Impact of Interval to Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Thoracic Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.70019
Hui Xu, Zhinuan Hong, Ye Lin, Sunkui Ke, Zhen Chen, Shuhan Xie, Dinghang Chen, Kaiming Peng, Peipei Zhang, Mingduan Chen, Ziyang Han, Jihong Lin, Shuchen Chen, Jinxin Xu, Jinbiao Xie, Mingqiang Kang
{"title":"Impact of Interval to Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Hui Xu, Zhinuan Hong, Ye Lin, Sunkui Ke, Zhen Chen, Shuhan Xie, Dinghang Chen, Kaiming Peng, Peipei Zhang, Mingduan Chen, Ziyang Han, Jihong Lin, Shuchen Chen, Jinxin Xu, Jinbiao Xie, Mingqiang Kang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) has emerged as a novel and promising treatment model for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal interval to esophagectomy after nICT remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the impact of a prolonged interval (7-10 weeks) on short- and long-term outcomes compared to the standard interval (4-6 weeks).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis, including three centers. Patients were diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC (cT3-4a or cN+) and received radical resection after at least one cycle of nICT. The primary outcomes were pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy patients were included in the study, with 123 in the standard interval group and 47 in the prolonged interval group. After IPTW, the prolonged interval group exhibited a higher pathological complete response (pCR) than the standard group, but the difference was not statistically significant (29.5% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.306). Additionally, although the 3-year DFS and OS rates were higher in the prolonged interval group, these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no statistically significant variances observed in terms of intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, postoperative hospital stays, duration of thoracic drainage tube placement, hospital expenses, or postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients demonstrated tolerance for esophagectomy within 4-6 weeks after nICT. Based on the present findings regarding pCR, DFS, and OS, extending the time to surgery beyond 6 weeks was found to be acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 5","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) has emerged as a novel and promising treatment model for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal interval to esophagectomy after nICT remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the impact of a prolonged interval (7-10 weeks) on short- and long-term outcomes compared to the standard interval (4-6 weeks).

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis, including three centers. Patients were diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC (cT3-4a or cN+) and received radical resection after at least one cycle of nICT. The primary outcomes were pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics.

Results: One hundred and seventy patients were included in the study, with 123 in the standard interval group and 47 in the prolonged interval group. After IPTW, the prolonged interval group exhibited a higher pathological complete response (pCR) than the standard group, but the difference was not statistically significant (29.5% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.306). Additionally, although the 3-year DFS and OS rates were higher in the prolonged interval group, these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no statistically significant variances observed in terms of intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, postoperative hospital stays, duration of thoracic drainage tube placement, hospital expenses, or postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Patients demonstrated tolerance for esophagectomy within 4-6 weeks after nICT. Based on the present findings regarding pCR, DFS, and OS, extending the time to surgery beyond 6 weeks was found to be acceptable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助免疫化疗后食管切除术间隔的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列分析。
背景:新辅助化疗免疫治疗(nICT)已成为一种新的和有前途的治疗模式食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)。然而,nICT术后食管切除术的最佳时间间隔仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨与标准间隔(4-6周)相比,延长间隔(7-10周)对短期和长期结果的影响。方法:这是一项多中心回顾性队列分析,包括三个中心。患者被诊断为局部晚期ESCC (cT3-4a或cN+),并在至少一个nICT周期后接受根治性切除术。主要结局是病理反应、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。利用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来平衡基线特征。结果:170例患者纳入研究,其中123例为标准间歇期组,47例为延长间歇期组。IPTW后,延长间期组病理完全缓解(pCR)高于标准组,但差异无统计学意义(29.5%比41.5%,p = 0.306)。此外,虽然延长间隔组的3年DFS和OS率较高,但这些差异没有达到统计学意义。术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间、胸腔引流管放置时间、住院费用、术后并发症等方面均无统计学差异。结论:患者在nICT术后4-6周内表现出对食管切除术的耐受性。根据目前关于pCR、DFS和OS的研究结果,将手术时间延长至6周以上是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
期刊最新文献
Pleural-Based GLI1-Altered Mesenchymal Tumor With ACTB-GLI1 Fusion: A Rare Pulmonary Entity Mimicking Synovial Sarcoma. Synergistic Antitumor Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With TROP2-CAR-T Cells in a Xenograft Mouse Model of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Delayed Tumor Shrinkage Beyond Progressive Disease in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immunochemotherapy: A Case Report. Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Mutation Testing Trends, Prevalence, and Outcomes in Metastatic, Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Non-SQ NSCLC) Patients in Queensland, Australia From 2014-2023. Addition of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor to Platinum Retreatment for Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Perioperative Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1