Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for avoiding errors in robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS).

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1007/s43390-025-01060-9
Michael G Vitale, Ritt R Givens, Matan S Malka, Kevin Lu, Thomas M Zervos, Joseph Lombardi, Zeeshan Sardar, Ronald Lehman, Lawrence Lenke, Rajiv Sethi, Stephen Lewis, Daniel Hedequist, Themistocles Protopsaltis, A Noelle Larson, Sheeraz Qureshi, Brandon Carlson, Terrence T Kim, David Skaggs
{"title":"Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for avoiding errors in robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS).","authors":"Michael G Vitale, Ritt R Givens, Matan S Malka, Kevin Lu, Thomas M Zervos, Joseph Lombardi, Zeeshan Sardar, Ronald Lehman, Lawrence Lenke, Rajiv Sethi, Stephen Lewis, Daniel Hedequist, Themistocles Protopsaltis, A Noelle Larson, Sheeraz Qureshi, Brandon Carlson, Terrence T Kim, David Skaggs","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01060-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the rapid increase in the use of robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS), reports describing complications have inevitably emerged. This study builds on previous work done to identify, characterize, and classify potential sources of error in spine surgery performed with enabling technology in the operating room. The goal of this study is to leverage expert opinion to develop a set of best practice guidelines that can be employed to minimize complications and optimize patient safety, specifically as it relates to RASS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After assembling a group of attending spine surgeons experienced in the use of RASS across the country, formal consensus regarding the best practices was developed using the Delphi method and nominal group technique. After a review of the relevant literature and evidence, an initial survey of study group members (n=12) helped frame potential areas for investigation. Statements were subsequently edited, removed, or elaborated upon during four iterative rounds of live discussion with the opportunity for panelists to propose new guidelines at any point in the process. Respondents were able to suggest modifications and refine the statements until consensus, defined as ≥ 80% agreement, was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a three-round iterative survey and video conference Delphi process, followed by an in-person meeting at the Summit for Safety in Spine Surgery, consensus was achieved on 27 best practice guideline statements. This BPG had the key focus areas of 1) general protocols, 2) screw planning/execution, 3) optimization of surgical technique, and 4) areas for robotic improvement. (available at https://safetyinspinesurgery.com/ ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides expert insight into the best practices for minimizing errors in RASS with the presentation of 27 recommendations that can serve to reduce practice variability, optimize safety, and guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01060-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the rapid increase in the use of robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS), reports describing complications have inevitably emerged. This study builds on previous work done to identify, characterize, and classify potential sources of error in spine surgery performed with enabling technology in the operating room. The goal of this study is to leverage expert opinion to develop a set of best practice guidelines that can be employed to minimize complications and optimize patient safety, specifically as it relates to RASS.

Methods: After assembling a group of attending spine surgeons experienced in the use of RASS across the country, formal consensus regarding the best practices was developed using the Delphi method and nominal group technique. After a review of the relevant literature and evidence, an initial survey of study group members (n=12) helped frame potential areas for investigation. Statements were subsequently edited, removed, or elaborated upon during four iterative rounds of live discussion with the opportunity for panelists to propose new guidelines at any point in the process. Respondents were able to suggest modifications and refine the statements until consensus, defined as ≥ 80% agreement, was achieved.

Results: After a three-round iterative survey and video conference Delphi process, followed by an in-person meeting at the Summit for Safety in Spine Surgery, consensus was achieved on 27 best practice guideline statements. This BPG had the key focus areas of 1) general protocols, 2) screw planning/execution, 3) optimization of surgical technique, and 4) areas for robotic improvement. (available at https://safetyinspinesurgery.com/ ).

Conclusion: This work provides expert insight into the best practices for minimizing errors in RASS with the presentation of 27 recommendations that can serve to reduce practice variability, optimize safety, and guide future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立共识:制定机器人辅助脊柱手术(RASS)中避免错误的最佳实践指南(BPG)。
随着机器人辅助脊柱手术(RASS)应用的迅速增加,描述并发症的报道不可避免地出现了。本研究建立在先前工作的基础上,以识别、表征和分类在手术室中使用使能技术进行脊柱手术的潜在错误来源。本研究的目的是利用专家意见制定一套最佳实践指南,可用于减少并发症和优化患者安全,特别是与RASS相关。方法:在召集了一组在全国范围内使用RASS经验丰富的主治脊柱外科医生后,使用德尔菲法和名义小组技术就最佳实践达成了正式共识。在回顾了相关文献和证据后,对研究小组成员(n=12)进行了初步调查,帮助确定了潜在的调查领域。声明随后被编辑、删除,或者在四个迭代的现场讨论中被详细阐述,小组成员有机会在过程中的任何时候提出新的指导方针。受访者能够提出修改和完善陈述的建议,直到达成共识,定义为≥80%的一致性。结果:经过三轮迭代调查和视频会议德尔福过程,随后在脊柱外科安全峰会上进行了面对面的会议,就27个最佳实践指南声明达成了共识。该BPG的重点是1)一般方案,2)螺钉计划/执行,3)手术技术优化,4)机器人改进领域。(网址:https://safetyinspinesurgery.com/)。结论:这项工作为最小化RASS错误的最佳实践提供了专家见解,提出了27条建议,可以减少实践的可变性,优化安全性,并指导未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes after surgical correction of severe scoliosis in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: a prospective, 2-year minimum follow-up study with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. Distal hyperlordotic distribution does not increase the risk of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing long-construct fusion to the pelvis with optimal global sagittal alignment. Comment on "Artificial intelligence-driven 3D surface-topography app for screening and monitoring adolescent scoliosis: early results from a single institution". Comment on "Artificial intelligence automated measurements of spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity a systematic review". It is all about perspectives-poor agreement between the patient, their parent and their physician in perception of spinal appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1