A Comparison of the Effects of Sevoflurane, Propofol, and Propofol Combined with Butorphanol in Suppressing Sufentanil-Induced cough-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S492641
Haoyu Ji, Fazhong Zhang, Ming Yang, Xiaomei Xu, Yuanming Sun, Xiaoqiong Xia, Yuanhai Li
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effects of Sevoflurane, Propofol, and Propofol Combined with Butorphanol in Suppressing Sufentanil-Induced cough-A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Haoyu Ji, Fazhong Zhang, Ming Yang, Xiaomei Xu, Yuanming Sun, Xiaoqiong Xia, Yuanhai Li","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S492641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the safety and efficacy of sevoflurane pretreatment in preventing sufentanil-induced cough in children and to compare its antitussive effect with that of butorphanol, an opioid analgesic that has been proven effective in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 174 patients who underwent ENT surgery at Chaohu Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University were enrolled and divided into groups S, C and B, with 58 patients in each group, according to the random number table method. General anesthesia was induced with 5% sevoflurane in Group S, 2.5 mg/kg of propofol and 30 μg/kg of butorphanol in Group B, and 2.5 mg/kg of propofol and 1 mL of normal saline in Group C. The cough grade, intraoperative hemodynamic data, blood oxygen saturation, and adverse reactions within 24 h after the operation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cough grade significantly differed among the 3 groups (P<0.05). Compared with those of Group C, the cough grades of Groups S and B were significantly lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the cough grade between Group S and Group B (P>0.05). Groups S and B cannot be considered equivalent. There were no significant differences in the MAP, HR, SpO2 or BIS value among the three groups at different time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, dizziness or chills among the 3 groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Induction of anesthesia using 5% sevoflurane to reduce Bis to 60 in children significantly reduces the probability of sufentanil-induced coughing (SIC) without significant hemodynamic fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"1347-1355"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S492641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of sevoflurane pretreatment in preventing sufentanil-induced cough in children and to compare its antitussive effect with that of butorphanol, an opioid analgesic that has been proven effective in clinical trials.

Data and methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 174 patients who underwent ENT surgery at Chaohu Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University were enrolled and divided into groups S, C and B, with 58 patients in each group, according to the random number table method. General anesthesia was induced with 5% sevoflurane in Group S, 2.5 mg/kg of propofol and 30 μg/kg of butorphanol in Group B, and 2.5 mg/kg of propofol and 1 mL of normal saline in Group C. The cough grade, intraoperative hemodynamic data, blood oxygen saturation, and adverse reactions within 24 h after the operation were recorded.

Results: The overall cough grade significantly differed among the 3 groups (P<0.05). Compared with those of Group C, the cough grades of Groups S and B were significantly lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the cough grade between Group S and Group B (P>0.05). Groups S and B cannot be considered equivalent. There were no significant differences in the MAP, HR, SpO2 or BIS value among the three groups at different time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, dizziness or chills among the 3 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Induction of anesthesia using 5% sevoflurane to reduce Bis to 60 in children significantly reduces the probability of sufentanil-induced coughing (SIC) without significant hemodynamic fluctuations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
七氟醚、异丙酚及异丙酚联合丁托啡诺抑制舒芬太尼致咳嗽的疗效比较——随机对照试验。
目的:研究七氟醚预处理预防舒芬太尼致儿童咳嗽的安全性和有效性,并与临床试验证实有效的阿片类镇痛药布托啡诺进行比较。资料与方法:前瞻性随机对照试验。选取在安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院行耳鼻喉外科手术的患者174例,采用随机数字表法分为S、C、B组,每组58例。S组采用5%七氟醚全麻,B组采用2.5 mg/kg异丙酚和30 μg/kg丁托酚,c组采用2.5 mg/kg异丙酚和1 mL生理盐水,记录术后24 h内咳嗽程度、术中血流动力学、血氧饱和度及不良反应。结果:三组患者整体咳嗽分级差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。S组和B组不能被认为是等同的。三组患者在不同时间点的MAP、HR、SpO2、BIS值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三组患者术后恶心、呕吐、头晕、寒战发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:5%七氟醚诱导麻醉使儿童Bis降至60,可显著降低舒芬太尼诱发咳嗽(SIC)的概率,且无明显血流动力学波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
期刊最新文献
Platelet-Rich Plasma Attenuates Knee Osteoarthritis in Rats via Modulation of Gut Microbiota. A Comparison of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil for Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Efimosfermin for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH): Mechanism of Action, Clinical Development and Emerging Therapeutic Potential. Targeted Therapy for Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Evolution and Future Directions. Topical Airway Lidocaine Spray Reduces the 95% Effective Dose of Sufentanil for Blunting Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation in Elderly Patients: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1