Ronnie E Baticulon, Jonis Michael L Esguerra, Muhammad Azhary Lazuardy, Giat Seng Kho, Sharon Y Y Low, Le Quang My, Vincent Diong Weng Nga, Mirna Sobana, Nunthasiri Wittayanakorn, Frederick Boop, Wan Tew Seow
{"title":"Case discussions in pediatric neurosurgery: a model for improving service delivery and neurosurgery education in Southeast Asia.","authors":"Ronnie E Baticulon, Jonis Michael L Esguerra, Muhammad Azhary Lazuardy, Giat Seng Kho, Sharon Y Y Low, Le Quang My, Vincent Diong Weng Nga, Mirna Sobana, Nunthasiri Wittayanakorn, Frederick Boop, Wan Tew Seow","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The number of pediatric neurosurgeons worldwide remains inadequate. Opportunities for fellowship training and continuing medical education in pediatric neurosurgery are limited, particularly for neurosurgeons in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to describe the setup and conduct of a recurring online meeting to discuss diagnostic and treatment dilemmas in pediatric neurosurgery, organized by a group of pediatric neurosurgeons in Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Available meeting reports since inception in 2022 and registration data for the year 2024 were analyzed. Meeting recordings were reviewed to describe the cases presented for opinion. A focus group discussion was conducted among core team members to evaluate the virtual meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2022 to August 2024, the Southeast Asian pediatric neurosurgery group organized 16 online meetings to discuss 50 patients. Based on the report for 12 meetings (75%), the mean number of participants for each session was 45 ± 11, with 91% ± 5% of the attendees being present for at least 15 minutes. Review of 2024 registration data showed that 142 unique participants from 15 countries attended the 5 meetings for this year. Most were neurosurgery residents (65%) and neurosurgery consultants (23%). Of 50 cases presented, the majority were tumors (52%) and craniofacial disorders (16%). Discussions centered on most probable diagnosis (34%), best treatment option (90%), and recommended surgical approach (82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>International case discussions in pediatric neurosurgery are feasible and sustainable online, with the potential to improve service delivery, strengthen the workforce, and grow professional networks. Leadership and time commitment from a core group are essential to ensure the success of these global neurosurgery collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 3","pages":"E13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The number of pediatric neurosurgeons worldwide remains inadequate. Opportunities for fellowship training and continuing medical education in pediatric neurosurgery are limited, particularly for neurosurgeons in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to describe the setup and conduct of a recurring online meeting to discuss diagnostic and treatment dilemmas in pediatric neurosurgery, organized by a group of pediatric neurosurgeons in Southeast Asia.
Methods: Available meeting reports since inception in 2022 and registration data for the year 2024 were analyzed. Meeting recordings were reviewed to describe the cases presented for opinion. A focus group discussion was conducted among core team members to evaluate the virtual meetings.
Results: From January 2022 to August 2024, the Southeast Asian pediatric neurosurgery group organized 16 online meetings to discuss 50 patients. Based on the report for 12 meetings (75%), the mean number of participants for each session was 45 ± 11, with 91% ± 5% of the attendees being present for at least 15 minutes. Review of 2024 registration data showed that 142 unique participants from 15 countries attended the 5 meetings for this year. Most were neurosurgery residents (65%) and neurosurgery consultants (23%). Of 50 cases presented, the majority were tumors (52%) and craniofacial disorders (16%). Discussions centered on most probable diagnosis (34%), best treatment option (90%), and recommended surgical approach (82%).
Conclusions: International case discussions in pediatric neurosurgery are feasible and sustainable online, with the potential to improve service delivery, strengthen the workforce, and grow professional networks. Leadership and time commitment from a core group are essential to ensure the success of these global neurosurgery collaborations.