Maternal Depressive Symptomology and Small-for-Gestational-Age: Do Coping Efforts Moderate the Relationship?

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s40615-025-02338-4
Habibat A Oguntade, Rhonda K Dailey, Dawn P Misra, Jaime C Slaughter-Acey
{"title":"Maternal Depressive Symptomology and Small-for-Gestational-Age: Do Coping Efforts Moderate the Relationship?","authors":"Habibat A Oguntade, Rhonda K Dailey, Dawn P Misra, Jaime C Slaughter-Acey","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02338-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence regarding the impact of prenatal depression and other psychosocial factors, such as coping, on perinatal outcomes is limited. We examined whether depressive symptoms during pregnancy were associated with the rate of having a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant and whether women's coping styles modified the relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a cohort of 1410 Black/African American women in Metropolitan Detroit, MI, using a structured maternal interview and medical record abstraction. Depressive symptomology was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Women's coping efforts (confronting, distancing, and internalizing) were assessed using the Ways of Coping (WOC) questionnaire. Modified-Poisson regression models assessed direct and moderated associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 20% of women had severe depressive symptoms (CES-D > 23). Severe depressive symptoms were associated with having an SGA infant (adjusted PR [aPR] = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02-1.89). Among women who frequently utilized confrontive coping efforts, severe depressive symptoms were marginally associated with SGA (PR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.98-2.09), but not among women using confrontive coping less frequently. Regarding distance coping, severe depressive symptoms were not associated with SGA among women who frequently used distancing. However, severe depressive symptoms were associated with SGA (PR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.03-2.24) among women who use distancing coping less frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>/Implications. Our findings suggest the use of confrontive and distancing coping moderates the relationship between depressive symptoms and SGA. In addition to screening for depressive symptomology during pregnancy, clinicians may want to assess coping styles as they drive women's response to stress and may be amenable to intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02338-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence regarding the impact of prenatal depression and other psychosocial factors, such as coping, on perinatal outcomes is limited. We examined whether depressive symptoms during pregnancy were associated with the rate of having a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant and whether women's coping styles modified the relationship.

Methods: Data were obtained from a cohort of 1410 Black/African American women in Metropolitan Detroit, MI, using a structured maternal interview and medical record abstraction. Depressive symptomology was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Women's coping efforts (confronting, distancing, and internalizing) were assessed using the Ways of Coping (WOC) questionnaire. Modified-Poisson regression models assessed direct and moderated associations.

Results: About 20% of women had severe depressive symptoms (CES-D > 23). Severe depressive symptoms were associated with having an SGA infant (adjusted PR [aPR] = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02-1.89). Among women who frequently utilized confrontive coping efforts, severe depressive symptoms were marginally associated with SGA (PR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.98-2.09), but not among women using confrontive coping less frequently. Regarding distance coping, severe depressive symptoms were not associated with SGA among women who frequently used distancing. However, severe depressive symptoms were associated with SGA (PR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.03-2.24) among women who use distancing coping less frequently.

Conclusions: /Implications. Our findings suggest the use of confrontive and distancing coping moderates the relationship between depressive symptoms and SGA. In addition to screening for depressive symptomology during pregnancy, clinicians may want to assess coping styles as they drive women's response to stress and may be amenable to intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介有关产前抑郁和其他社会心理因素(如应对方式)对围产期结局影响的证据非常有限。我们研究了孕期抑郁症状是否与妊高症(SGA)婴儿的出生率有关,以及妇女的应对方式是否会改变这种关系:数据来自密歇根州底特律大都会区的 1410 名黑人/非洲裔美国妇女,采用的是结构化产妇访谈和病历摘要。抑郁症状采用流行病学研究中心抑郁(CES-D)量表进行测量。使用 "应对方式"(WOC)问卷对妇女的应对方式(面对、疏远和内化)进行了评估。修正的泊松回归模型评估了直接关联和调节关联:约 20% 的女性有严重的抑郁症状(CES-D > 23)。严重抑郁症状与 SGA 婴儿的出生有关(调整后 PR [aPR] = 1.39,95% CI = 1.02-1.89)。在经常使用对抗性应对方法的妇女中,严重抑郁症状与 SGA 稍有关联(PR = 1.43,95% CI = 0.98-2.09),但在较少使用对抗性应对方法的妇女中则没有关联。关于距离应对,在经常使用距离应对的妇女中,严重抑郁症状与 SGA 无关。然而,在较少使用距离应对法的女性中,严重抑郁症状与 SGA 相关(PR = 1.52,95% CI = 1.03-2.24):/意义。我们的研究结果表明,采用对抗性和疏远性应对方式可调节抑郁症状与 SGA 之间的关系。除了对孕期抑郁症状进行筛查外,临床医生可能还需要对应对方式进行评估,因为它们会影响妇女对压力的反应,并有可能进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
"She's Always Made Sure That We Had Black Doctors, Particularly Women Doctors If We Could… and How It Can Sometimes Be the Difference Between Life and Death." Black College Women's Reflections On Medical Racism As a Social Determinant of Health. Heart Failure in Black Populations: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Disparities. Racial Disparity in Healthcare Experience Among Women Seeking Fertility Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sex Differences in Cigarette Smoking Among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black All of Us Participants: The Relative Importance of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health. Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors Affecting Age at First Birth Among Tribal Women in India: An NFHS-5 Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1