Training Future Physician-Scientists in Social Sciences and Humanities.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09452-3
David T Zhu
{"title":"Training Future Physician-Scientists in Social Sciences and Humanities.","authors":"David T Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09452-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MD/PhD programs have traditionally prioritized the biomedical sciences, training physician-scientists skilled at advancing medical knowledge. Yet, with health disparities increasingly traced to social determinants of health (SDOH), a broader approach-one that integrates \"non-traditional\" fields such as the social sciences and humanities (SSH)-is essential. Significant challenges persist at three levels: (1) at the structural and systemic levels, where funding mechanisms like the NIH's Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) prioritize biomedical fields, limiting support for SSH fields; (2) at the institutional level, where curricula and resources remain narrowly aligned with biomedical timelines, leaving SSH trainees without adequate support; and (3) at the individual level, where the demands of SSH research often clash with the broader structure of MD/PhD programs, creating unique hurdles. Addressing these barriers requires coordinated reforms, including expanding MSTP programs' eligibility to include SSH fields and partnering with funding agencies and foundations to establish dedicated SSH funding. Medical schools could further support these students by developing cross-departmental SSH-integrated tracks with dedicated mentorship from SSH departments. Additionally, SSH-specific mentorship and community-building initiatives could reduce isolation and nurture a shared identity among SSH trainees. Bridging these gaps is paramount to making MD/PhD training for SSH students more inclusive and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2408-2412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09452-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MD/PhD programs have traditionally prioritized the biomedical sciences, training physician-scientists skilled at advancing medical knowledge. Yet, with health disparities increasingly traced to social determinants of health (SDOH), a broader approach-one that integrates "non-traditional" fields such as the social sciences and humanities (SSH)-is essential. Significant challenges persist at three levels: (1) at the structural and systemic levels, where funding mechanisms like the NIH's Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) prioritize biomedical fields, limiting support for SSH fields; (2) at the institutional level, where curricula and resources remain narrowly aligned with biomedical timelines, leaving SSH trainees without adequate support; and (3) at the individual level, where the demands of SSH research often clash with the broader structure of MD/PhD programs, creating unique hurdles. Addressing these barriers requires coordinated reforms, including expanding MSTP programs' eligibility to include SSH fields and partnering with funding agencies and foundations to establish dedicated SSH funding. Medical schools could further support these students by developing cross-departmental SSH-integrated tracks with dedicated mentorship from SSH departments. Additionally, SSH-specific mentorship and community-building initiatives could reduce isolation and nurture a shared identity among SSH trainees. Bridging these gaps is paramount to making MD/PhD training for SSH students more inclusive and effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养未来的社会科学和人文科学的医师科学家。
医学博士/博士课程传统上优先考虑生物医学科学,培养擅长推进医学知识的内科科学家。然而,随着健康差异越来越多地追溯到健康的社会决定因素(SDOH),一种更广泛的方法——一种整合诸如社会科学和人文科学(SSH)等“非传统”领域的方法——是必不可少的。重大挑战存在于三个层面:(1)在结构和系统层面,NIH的医学科学家培训计划(MSTP)等资助机制优先考虑生物医学领域,限制了对SSH领域的支持;(2)在机构层面,课程和资源仍然与生物医学时间表紧密结合,使SSH学员得不到足够的支持;(3)在个人层面,SSH研究的需求经常与MD/PhD项目的整体结构相冲突,造成了独特的障碍。解决这些障碍需要协调改革,包括扩大MSTP项目的资格,使其包括SSH领域,并与资助机构和基金会合作,建立专门的SSH资助。医学院可以进一步支持这些学生,开发跨院系的SSH综合课程,由SSH院系专门指导。此外,针对SSH的指导和社区建设举措可以减少SSH学员之间的孤立和培养共同的身份认同。弥合这些差距对于使SSH学生的博士/博士培训更具包容性和有效性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Building Community Health Center Teams: Evaluating the Impact of Team Training. Risk of New Headaches Following GLP-1RA Initiation in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation. Trends and Disparities in Clinician Diagnosis of Overweight and Obesity. Underrepresentation of Filipino, Laotian, Cambodian, and Indonesians Among US Allopathic Medical Students. Characteristics of Restraint Use on Inpatient Medical/Surgical and Psychiatric Units at a Tertiary Care County Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1