Rethinking Medication Safety in Pregnancy: How Target Trial Emulation and Real-World Data Bridge the Evidence Gap

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111747
Yanhong Jessika Hu , Joanne M. Said , Jeanie L.Y. Cheong
{"title":"Rethinking Medication Safety in Pregnancy: How Target Trial Emulation and Real-World Data Bridge the Evidence Gap","authors":"Yanhong Jessika Hu ,&nbsp;Joanne M. Said ,&nbsp;Jeanie L.Y. Cheong","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The exclusion of pregnant women and infants from many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has left critical gaps in medication safety, complicating clinical decision-making during these sensitive life stages. This commentary explores target trial emulation using real-world data as a robust alternative for advancing medication safety research when RCTs are not feasible.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Target trial emulation replicates the design principles of RCTs within observational data, accounting for the dynamic nature of medication exposure across gestational stages and adjusting for time-varying confounders. While challenges such as unmeasured confounding, selection bias, and violations of positivity assumptions remain, this method provides crucial insights to address current evidence gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Information on medication exposure effects will be obtained, which will inform safer medication guidelines in pregnancy and infancy. Future research integrating artificial intelligence–driven tools, open science practices, and robust data governance frameworks will further strengthen the reliability and impact of target trial emulation. Multinational collaboration and data sharing across diverse sources will accelerate the generation of evidence, ultimately advancing medication safety.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Target trial emulation, leveraging real-world data, is a promising alternative when traditional clinical trials are not feasible. This approach promotes safer medication use and improves health outcomes for mothers and infants.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Many clinical trials exclude pregnant women and infants, leaving critical gaps in understanding medication safety during pregnancy and early life. Target trial emulation, which applies clinical trial principles to real-world data, offers a promising alternative when traditional trials are not feasible. This method allows researchers to study how medications affect pregnant women and babies at different stages of pregnancy while also considering factors that change over time. While there are still challenges, like unmeasured factors and bias remain, target trial emulation helps fill these knowledge gaps. Future advancements, including AI, Open Science, enhanced data sharing, and international collaboration, can further enhance this method's ability to improve the safety of medications for mothers and infants worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111747"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435625000800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The exclusion of pregnant women and infants from many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has left critical gaps in medication safety, complicating clinical decision-making during these sensitive life stages. This commentary explores target trial emulation using real-world data as a robust alternative for advancing medication safety research when RCTs are not feasible.

Methods

Target trial emulation replicates the design principles of RCTs within observational data, accounting for the dynamic nature of medication exposure across gestational stages and adjusting for time-varying confounders. While challenges such as unmeasured confounding, selection bias, and violations of positivity assumptions remain, this method provides crucial insights to address current evidence gaps.

Results

Information on medication exposure effects will be obtained, which will inform safer medication guidelines in pregnancy and infancy. Future research integrating artificial intelligence–driven tools, open science practices, and robust data governance frameworks will further strengthen the reliability and impact of target trial emulation. Multinational collaboration and data sharing across diverse sources will accelerate the generation of evidence, ultimately advancing medication safety.

Conclusion

Target trial emulation, leveraging real-world data, is a promising alternative when traditional clinical trials are not feasible. This approach promotes safer medication use and improves health outcomes for mothers and infants.

Plain Language Summary

Many clinical trials exclude pregnant women and infants, leaving critical gaps in understanding medication safety during pregnancy and early life. Target trial emulation, which applies clinical trial principles to real-world data, offers a promising alternative when traditional trials are not feasible. This method allows researchers to study how medications affect pregnant women and babies at different stages of pregnancy while also considering factors that change over time. While there are still challenges, like unmeasured factors and bias remain, target trial emulation helps fill these knowledge gaps. Future advancements, including AI, Open Science, enhanced data sharing, and international collaboration, can further enhance this method's ability to improve the safety of medications for mothers and infants worldwide.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高妊娠期和婴儿期的用药安全:利用真实世界数据模拟目标试验。
目的:许多随机对照试验(RCTs)将孕妇和婴儿排除在外,这在药物安全性方面留下了严重的空白,使这些敏感的生命阶段的临床决策复杂化。这篇评论探讨了使用真实世界数据的目标试验模拟,作为在随机对照试验不可行的情况下推进药物安全性研究的可靠替代方法。方法:目标试验模拟在观察性数据中复制了随机对照试验的设计原则,考虑了整个妊娠阶段药物暴露的动态性质,并对时变混杂因素进行了调整。虽然诸如无法测量的混淆、选择偏差和违反积极假设等挑战仍然存在,但该方法为解决当前证据差距提供了重要见解。产出和含义:将获得关于药物暴露影响的信息,这将为怀孕和婴儿更安全的药物指南提供信息。整合人工智能驱动工具、开放科学实践和稳健数据治理框架的未来研究将进一步加强目标试验仿真的可靠性和影响。跨国合作、跨不同来源的数据共享将加速证据的产生,最终促进药物安全。结论:利用真实世界数据的目标试验模拟在传统临床试验不可行的情况下提供了一个有希望的替代方案,促进更安全的药物使用并改善母亲和婴儿的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Cochrane evaluation of (semi-)automated review methods: protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviews Patterns of social determinants of health and their associations with health indicators: a latent class analysis A scoping review of guidance on sharing trial results with patients and the public finds inconsistent recommendations and limited methodological development External validation of dementia risk models in a United Kingdom population-based prospective cohort among stroke survivors What US medical students need to learn about clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study of US students and a global subset of guidelines developers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1