Michelle E Carrière, Lidwine B Mokkink, Jonathon Pleat, Zephanie Tyack, Anouk Pijpe, Henrica C W de Vet, Paul P M van Zuijlen
{"title":"Development of the Observer Scales of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: An International Delphi Study.","authors":"Michelle E Carrière, Lidwine B Mokkink, Jonathon Pleat, Zephanie Tyack, Anouk Pijpe, Henrica C W de Vet, Paul P M van Zuijlen","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This Delphi study aimed to develop the Observer Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0 for measurements of scar quality in patients with all types of scars. The POSAS 3.0 Patient Scale has been developed using an extensive qualitative study, which has been published separately.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online, 3-round Delphi study was performed with 124 international scar experts from 23 countries spanning 7 continents. Panelists rated their (dis)agreement with proposals regarding the wording and relevance of scar characteristics on a 5-point scale (\"strongly disagree\" to \"strongly agree\"), and provided arguments for their decisions. Consensus was reached if ≥67% of the panelists agreed or strongly agreed to a proposal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on the inclusion of 9 items. Two versions of the Observer Scale of the POSAS 3.0 have been developed, 1 generic version including 7 items, and 1 linear scar version, containing the same 7 items and 2 additional scar-specific items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study using the Delphi process to develop an instrument for the assessment of scars. Panelists from all over the world reached a consensus on the content of 2 versions of the Observer Scale, the generic version and the linear scar version. By involving the potential end-user community of the new POSAS version in its development, we expect the developed instrument to have high content validity. For a comprehensive scar assessment, the Observer Scale should be used in combination with the Patient Scales of the POSAS 3.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This Delphi study aimed to develop the Observer Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0 for measurements of scar quality in patients with all types of scars. The POSAS 3.0 Patient Scale has been developed using an extensive qualitative study, which has been published separately.
Methods: An online, 3-round Delphi study was performed with 124 international scar experts from 23 countries spanning 7 continents. Panelists rated their (dis)agreement with proposals regarding the wording and relevance of scar characteristics on a 5-point scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"), and provided arguments for their decisions. Consensus was reached if ≥67% of the panelists agreed or strongly agreed to a proposal.
Results: Consensus was reached on the inclusion of 9 items. Two versions of the Observer Scale of the POSAS 3.0 have been developed, 1 generic version including 7 items, and 1 linear scar version, containing the same 7 items and 2 additional scar-specific items.
Conclusions: This is the first study using the Delphi process to develop an instrument for the assessment of scars. Panelists from all over the world reached a consensus on the content of 2 versions of the Observer Scale, the generic version and the linear scar version. By involving the potential end-user community of the new POSAS version in its development, we expect the developed instrument to have high content validity. For a comprehensive scar assessment, the Observer Scale should be used in combination with the Patient Scales of the POSAS 3.0.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.