What Risk Factors Are Associated With Recurrent Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation? A Meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000003430
Yan-Hong Lin, Jin Lin, Jia-Yun Xu, Bing-Xin Lai, Min-Hao He, Ying-Ru Zhu, Ya-Li Pang, Li Dong, Jun-Hao Li, Sheng-Sheng Zhao, Yu-Zhi Lin, Rui-Zhong Li, Hai-Yan Yao, Dao-Chen Liang
{"title":"What Risk Factors Are Associated With Recurrent Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation? A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yan-Hong Lin, Jin Lin, Jia-Yun Xu, Bing-Xin Lai, Min-Hao He, Ying-Ru Zhu, Ya-Li Pang, Li Dong, Jun-Hao Li, Sheng-Sheng Zhao, Yu-Zhi Lin, Rui-Zhong Li, Hai-Yan Yao, Dao-Chen Liang","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has been extensively treated clinically using percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), which includes percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty. Postoperative refracture is a common complication after PVA, but the associated factors and specific mechanisms behind these fractures are not entirely clear.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we asked: What factors were associated with increased or decreased odds of refracture after PVA for OVCF?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for the time period from database inception to August 31, 2024 (which also was when we last searched). We included case-control studies in which participants were patients with OVCF and were treated with PVA, grouped into refracture versus non-refracture groups based on the presence or absence of refracture. We excluded studies published on preprint servers, conference reports, case reports, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. We collected 2398 records in the database. After excluding studies that were duplicates and did not meet the inclusion criteria, we included 22 studies involving 7132 participants, 75% (5368) of whom were women, with a mean age of 76 years for patients in the refracture group and 74 years for patients in the non-refracture group. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with which we assessed three aspects of the study; the mean ± SD score for the included studies was 7.3 ± 0.7 of 9 total (on this scale, higher scores are better), representing generally high study quality. The determination of heterogeneity relied on I 2 and chi-square test, and we used a random-effects model when the I 2 was > 50% and p ≤ 0.05; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was chosen. According to the Egger test and trim and fill method, publication bias did not significantly affect most of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined results showed that older age (mean difference 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 3.23]; p < 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.72 [95% CI -0.99 to -0.45]; p < 0.001), greater preoperative AP vertebral height ratio (SMD 0.26 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.45]; p = 0.01), greater preoperative kyphotic angle (KA) (SMD 0.47 [95% CI 0.10 to 0.83]; p = 0.01), bone cement leakage (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.84]; p = 0.02), multivertebral fractures (OR 3.58 [95% CI 2.53 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), smoking (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.16 to 2.02]; p = 0.003), use of glucocorticoids (OR 3.18 [95% CI 2.09 to 4.84]; p < 0.001), and previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.58 to 4.13]; p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of refractures after surgery. Use of antiosteoporosis therapy was associated with a decreased odds of postoperative refracture (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.64]; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of our meta-analysis, surgeons can identify those who are more likely to have refracture by knowing basic information about their patients preoperatively, such as advanced age, lower BMD, greater preoperative AP ratio, greater preoperative KA, and the presence of multivertebral fractures or previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Also, intraoperative reduction of bone cement leakage and postoperative counseling of patients to quit smoking, reduce glucocorticoid use, and administration of antiosteoporosis therapy were used to reduce the probability of refracture. The association between some factors and refracture is uncertain, such as BMI and thoracolumbar fracture, and further studies are needed.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1528-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has been extensively treated clinically using percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), which includes percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty. Postoperative refracture is a common complication after PVA, but the associated factors and specific mechanisms behind these fractures are not entirely clear.

Questions/purposes: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we asked: What factors were associated with increased or decreased odds of refracture after PVA for OVCF?

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for the time period from database inception to August 31, 2024 (which also was when we last searched). We included case-control studies in which participants were patients with OVCF and were treated with PVA, grouped into refracture versus non-refracture groups based on the presence or absence of refracture. We excluded studies published on preprint servers, conference reports, case reports, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. We collected 2398 records in the database. After excluding studies that were duplicates and did not meet the inclusion criteria, we included 22 studies involving 7132 participants, 75% (5368) of whom were women, with a mean age of 76 years for patients in the refracture group and 74 years for patients in the non-refracture group. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with which we assessed three aspects of the study; the mean ± SD score for the included studies was 7.3 ± 0.7 of 9 total (on this scale, higher scores are better), representing generally high study quality. The determination of heterogeneity relied on I 2 and chi-square test, and we used a random-effects model when the I 2 was > 50% and p ≤ 0.05; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was chosen. According to the Egger test and trim and fill method, publication bias did not significantly affect most of our results.

