How Effective Are the Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Vaccines Currently Being Tested in Dogs? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Parasite Immunology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1111/pim.70006
Josiane Aparecida Martiniano de Pádua, Tuane Ferreira Melo, Rafaella Silva Andrade, Marina Martins de Oliveira, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Andressa Mariana Saldanha-Elias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles, Ana Paula Peconick, Kelly Moura Keller
{"title":"How Effective Are the Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Vaccines Currently Being Tested in Dogs? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Josiane Aparecida Martiniano de Pádua, Tuane Ferreira Melo, Rafaella Silva Andrade, Marina Martins de Oliveira, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Andressa Mariana Saldanha-Elias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles, Ana Paula Peconick, Kelly Moura Keller","doi":"10.1111/pim.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonotic disease of great worldwide importance and can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative dogs. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the efficacy rate of vaccines tested in dogs against CVL or L. infantum infection. We used PRISMA guidelines for this review and Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo and CABI to find studies about vaccines against CVL in dogs. Articles were analysed and grouped according to the antigens used. The risk of bias analysis was performed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and meta-analysis using R Statistical language. The final analysis was conducted using 22 studies that assessed DNA, excreted/secreted proteins and subunit vaccines, involving a total of 92 animals, 96 animals and 78 animals, respectively. Regarding DNA vaccines, the analyses revealed non-significant results in terms of preventing parasite presence in the organs or the onset of clinical signs. However, subunit vaccines demonstrated statistically significant results concerning parasite presence in the organs, but not when it comes to clinical signs. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference observed in parasite burden in the organs or clinical signs for the excreted/secreted vaccines. The meta-analysis indicated that subunit and excreted/secreted protein vaccines were significantly more effective in preventing parasites in vaccinated animals compared to both DNA-based vaccines and control groups. Heterogeneity among studies is a limitation, emphasising the need for standardised protocols for reliable comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19931,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Immunology","volume":"47 3","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonotic disease of great worldwide importance and can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative dogs. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the efficacy rate of vaccines tested in dogs against CVL or L. infantum infection. We used PRISMA guidelines for this review and Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo and CABI to find studies about vaccines against CVL in dogs. Articles were analysed and grouped according to the antigens used. The risk of bias analysis was performed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and meta-analysis using R Statistical language. The final analysis was conducted using 22 studies that assessed DNA, excreted/secreted proteins and subunit vaccines, involving a total of 92 animals, 96 animals and 78 animals, respectively. Regarding DNA vaccines, the analyses revealed non-significant results in terms of preventing parasite presence in the organs or the onset of clinical signs. However, subunit vaccines demonstrated statistically significant results concerning parasite presence in the organs, but not when it comes to clinical signs. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference observed in parasite burden in the organs or clinical signs for the excreted/secreted vaccines. The meta-analysis indicated that subunit and excreted/secreted protein vaccines were significantly more effective in preventing parasites in vaccinated animals compared to both DNA-based vaccines and control groups. Heterogeneity among studies is a limitation, emphasising the need for standardised protocols for reliable comparisons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parasite Immunology
Parasite Immunology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Immunology is an international journal devoted to research on all aspects of parasite immunology in human and animal hosts. Emphasis has been placed on how hosts control parasites, and the immunopathological reactions which take place in the course of parasitic infections. The Journal welcomes original work on all parasites, particularly human parasitology, helminths, protozoa and ectoparasites.
期刊最新文献
How Effective Are the Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Vaccines Currently Being Tested in Dogs? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Serosurvey of Toxocariasis and Its Association With Allergic Asthma in Children: A Case-Control Study in Southwest Iran. Toxoplasma gondii (GRA10): A Closer Glance Into Immunogenic and Biochemical Characteristics Using In Silico Approach. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Encapsulated With Paromomycin: An Effective Oral Formulation Against Leishmania major in Mouse Model. Macrophage Polarisation During Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis Infection in Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1