Being a nursing mentor in the intraoperative neurosurgical theatre.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Journal of perioperative practice Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1177/17504589251320824
Joana Oliveira Rosa
{"title":"Being a nursing mentor in the intraoperative neurosurgical theatre.","authors":"Joana Oliveira Rosa","doi":"10.1177/17504589251320824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For the past 20 years, nurses have mentored an increasing number of students in the operating theatre to counteract worldwide staff shortages. Still, the dual role of scrub/circulation in intraoperative nursing is challenging, particularly in neurosurgery. Moreover, theoretical intraoperative nursing remains excluded from the British nursing curricula. This study explored the nurses' lived experiences of <i>being</i> nursing mentors in the intraoperative neurosurgical theatre. Seven intraoperative neurosurgical nurses were interviewed using hermeneutic phenomenology. Data analysis followed Heidegger's hermeneutic circle, with interpretations emerging through Gadamer's fusion of horizons. The relationship between mentors, context and students led to four interlinked interpretations. Mentoring students required 'keeping too many balls in the air' due to the complexity of the context and dual clinical role. Students were considered as 'fish-out-of-water' due to their lack of basic knowledge. Expectations for students to be invested in learning - as it 'takes two to tango' - were hindered by their lack of motivation. The unpreparedness to mentor meant that most nurses 'run before they could walk'. Hence, assessment often resulted from the 'benefit of the doubt'. There seems to be a need for further academic, professional and clinical support for intraoperative neurosurgical nurses to mentor students.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"370-376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251320824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the past 20 years, nurses have mentored an increasing number of students in the operating theatre to counteract worldwide staff shortages. Still, the dual role of scrub/circulation in intraoperative nursing is challenging, particularly in neurosurgery. Moreover, theoretical intraoperative nursing remains excluded from the British nursing curricula. This study explored the nurses' lived experiences of being nursing mentors in the intraoperative neurosurgical theatre. Seven intraoperative neurosurgical nurses were interviewed using hermeneutic phenomenology. Data analysis followed Heidegger's hermeneutic circle, with interpretations emerging through Gadamer's fusion of horizons. The relationship between mentors, context and students led to four interlinked interpretations. Mentoring students required 'keeping too many balls in the air' due to the complexity of the context and dual clinical role. Students were considered as 'fish-out-of-water' due to their lack of basic knowledge. Expectations for students to be invested in learning - as it 'takes two to tango' - were hindered by their lack of motivation. The unpreparedness to mentor meant that most nurses 'run before they could walk'. Hence, assessment often resulted from the 'benefit of the doubt'. There seems to be a need for further academic, professional and clinical support for intraoperative neurosurgical nurses to mentor students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成为神经外科术中手术室的护理导师。
在过去的20年里,护士在手术室指导了越来越多的学生,以应对全球范围内的人员短缺。然而,搓洗/循环在术中护理中的双重作用是具有挑战性的,特别是在神经外科。此外,理论术中护理仍然被排除在英国护理课程之外。本研究探讨神经外科手术室护士在术中担任护理导师的生活经验。采用解释学现象学对7名术中神经外科护士进行了访谈。数据分析遵循海德格尔的解释学循环,通过伽达默尔的视界融合来解释。导师、情境和学生之间的关系导致了四种相互关联的解释。由于环境的复杂性和双重临床角色,指导学生需要“保持太多的注意力”。由于缺乏基本知识,学生们被认为是“离水的鱼”。对学生投入学习的期望——就像“探戈需要两个人来跳”一样——由于缺乏动力而受到阻碍。对导师的不准备意味着大多数护士“还不会走就会跑”。因此,评估往往源于“无罪推定”。似乎需要进一步的学术,专业和临床支持,以指导术中神经外科护士的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
期刊最新文献
Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate. Comparative evaluation of first-attempt intubation success rate using direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade and video laryngoscope during rapid sequence induction in patients undergoing emergency surgery: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Compliance with care standards and professional knowledge of operating theatre personnel before, during and after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A study in public hospitals in Iran. Efficacy of the intravenous formulation of fentanyl citrate administered orally as premedication in paediatric patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. Effect of different doses of oral olanzapine to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1