Results: The combined results showed that older age (mean difference 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 3.23]; p < 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.72 [95% CI -0.99 to -0.45]; p < 0.001), greater preoperative AP vertebral height ratio (SMD 0.26 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.45]; p = 0.01), greater preoperative kyphotic angle (KA) (SMD 0.47 [95% CI 0.10 to 0.83]; p = 0.01), bone cement leakage (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.84]; p = 0.02), multivertebral fractures (OR 3.58 [95% CI 2.53 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), smoking (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.16 to 2.02]; p = 0.003), use of glucocorticoids (OR 3.18 [95% CI 2.09 to 4.84]; p < 0.001), and previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.58 to 4.13]; p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of refractures after surgery. Use of antiosteoporosis therapy was associated with a decreased odds of postoperative refracture (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.64]; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, surgeons can identify those who are more likely to have refracture by knowing basic information about their patients preoperatively, such as advanced age, lower BMD, greater preoperative AP ratio, greater preoperative KA, and the presence of multivertebral fractures or previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Also, intraoperative reduction of bone cement leakage and postoperative counseling of patients to quit smoking, reduce glucocorticoid use, and administration of antiosteoporosis therapy were used to reduce the probability of refracture. The association between some factors and refracture is uncertain, such as BMI and thoracolumbar fracture, and further studies are needed.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮椎体增强术后骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折复发的危险因素是什么?一个荟萃分析。
背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)在临床上广泛应用经皮椎体增强术(PVA)治疗,包括经皮椎体后凸成形术和经皮椎体成形术。术后再骨折是PVA术后常见的并发症,但这些骨折背后的相关因素和具体机制尚不完全清楚。问题/目的:在一项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们提出:哪些因素与OVCF PVA术后再骨折发生率的增加或降低相关?方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南,我们对Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science和Embase进行了从数据库建立到2024年8月31日(这也是我们最后一次搜索的时间)的全面搜索。我们纳入了病例对照研究,其中参与者为OVCF患者,并接受PVA治疗,根据是否存在再折射分为再折射组和非再折射组。我们排除了发表在预印本服务器、会议报告、病例报告、系统评价或荟萃分析上的研究。我们在数据库中收集了2398条记录。在排除重复和不符合纳入标准的研究后,我们纳入了22项研究,涉及7132名受试者,其中75%(5368)为女性,再骨折组患者的平均年龄为76岁,非再骨折组患者的平均年龄为74岁。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估,我们评估了研究的三个方面;纳入研究的平均±SD评分为7.3±0.7分(总分为9分)(在此量表中得分越高越好),表明研究质量总体较高。异质性的判定依靠I2和卡方检验,当I2为> 50%且p≤0.05时,我们采用随机效应模型;否则,选择固定效应模型。根据Egger检验和trim and fill方法,发表偏倚对我们的大多数结果没有显著影响。结果:综合结果显示,年龄较大(平均差2.24[95%可信区间(CI) 1.25 ~ 3.23];p < 0.001),较低的骨密度(BMD)(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.72 [95% CI -0.99至-0.45];p < 0.001),较高的术前AP椎体高度比(SMD = 0.26 [95% CI = 0.07 ~ 0.45];p = 0.01),术前后凸角(KA)增大(SMD 0.47 [95% CI 0.10 ~ 0.83];p = 0.01),骨水泥渗漏(OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.84];p = 0.02),多椎体骨折(OR 3.58 [95% CI 2.53 ~ 5.07];p < 0.001),吸烟(OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.16 ~ 2.02];p = 0.003),使用糖皮质激素(OR 3.18 [95% CI 2.09 ~ 4.84];p < 0.001),既往骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.58至4.13];P < 0.001)与术后复发几率增加相关。使用抗骨质疏松治疗与术后再骨折发生率降低相关(OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.24 - 0.64];P < 0.001)。结论:根据我们的meta分析结果,外科医生可以通过术前了解患者的基本信息,如年龄较大、骨密度较低、术前AP比较大、术前KA较大、是否存在多椎体骨折或既往骨质疏松性椎体骨折,来识别哪些患者更容易发生再骨折。术中减少骨水泥渗漏,术后建议患者戒烟,减少糖皮质激素的使用,并给予抗骨质疏松治疗,以降低再骨折的可能性。一些因素与再骨折的关系尚不确定,如BMI和胸腰椎骨折,需要进一步研究。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism With Aspirin Prophylaxis After THA for High-riding Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective, Comparative Study. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Is the Completion of a Research Gap Year or Summer Research Program Associated With Increased Odds of Matching Into Orthopaedic Residency? A Systematic Review. CORR Insights®: Women Are Unequally Represented Among Clinical Trial Leadership by Orthopaedic Subspecialty. Is Functional Reconstruction Feasible With Modified Hip Transposition Using a Customized 3D-printed Femoral Prosthesis After Pelvic Tumor Resection? A Preliminary Study. CORR Insights®: Severe Damage to the Ligamentous-Fossa-Foveolar Complex Is Common in Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Dislocation for Femoroacetabular Impingement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1