Continuity of care in a pandemic: an observational study in GP-centred healthcare in Germany.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002944
Gunter Laux, Michel Wensing, Attila Altiner, Ruediger Leutgeb
{"title":"Continuity of care in a pandemic: an observational study in GP-centred healthcare in Germany.","authors":"Gunter Laux, Michel Wensing, Attila Altiner, Ruediger Leutgeb","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of care (COC) refers to the sustained quality of healthcare over time and is a central element of effective general practice. High levels of COC have been associated with improved health outcomes, including reduced risks of hospitalisation. Previous research demonstrated that participation in Germany's \"general practitioner-centred healthcare\" (GPCHC) programme, designed to strengthen general practice care, led to higher COC. Furthermore, higher COC was independently linked to decreased risks of hospitalisations, including rehospitalisations and avoidable admissions. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of COC for GPCHC patients persisted in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with 2019, the year preceding the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted in Germany using data from a health insurance database. The study included two patient cohorts: those enrolled in the GPCHC programme (n=1 049 910) and those not enrolled in GPCHC (n=537 759) for both 2019 and 2020. The analysis compared three measures of COC-Usual Provider Index, Herfindahl Index and Sequential Continuity Index-adjusted for patient characteristics. Longitudinal multivariable regression models were employed to evaluate differences between the cohorts and assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on COC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For GPCHC patients, COC in general practice was relevantly and significantly higher with respect to the three COC measures in 2019. We could observe the same advantage for GPCHC patients in 2020. Interestingly, for the SCI index, indicating the fraction of sequential encounter pairs at which the same provider is seen, we could observe that COC was even more advantageous for GPCHC patients in 2020 in comparison to 2019. Finally, we could observe that higher COC in 2019 was independently associated with decreased healthcare utilisation of the inpatient care sector in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a pandemic period in which healthcare is faced with new challenges, both for patients and healthcare providers, GPCHC was still associated with higher COC. The GPCHC programme and its contents are obviously better up to the requirements of the COC even in such a situation of pandemic-induced discontinuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care (COC) refers to the sustained quality of healthcare over time and is a central element of effective general practice. High levels of COC have been associated with improved health outcomes, including reduced risks of hospitalisation. Previous research demonstrated that participation in Germany's "general practitioner-centred healthcare" (GPCHC) programme, designed to strengthen general practice care, led to higher COC. Furthermore, higher COC was independently linked to decreased risks of hospitalisations, including rehospitalisations and avoidable admissions. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of COC for GPCHC patients persisted in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with 2019, the year preceding the pandemic.

Methods: An observational study was conducted in Germany using data from a health insurance database. The study included two patient cohorts: those enrolled in the GPCHC programme (n=1 049 910) and those not enrolled in GPCHC (n=537 759) for both 2019 and 2020. The analysis compared three measures of COC-Usual Provider Index, Herfindahl Index and Sequential Continuity Index-adjusted for patient characteristics. Longitudinal multivariable regression models were employed to evaluate differences between the cohorts and assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on COC outcomes.

Results: For GPCHC patients, COC in general practice was relevantly and significantly higher with respect to the three COC measures in 2019. We could observe the same advantage for GPCHC patients in 2020. Interestingly, for the SCI index, indicating the fraction of sequential encounter pairs at which the same provider is seen, we could observe that COC was even more advantageous for GPCHC patients in 2020 in comparison to 2019. Finally, we could observe that higher COC in 2019 was independently associated with decreased healthcare utilisation of the inpatient care sector in 2020.

Conclusions: In a pandemic period in which healthcare is faced with new challenges, both for patients and healthcare providers, GPCHC was still associated with higher COC. The GPCHC programme and its contents are obviously better up to the requirements of the COC even in such a situation of pandemic-induced discontinuity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间护理的连续性:德国以gdp为中心的医疗保健的观察性研究。
背景:护理的连续性(COC)是指随着时间的推移持续的医疗质量,是有效的全科实践的核心要素。高水平的COC与改善健康结果有关,包括降低住院风险。先前的研究表明,参与德国“以全科医生为中心的医疗保健”(GPCHC)计划,旨在加强全科医生的护理,导致更高的COC。此外,较高的COC与住院风险降低(包括再住院和可避免的入院)独立相关。本研究旨在调查与2019年(大流行前一年)相比,COC对GPCHC患者的益处在2020年(COVID-19大流行的第一年)是否持续。方法:在德国使用健康保险数据库中的数据进行了一项观察性研究。该研究包括两组患者:2019年和2020年参加GPCHC项目的患者(n= 1049910)和未参加GPCHC项目的患者(n= 537759)。分析比较了coc -常规提供者指数、Herfindahl指数和顺序连续性指数的三种测量方法,并对患者特征进行了调整。采用纵向多变量回归模型来评估队列之间的差异,并评估COVID-19大流行对COC结局的影响。结果:2019年,GPCHC患者的COC与三项COC措施相关且显著升高。我们可以在2020年观察到GPCHC患者同样的优势。有趣的是,对于SCI指数(表示在同一医疗机构看到的连续就诊对的比例),我们可以观察到,与2019年相比,2020年COC对GPCHC患者更有利。最后,我们可以观察到,2019年较高的COC与2020年住院护理部门医疗保健利用率下降独立相关。结论:在卫生保健面临新挑战的大流行时期,无论对患者还是医疗保健提供者,GPCHC仍与较高的COC相关。即使在这种大流行导致的不连续性的情况下,GPCHC规划及其内容也明显更好地符合准则的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of establishing a comprehensive tobacco cessation service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project. 'Situation awareness' in midwifery practice: a scoping review. Achieving effective and timely quality of care in same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty without compromising patient safety. Patient safety culture and associated factors among healthcare professionals at public hospitals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Identifying health economic competencies for quality improvement practitioners and educators: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1