Effect of different doses of oral olanzapine to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial.

Amani H Abdel-Wahab, Ghada M Abo Elfad, Ahmed Mohamed Aboelfadl, Mustafa Bahloul, Marwa Mahmoud Abdel Rady
{"title":"Effect of different doses of oral olanzapine to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Amani H Abdel-Wahab, Ghada M Abo Elfad, Ahmed Mohamed Aboelfadl, Mustafa Bahloul, Marwa Mahmoud Abdel Rady","doi":"10.1177/17504589241308820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of oral 10 and 5 mg olanzapine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Notably, 135 female patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, classed as American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II, who underwent elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups (45 each) to receive perioperative 5 or 10 mg oral olanzapine (OL5 and OL10 groups), or a placebo (in the control group). Postoperation, we recorded the occurrence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 h, the number of patients who received antiemetics and any associated side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative nausea was more prevalent in the control group (23 patients) than in OL5 and OL10 groups (13 and three patients, respectively); Group OL10 had the lowest severity of nausea. There was no incidence of vomiting in the OL10 group, and only one patient required antiemetics; in the OL5 group, three patients required antiemetics and eight patients in the control group needed antiemetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olanzapine 10 mg had a higher effect than the lower concentration of 5 mg or control in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589241308820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241308820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of oral 10 and 5 mg olanzapine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Methods: Notably, 135 female patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, classed as American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II, who underwent elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups (45 each) to receive perioperative 5 or 10 mg oral olanzapine (OL5 and OL10 groups), or a placebo (in the control group). Postoperation, we recorded the occurrence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 h, the number of patients who received antiemetics and any associated side effects.

Results: Postoperative nausea was more prevalent in the control group (23 patients) than in OL5 and OL10 groups (13 and three patients, respectively); Group OL10 had the lowest severity of nausea. There was no incidence of vomiting in the OL10 group, and only one patient required antiemetics; in the OL5 group, three patients required antiemetics and eight patients in the control group needed antiemetics.

Conclusion: Olanzapine 10 mg had a higher effect than the lower concentration of 5 mg or control in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 24 h.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量口服奥氮平预防高危患者腹腔镜术后恶心呕吐的效果:一项随机对照试验
背景:我们进行了这项研究,比较口服10mg和5mg奥氮平预防术后恶心和呕吐的疗效。方法:值得注意的是,135名年龄在18岁至50岁之间的女性患者,被归类为美国麻醉学会I和II,在全麻下接受选择性腹腔镜妇科手术,随机分为三组(每组45人),分别接受围手术期口服5或10 mg奥氮平(OL5和OL10组)或安慰剂(对照组)。术后记录患者术后24 h内恶心呕吐的发生情况、严重程度、使用止吐药的患者人数及相关副作用。结果:对照组(23例)术后恶心发生率高于OL5组(13例)和OL10组(3例);OL10组的恶心程度最低。OL10组无呕吐发生,只有1例患者需要止吐药;OL5组3例患者需要止吐剂,对照组8例患者需要止吐剂。结论:奥氮平10 mg在降低术后24 h恶心呕吐发生率方面优于低浓度5 mg或对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
期刊最新文献
The role of wearable devices in pre-anaesthesia check-up facilitation: A scoping review. Nurse education on sedation management in ECMO: A small-group training approach. Perioperative anaesthetic management of a massive solitary fibrous tumour of the pleura: A case report. Beneath the surface: A historical exploration of trepanation practices across cultures and eras. Perioperative surveillance of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients with hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1