Epidemiology and delays in neurosurgical care among patients with traumatic brain injury in a regional referral hospital in Sri Lanka: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical focus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24785
Shereen X Y Soon, Paul M Pronyk, Seyed E Saffari, Vithyasahar Sunthareswaran, Rajendra Surenthirakumaran, Ponnampalam Athiththan, Jai P Rao
{"title":"Epidemiology and delays in neurosurgical care among patients with traumatic brain injury in a regional referral hospital in Sri Lanka: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shereen X Y Soon, Paul M Pronyk, Seyed E Saffari, Vithyasahar Sunthareswaran, Rajendra Surenthirakumaran, Ponnampalam Athiththan, Jai P Rao","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop a pilot traumatic brain injury (TBI) registry through a retrospective review of medical records. This was done to investigate the epidemiology and the prevalence of delays to care, both before and after hospital admission, among patients with TBI in the Teaching Hospital Jaffna, a regional referral hospital in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, in which purposive sampling was used to select TBI cases treated between January and December 2021. Patients with TBI were initially identified via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and then stratified via mechanism of injury and length of stay; data collection was done through a review of physical medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 99 patients with TBI who were identified, the majority (72%) were referred from peripheral facilities without neurosurgical support. Road traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury (68.7%) and death (75.9%). TBIs were classified as mild (50.5%), moderate (21.2%), and severe (28.3%). Eighty percent of patients with TBIs who were referred to neurosurgery received opinions within 2 hours, with no significant association with mortality rate. Compared to patients with mild/moderate TBI, those with severe TBI had shorter median times before receiving neurosurgical opinions and CT scan reports. Delays in CT scan reports resulted in prolonged times to receive neurosurgical management. Most patients were managed without neurosurgical operative intervention, with subsequent neurosurgical interventions linked to a higher mortality rate (HR 6.08, p < 0.001). The inpatient mortality rate was 29.3%, mainly from severe TBIs (69%). Patients needing intracranial pressure monitoring had higher inpatient mortality (p < 0.001). Deteriorating Glasgow Coma Scale scores prior to intervention, typically due to inadequate vital sign stabilization, predicted significantly lower survival rates (52% vs 82%, p = 0.0019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with TBI in our cohort faced delays in three main areas: lengthy referral pathways, late stabilization of vital signs and intracranial pressure, and initial neurosurgical management. Developing strategies to mitigate these delays in care will be a crucial factor in reducing neurological morbidity and mortality for patients with TBI seeking treatment in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 3","pages":"E3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a pilot traumatic brain injury (TBI) registry through a retrospective review of medical records. This was done to investigate the epidemiology and the prevalence of delays to care, both before and after hospital admission, among patients with TBI in the Teaching Hospital Jaffna, a regional referral hospital in Sri Lanka.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, in which purposive sampling was used to select TBI cases treated between January and December 2021. Patients with TBI were initially identified via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and then stratified via mechanism of injury and length of stay; data collection was done through a review of physical medical records.

Results: Among the 99 patients with TBI who were identified, the majority (72%) were referred from peripheral facilities without neurosurgical support. Road traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury (68.7%) and death (75.9%). TBIs were classified as mild (50.5%), moderate (21.2%), and severe (28.3%). Eighty percent of patients with TBIs who were referred to neurosurgery received opinions within 2 hours, with no significant association with mortality rate. Compared to patients with mild/moderate TBI, those with severe TBI had shorter median times before receiving neurosurgical opinions and CT scan reports. Delays in CT scan reports resulted in prolonged times to receive neurosurgical management. Most patients were managed without neurosurgical operative intervention, with subsequent neurosurgical interventions linked to a higher mortality rate (HR 6.08, p < 0.001). The inpatient mortality rate was 29.3%, mainly from severe TBIs (69%). Patients needing intracranial pressure monitoring had higher inpatient mortality (p < 0.001). Deteriorating Glasgow Coma Scale scores prior to intervention, typically due to inadequate vital sign stabilization, predicted significantly lower survival rates (52% vs 82%, p = 0.0019).

Conclusions: Patients with TBI in our cohort faced delays in three main areas: lengthy referral pathways, late stabilization of vital signs and intracranial pressure, and initial neurosurgical management. Developing strategies to mitigate these delays in care will be a crucial factor in reducing neurological morbidity and mortality for patients with TBI seeking treatment in resource-limited settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的本研究旨在通过对医疗记录进行回顾性审查,建立创伤性脑损伤(TBI)登记试点。其目的是调查斯里兰卡地区转诊医院贾夫纳教学医院(Teaching Hospital Jaffna)的创伤性脑损伤患者在入院前和入院后的流行病学和护理延误的发生率:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,通过有目的的抽样,选择 2021 年 1 月至 12 月间接受治疗的创伤性脑损伤病例。根据《国际疾病分类》第十版临床修正代码对创伤性脑损伤患者进行初步识别,然后根据受伤机制和住院时间进行分层;数据收集通过查阅病历完成:在已确认的 99 名创伤性脑损伤患者中,大多数(72%)是从没有神经外科支持的外围机构转诊过来的。道路交通事故是受伤(68.7%)和死亡(75.9%)的主要原因。创伤性脑损伤分为轻度(50.5%)、中度(21.2%)和重度(28.3%)。80%转诊至神经外科的创伤性脑损伤患者在2小时内得到了诊治意见,这与死亡率无明显关系。与轻度/中度创伤性脑损伤患者相比,重度创伤性脑损伤患者收到神经外科意见和CT扫描报告的中位时间更短。CT扫描报告的延迟导致接受神经外科治疗的时间延长。大多数患者在未接受神经外科手术干预的情况下接受了治疗,而随后的神经外科干预与较高的死亡率有关(HR 6.08,P < 0.001)。住院患者死亡率为29.3%,主要是严重创伤性脑损伤(69%)。需要进行颅内压监测的患者住院死亡率较高(P < 0.001)。干预前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分恶化,通常是由于生命体征不够稳定,预示着存活率明显降低(52% vs 82%,p = 0.0019):我们队列中的创伤性脑损伤患者主要在三个方面面临延误:转诊路径过长、生命体征和颅内压稳定过晚以及最初的神经外科治疗。在资源有限的环境中,制定策略以减少这些护理延误将是降低寻求治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者神经系统发病率和死亡率的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Addressing global microneurosurgery education and laboratory training during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: from challenges to innovations. Application of the 6 pillars of sustainable global surgical partnerships by the Neurosurgery Outreach Foundation with lower-middle-income countries in Asia. Bridging global neurosurgical gaps: the potential role of medical students in Europe. Bridging the gaps in the setup of a functional epilepsy monitoring unit in Uganda to support epilepsy surgery. Building sustainable neurosurgical capacity: lessons from the Duke Division of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1