Jie Yang, Yu Liu, Wenqi Wei, Sijing Xie, Xuna Tang, Li Wu, Weibin Sun
{"title":"Delphi Study to Evaluate Competency Comprehensive Assessment System for Professional Degree of Dentistry.","authors":"Jie Yang, Yu Liu, Wenqi Wei, Sijing Xie, Xuna Tang, Li Wu, Weibin Sun","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In accordance with the two-way integration requirements of Chinese professional degree training and resident standardization training, we have gradually established a competency comprehensive assessment system (CAS) for professional postgraduate education since 2015. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific and practicality of CAS through a Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were two parts in CAS such as dissertation of clinical study and oral clinical proficiency assessment, which including formative assessment and summative assessment. A Delphi questionnaire was scheduled to assess the acceptance about two parts of CAS. Through two rounds of questioning, forty experts were invited to score for each item according to Likert-scale. The scores were analyzed and comments were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire responses rate of two rounds were 85% and 97.1%, respectively. The reliability of the results was high with Cronbach's alpha more than 0.8 and the McDonald's omega coefficients more than 0.7. Moreover, most indicators were obtained agreement with high importance mean scores and full-score rates according to the first round. However, the scores of two indicators such as clinical chairside skill examination and patients' satisfaction were relatively low. After second round, the chairside skill examination was suggested being organized after trainees' application, or conducted by the department. The recommended evaluation methods for patients' satisfaction were telephone follow-up by hospital randomly, patients' scores to student immediately, or evaluation by teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CAS integrating research assessment with clinical assessment to evaluate the clinical competency of dental students was acceptable. Most content were highly agreed by experts, indicating the possibility of further promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In accordance with the two-way integration requirements of Chinese professional degree training and resident standardization training, we have gradually established a competency comprehensive assessment system (CAS) for professional postgraduate education since 2015. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific and practicality of CAS through a Delphi study.
Methods: There were two parts in CAS such as dissertation of clinical study and oral clinical proficiency assessment, which including formative assessment and summative assessment. A Delphi questionnaire was scheduled to assess the acceptance about two parts of CAS. Through two rounds of questioning, forty experts were invited to score for each item according to Likert-scale. The scores were analyzed and comments were conducted.
Results: The questionnaire responses rate of two rounds were 85% and 97.1%, respectively. The reliability of the results was high with Cronbach's alpha more than 0.8 and the McDonald's omega coefficients more than 0.7. Moreover, most indicators were obtained agreement with high importance mean scores and full-score rates according to the first round. However, the scores of two indicators such as clinical chairside skill examination and patients' satisfaction were relatively low. After second round, the chairside skill examination was suggested being organized after trainees' application, or conducted by the department. The recommended evaluation methods for patients' satisfaction were telephone follow-up by hospital randomly, patients' scores to student immediately, or evaluation by teachers.
Conclusion: The CAS integrating research assessment with clinical assessment to evaluate the clinical competency of dental students was acceptable. Most content were highly agreed by experts, indicating the possibility of further promotion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.