Emergency department visits and hospitalizations after a diagnosis of angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA)

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.02.021
Shubh Patel , Marinda Fung BLT , Shuvam Prasai BHSc , Sonia Butalia MD, FRCPC, MSc , Todd J. Anderson MD
{"title":"Emergency department visits and hospitalizations after a diagnosis of angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA)","authors":"Shubh Patel ,&nbsp;Marinda Fung BLT ,&nbsp;Shuvam Prasai BHSc ,&nbsp;Sonia Butalia MD, FRCPC, MSc ,&nbsp;Todd J. Anderson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) presents diagnostic and treatment challenges, significantly burdening healthcare resources. This study assessed emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations and factors associated with these outcomes following ANOCA and stable angina (SA) with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnoses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort of individuals who had their first invasive cardiac catheterization for chest pain in Alberta from 2002 to 2017 was extracted retrospectively from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated for ED visits and hospitalizations, while factors associated with these outcomes were analyzed using Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our analysis included 28,881 individuals (ANOCA, 36%). Two-year postcatheterization IRs of ED visits were 100.3-119.3 per 1,000 person-years for ANOCA and increased over time (unstandardized beta coefficient [b] = 2.19 per biennium [95% CI 0.83-3.55]; <em>P</em> = .008); for SA with obstructive CAD the IRs were 209.3-240.2 per 1,000 person-years and remained stable (b = −1.83 per biennium [95% CI −5.73 to 1.70]; <em>P</em> = .25). IRs of hospitalizations were 12.4-25.8 per 1,000 person-years and stable for ANOCA (b = −0.93 per biennium [95% CI −2.49 to 0.64]; <em>P</em> = .20); for SA with obstructive CAD, they were 106.4-171.4 per 1,000 person-years and decreased over time (b = −9.02 per biennium [95% CI −13.27 to −4.77; <em>P</em> = .002). A previous history of heart failure was most associated with ED visits (HR = 1.74 [95% CI 1.41-2.14]; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and hospitalizations (HR = 2.40 [95% CI 1.82-3.18]; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) for ANOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ED visits for ANOCA have risen over time while hospitalizations remain stable, indicating a growing burden despite generally lower rates than SA with obstructive CAD. These findings underscore the need for more effective management strategies to address the significant morbidity and resource utilization in ANOCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"285 ","pages":"Pages 82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) presents diagnostic and treatment challenges, significantly burdening healthcare resources. This study assessed emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations and factors associated with these outcomes following ANOCA and stable angina (SA) with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnoses.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of individuals who had their first invasive cardiac catheterization for chest pain in Alberta from 2002 to 2017 was extracted retrospectively from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated for ED visits and hospitalizations, while factors associated with these outcomes were analyzed using Cox models.

Results

Our analysis included 28,881 individuals (ANOCA, 36%). Two-year postcatheterization IRs of ED visits were 100.3-119.3 per 1,000 person-years for ANOCA and increased over time (unstandardized beta coefficient [b] = 2.19 per biennium [95% CI 0.83-3.55]; P = .008); for SA with obstructive CAD the IRs were 209.3-240.2 per 1,000 person-years and remained stable (b = −1.83 per biennium [95% CI −5.73 to 1.70]; P = .25). IRs of hospitalizations were 12.4-25.8 per 1,000 person-years and stable for ANOCA (b = −0.93 per biennium [95% CI −2.49 to 0.64]; P = .20); for SA with obstructive CAD, they were 106.4-171.4 per 1,000 person-years and decreased over time (b = −9.02 per biennium [95% CI −13.27 to −4.77; P = .002). A previous history of heart failure was most associated with ED visits (HR = 1.74 [95% CI 1.41-2.14]; P < .001) and hospitalizations (HR = 2.40 [95% CI 1.82-3.18]; P < .001) for ANOCA.

Conclusions

ED visits for ANOCA have risen over time while hospitalizations remain stable, indicating a growing burden despite generally lower rates than SA with obstructive CAD. These findings underscore the need for more effective management strategies to address the significant morbidity and resource utilization in ANOCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断心绞痛后无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)的急诊就诊和住院情况。
无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)心绞痛提出了诊断和治疗的挑战,显著负担医疗资源。本研究评估了ANOCA和稳定性心绞痛(SA)合并阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)诊断后的急诊科(ED)就诊和住院情况,以及与这些结果相关的因素。方法:从阿尔伯塔省冠心病结局评估项目(APPROACH)数据库中回顾性提取2002年至2017年在阿尔伯塔省因胸痛首次行有创心导管术的个体。计算急诊科就诊和住院的发病率(IRs),并使用Cox模型分析与这些结果相关的因素。结果:我们的分析包括28,881人(ANOCA, 36%)。ANOCA患者置管后两年ED就诊的ir为100.3-119.3 / 1000人年,并随着时间的推移而增加(非标准化β系数[b]=2.19 /两年[95%CI 0.83-3.55];p=0.008);SA合并阻塞性CAD的ir为209.3-240.2 / 1000人年,保持稳定(b=-1.83 /两年[95% CI -5.73 - 1.70];p = 0.25)。住院率为12.4-25.8 / 1000人年,ANOCA的住院率稳定(b=-0.93 /两年[95% CI -2.49-0.64];p=0.20);对于伴有阻塞性CAD的SA,其死亡率为106.4-171.4 / 1000人年,并随着时间的推移而下降(b=-9.02 /两年)[95% CI -13.27至-4.77;p = 0.002)。既往心力衰竭史与急诊科就诊最相关(HR= 1.74 [95% CI 1.41-2.14];结论:ANOCA的ED就诊次数随着时间的推移而增加,而住院率保持稳定,表明尽管与SA合并阻塞性CAD相比,ANOCA的发生率普遍较低,但其负担仍在增加。这些发现强调需要更有效的管理策略来解决ANOCA的显著发病率和资源利用问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Design and rationale of a multicenter paramedic randomized trial of noradrenaline versus adrenaline in the initial management of patients with cardiogenic shock—The PANDA trial Integration of a task strengthening strategy for hypertension management into HIV care in Nigeria: Baseline characteristics of participants in a cluster randomized controlled trial Design and rationale of the COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial: An all-comers head-to-head comparison of Evolut FX+ and Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia transcatheter heart valves Remote dietitian counseling with short-term meal delivery improves DASH diet adherence and lowers blood pressure in veterans with hypertension and obesity Operator radiation exposure comparing left-radial artery and right-radial artery approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1