Multimodal machine learning-based model for differentiating nontuberculous mycobacteria from mycobacterium tuberculosis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1470072
Hong-Ling Li, Ri-Zeng Zhi, Hua-Sheng Liu, Mei Wang, Si-Jie Yu
{"title":"Multimodal machine learning-based model for differentiating nontuberculous mycobacteria from <i>mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.","authors":"Hong-Ling Li, Ri-Zeng Zhi, Hua-Sheng Liu, Mei Wang, Si-Jie Yu","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1470072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal machine learning approach for the differentiation of NTM from MTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data and CT images of 175 patients were retrospectively obtained. We established clinical data-based model, radiomics-based model, and multimodal (clinical plus radiomics) model gradually using 5 machine learning algorithms (Logistic, XGBoost, AdaBoost, RandomForest, and LightGBM). Optimal algorithm in each model was selected after evaluating the differentiation performance both in training and validation sets. The model performance was further verified using external new MTB and NTM patient data. Performance was also compared with the existing approaches and model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical data-based model contained age, gender, and IL-6, and the RandomForest algorithm achieved the optimal learning model. Two key radiomics features of CT images were identified and then used to establish the radiomics model, finding that model from Logistic algorithm was the optimal. The multimodal model contained age, IL-6, and the 2 radiomics features, and the optimal model was from LightGBM algorithm. The optimal multimodal model had the highest AUC value, accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value compared with the optimal clinical or radiomics models, and its' favorable performance was also verified in the external test dataset (accuracy = 0.745, sensitivity = 0.900). Additionally, the performance of multimodal model was better than that of the radiologist, NGS detection, and existing machine learning model, with an increased accuracy of 26, 4, and 6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to establish multimodal model to distinguish NTM from MTB and it performs well in differentiating them, which has the potential to aid clinical decision-making for experienced radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1470072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1470072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal machine learning approach for the differentiation of NTM from MTB.

Methods: The clinical data and CT images of 175 patients were retrospectively obtained. We established clinical data-based model, radiomics-based model, and multimodal (clinical plus radiomics) model gradually using 5 machine learning algorithms (Logistic, XGBoost, AdaBoost, RandomForest, and LightGBM). Optimal algorithm in each model was selected after evaluating the differentiation performance both in training and validation sets. The model performance was further verified using external new MTB and NTM patient data. Performance was also compared with the existing approaches and model.

Results: The clinical data-based model contained age, gender, and IL-6, and the RandomForest algorithm achieved the optimal learning model. Two key radiomics features of CT images were identified and then used to establish the radiomics model, finding that model from Logistic algorithm was the optimal. The multimodal model contained age, IL-6, and the 2 radiomics features, and the optimal model was from LightGBM algorithm. The optimal multimodal model had the highest AUC value, accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value compared with the optimal clinical or radiomics models, and its' favorable performance was also verified in the external test dataset (accuracy = 0.745, sensitivity = 0.900). Additionally, the performance of multimodal model was better than that of the radiologist, NGS detection, and existing machine learning model, with an increased accuracy of 26, 4, and 6%, respectively.

Conclusion: This is the first study to establish multimodal model to distinguish NTM from MTB and it performs well in differentiating them, which has the potential to aid clinical decision-making for experienced radiologists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多模态机器学习的非结核分枝杆菌与结核分枝杆菌鉴别模型。
目的:开发并评价多模态机器学习方法在NTM与MTB鉴别中的有效性。方法:回顾性分析175例患者的临床资料及CT影像。采用Logistic、XGBoost、AdaBoost、RandomForest、LightGBM等5种机器学习算法,逐步建立基于临床数据的模型、基于放射组学的模型和多模态(临床+放射组学)模型。通过对训练集和验证集的差分性能进行评估,选择各模型的最优算法。使用外部新MTB和NTM患者数据进一步验证了模型的性能。并与现有方法和模型进行了性能比较。结果:基于临床数据的模型包含年龄、性别和IL-6,随机森林算法实现了最优学习模型。识别出CT图像的两个关键放射组学特征,并将其用于建立放射组学模型,发现Logistic算法模型是最优模型。多模态模型包含年龄、IL-6和2个放射组学特征,最优模型采用LightGBM算法。与最佳临床模型或放射组学模型相比,最佳多模态模型具有最高的AUC值、准确性、灵敏度和阴性预测值,并在外部测试数据集中验证了其良好的性能(准确性 = 0.745,灵敏度 = 0.900)。此外,多模态模型的性能优于放射科医生、NGS检测和现有机器学习模型,准确率分别提高了26.4%和6%。结论:本研究首次建立了区分NTM和MTB的多模态模型,该模型在区分NTM和MTB方面表现良好,有可能为有经验的放射科医生的临床决策提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary rehabilitation for pulmonary hypertension in high-altitude areas: a mixed-methods study of medical staff's perspectives. Risk factors associated with COVID-19 infection among Chinese elite athletes during overseas training and competitions: a large-scale cross-sectional survey. The evolving role of nonprofit hospitals and health systems in improving community health. The usage divide of digital health technology in age-friendly home modifications: an ethnographic study among older adults in rural China. The impact of older adults' volunteer motivation on successful aging: a moderated mediation model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1