Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S498337
Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Yiting Hu, Zhanjun Dong, Yang Liu, Wanjun Bai
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Yiting Hu, Zhanjun Dong, Yang Liu, Wanjun Bai","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S498337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>), and the area under the curve from time zero to observed infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat fell within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% in both groups. Both formulations were well tolerated by participants, with no serious adverse events reported throughout the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"1853-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S498337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application.

Subjects and methods: The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study.

Results: The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and the area under the curve from time zero to observed infinity (AUC0-∞) of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat fell within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% in both groups. Both formulations were well tolerated by participants, with no serious adverse events reported throughout the trial.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨氯地平加贝那普利单丸胶囊制剂在空腹和空腹条件下的生物等效性研究。
背景:本研究旨在评价试验用氨氯地平/苯那普利胶囊在空腹和空腹两种状态下的药代动力学特性和安全性,确定两种制剂的生物等效性,为新药的应用提供充分的依据。受试者和方法:生物等效性研究采用随机、开放标签设计,涉及两种单剂量制剂。符合资格标准的健康中国受试者被给予单剂量的氨氯地平/苯那普利胶囊。在给药后168小时内连续采血,采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)方法测定氨氯地平、苯那普利和苯那普利的血浆水平。为了进行生物等效性评价,计算受试药物的药代动力学参数与参比药物的药代动力学参数的几何平均比值及其对应的90%置信区间。在整个研究期间进行了安全性评估。结果:在禁食和饲喂条件下,试验制剂的PK参数与参比制剂相当。两组氨氯地平、苯那普利和苯那普利的峰值浓度(Cmax)、从时间0到最后可测浓度(AUC0-t)的曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)、从时间0到观测无穷远的曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)的几何平均比值的90%置信区间(CIs)均在80.00% ~ 125.00%的范围内。参与者对两种制剂均有良好的耐受性,在整个试验过程中未报告严重的不良事件。结论:在空腹和进食状态下,试验制剂与对照制剂在健康个体体内的药代动力学生物等效性均得到证实,符合本研究制定的监管标准。两种药物配方均显示出安全性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
期刊最新文献
Obacunone Promotes Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury by Attenuating Neuroinflammation by Targeting the TLR4/MyD88/p38 MAPK Pathway. Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Force in Pharmaceutical Innovation: Transforming Discovery, Development, and Manufacturing. Medicinal Plants That Modulate Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity: Implications in Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Baicalin as a Multifunctional Regulator of Gut Health: Integrative Mechanisms Involving Inflammation, Barrier Integrity, and Gut-Organ Axis. Stachydrine: A Systematic Review of Its Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Potential in Cardiovascular, Oncology, Renal, Gynecological, and Inflammatory Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1