A comprehensive transplanting of black-box adversarial attacks from multi-class to multi-label models

IF 5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Complex & Intelligent Systems Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s40747-025-01805-z
Zhijian Chen, Qi Zhou, Yujiang Liu, Wenjian Luo
{"title":"A comprehensive transplanting of black-box adversarial attacks from multi-class to multi-label models","authors":"Zhijian Chen, Qi Zhou, Yujiang Liu, Wenjian Luo","doi":"10.1007/s40747-025-01805-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adversarial examples generated by perturbing raw data with carefully designed, imperceptible noise have emerged as a primary security threat to artificial intelligence systems. In particular, black-box adversarial attack algorithms, which only rely on model input and output to generate adversarial examples, are easy to implement in real scenarios. However, previous research on black-box attacks has primarily focused on multi-class classification models, with relatively few studies on black-box attack algorithms for multi-label classification models. Multi-label classification models exhibit significant differences from multi-class classification models in terms of structure and output. The former can assign multiple labels to a single sample, with these labels often exhibiting correlations, while the latter classifies a sample as the class with the highest confidence. Therefore, existing multi-class attack algorithms cannot directly attack multi-label classification models. In this paper, we study the transplantation methods of multi-class black-box attack algorithms to multi-label classification models and propose the multi-label versions for eight classic black-box attack algorithms, which include three score-based attacks and five decision-based (label-only) attacks, for the first time. Experimental results indicate that the transplanted black-box attack algorithms demonstrate effective attack performance across various attack types, except for extreme attacks. Especially, most transplanted attack algorithms achieve more than 60% success rate on the ML-GCN model and more than 30% on the ML-LIW model under the hiding all attack type. However, the performance of these transplanted attack algorithms shows variation among different attack types due to the correlations between labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10524,"journal":{"name":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-025-01805-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adversarial examples generated by perturbing raw data with carefully designed, imperceptible noise have emerged as a primary security threat to artificial intelligence systems. In particular, black-box adversarial attack algorithms, which only rely on model input and output to generate adversarial examples, are easy to implement in real scenarios. However, previous research on black-box attacks has primarily focused on multi-class classification models, with relatively few studies on black-box attack algorithms for multi-label classification models. Multi-label classification models exhibit significant differences from multi-class classification models in terms of structure and output. The former can assign multiple labels to a single sample, with these labels often exhibiting correlations, while the latter classifies a sample as the class with the highest confidence. Therefore, existing multi-class attack algorithms cannot directly attack multi-label classification models. In this paper, we study the transplantation methods of multi-class black-box attack algorithms to multi-label classification models and propose the multi-label versions for eight classic black-box attack algorithms, which include three score-based attacks and five decision-based (label-only) attacks, for the first time. Experimental results indicate that the transplanted black-box attack algorithms demonstrate effective attack performance across various attack types, except for extreme attacks. Especially, most transplanted attack algorithms achieve more than 60% success rate on the ML-GCN model and more than 30% on the ML-LIW model under the hiding all attack type. However, the performance of these transplanted attack algorithms shows variation among different attack types due to the correlations between labels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Complex & Intelligent Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
297
期刊介绍: Complex & Intelligent Systems aims to provide a forum for presenting and discussing novel approaches, tools and techniques meant for attaining a cross-fertilization between the broad fields of complex systems, computational simulation, and intelligent analytics and visualization. The transdisciplinary research that the journal focuses on will expand the boundaries of our understanding by investigating the principles and processes that underlie many of the most profound problems facing society today.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive transplanting of black-box adversarial attacks from multi-class to multi-label models Enhancing geometric modeling in convolutional neural networks: limit deformable convolution CycleGuardian: a framework for automatic respiratory sound classification based on improved deep clustering and contrastive learning Small sample smart contract vulnerability detection method based on multi-layer feature fusion Decentralized non-convex online optimization with adaptive momentum estimation and quantized communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1