environmental conditions, physical activity intensity and duration, body size, clothing, and burn injury size. The developed model predicts heat risk categorized as either low to moderate (change in core temperature < 1.7 °C) or high to extreme (change in core temperature ≥ 1.7 °C). We compared the core temperature responses and predicted heat risk from laboratory trials conducted in adults aged 19 to 61 years with well healed burn injuries (n = 134) or simulated burn injuries (n = 157). Burn injury sizes ranged from 20 to 80% of body surface area. Trials were conducted in our laboratory across a variety of environmental conditions (25 to 39 °C and 20 to 40 % relative humidity) and exercise intensities (46 to 357 W/m2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With heat risk as a binary outcome, the predictive accuracy of the model was 85%. The specificity of the model was 85% and the sensitivity of the model was 79%. The positive predictive value was 27% and the negative predictive value was 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed model (www.bsrcalculator.org) predicts heat-risk across a variety of environmental conditions and exercise intensities. We anticipate that this tool will inform individuals of their potential risk (or lack thereof) associated with performing physical activity in the heat while also promoting a physically active lifestyle in burn survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003694","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Burn survivors have an increased risk for heat related illnesses, and a heightened perceptual strain during exercise (thereby impeding physical activity), both due to impaired body temperature regulation. We developed and validated a freely deployed online model that burn survivors can use to estimate their heat risk during physical activity.

Methods: Model inputs included environmental conditions, physical activity intensity and duration, body size, clothing, and burn injury size. The developed model predicts heat risk categorized as either low to moderate (change in core temperature < 1.7 °C) or high to extreme (change in core temperature ≥ 1.7 °C). We compared the core temperature responses and predicted heat risk from laboratory trials conducted in adults aged 19 to 61 years with well healed burn injuries (n = 134) or simulated burn injuries (n = 157). Burn injury sizes ranged from 20 to 80% of body surface area. Trials were conducted in our laboratory across a variety of environmental conditions (25 to 39 °C and 20 to 40 % relative humidity) and exercise intensities (46 to 357 W/m2).

Results: With heat risk as a binary outcome, the predictive accuracy of the model was 85%. The specificity of the model was 85% and the sensitivity of the model was 79%. The positive predictive value was 27% and the negative predictive value was 98%.

Conclusions: The developed model (www.bsrcalculator.org) predicts heat-risk across a variety of environmental conditions and exercise intensities. We anticipate that this tool will inform individuals of their potential risk (or lack thereof) associated with performing physical activity in the heat while also promoting a physically active lifestyle in burn survivors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Tai Chi on Multiple Brain Networks Structure-Function Couplings in Individuals with Subthreshold Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Exercise Rescues Blood-Brain Barrier Structural Impairment and Enhances Mitochondrial Biogenesis in a Hypertensive Mouse Model. Development and Validation of a Heat Risk Mitigation Tool for Burn Survivors. Effect of a Pragmatic Exercise Intervention Pilot Study on Preventing Functional and Physical Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults. Training Parameters and Adaptations that Mediate Walking Capacity Gains from High-Intensity Gait Training Post-Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1