Presentation and outcomes of surgery for choledochal cyst in children and adults: an experience of 329 cases.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02138-9
Sukanta Ray, Hemabha Saha, Swapnil Sen, Suman Das, Somdatta Lahiri, Somak Das, Tuhin Subhra Mandal, Jayanta Biswas, Sujan Khamrui
{"title":"Presentation and outcomes of surgery for choledochal cyst in children and adults: an experience of 329 cases.","authors":"Sukanta Ray, Hemabha Saha, Swapnil Sen, Suman Das, Somdatta Lahiri, Somak Das, Tuhin Subhra Mandal, Jayanta Biswas, Sujan Khamrui","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02138-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to report our experience in patients with choledochal cyst (CDC) and to evaluate whether there is any difference in the clinical presentation, cyst -related complications, and long-term biliary outcomes after surgery among children and adults. All the patients who underwent CDC excision between January 2008 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: children (< 18 years) and adults (≥ 18 years). There were 329 patients with CDC excision (77.5% were female, adult/children = 251/78). Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom in both groups. Abdominal lump (10.3% vs 3.2%; p = 0.011) and the triad of CDC (9% vs 2.4%; p = 0.009) were more common in children. But, the preoperative biliary intervention (37.8% vs 15.4%; p =  < 0.001), previous biliary surgery (32.7% vs 3.8%; p =  < 0.001), and prevalence of gallstones (36.7% vs 3.8%; p =  < 0.001), cystolithiasis (56.6% vs 38.5%; p = 0.005), and intrahepatic stones (7.6% vs 1.3%; p = 0.054) were more common in adults. Most patients were presented with type I CDC (71.4%). Extrahepatic bile duct excision with Roux en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in all the patients. Although overall postoperative complications were comparable between adults and children (31.1% vs 26.9%; p = 0.485), wound infection was more common in adults (19.9% vs 6.4%; p = 0.005) and bile leak was more common in children (12.8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.021). There was no operative mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 59 (40) months, 2 patients (0.78%) developed malignancy. Excellent or good Long-term biliary outcome was significantly better in children than adults (98.1% vs 90.5%; p = 0.010). Independent predictors for unsatisfactory biliary outcomes were type IVA cysts, postoperative bile leak, adult patients, and longer duration of follow-up. In conclusion, presentation and cyst-related complications differ between adults and children. Surgery offers excellent results in the vast majority of patients. Long-term biliary complications were more in adults. Long-term follow-up is recommended for the possibility of future development of hepato-biliary-pancreatic malignancy and delayed biliary complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"459-470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02138-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report our experience in patients with choledochal cyst (CDC) and to evaluate whether there is any difference in the clinical presentation, cyst -related complications, and long-term biliary outcomes after surgery among children and adults. All the patients who underwent CDC excision between January 2008 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: children (< 18 years) and adults (≥ 18 years). There were 329 patients with CDC excision (77.5% were female, adult/children = 251/78). Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom in both groups. Abdominal lump (10.3% vs 3.2%; p = 0.011) and the triad of CDC (9% vs 2.4%; p = 0.009) were more common in children. But, the preoperative biliary intervention (37.8% vs 15.4%; p =  < 0.001), previous biliary surgery (32.7% vs 3.8%; p =  < 0.001), and prevalence of gallstones (36.7% vs 3.8%; p =  < 0.001), cystolithiasis (56.6% vs 38.5%; p = 0.005), and intrahepatic stones (7.6% vs 1.3%; p = 0.054) were more common in adults. Most patients were presented with type I CDC (71.4%). Extrahepatic bile duct excision with Roux en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in all the patients. Although overall postoperative complications were comparable between adults and children (31.1% vs 26.9%; p = 0.485), wound infection was more common in adults (19.9% vs 6.4%; p = 0.005) and bile leak was more common in children (12.8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.021). There was no operative mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 59 (40) months, 2 patients (0.78%) developed malignancy. Excellent or good Long-term biliary outcome was significantly better in children than adults (98.1% vs 90.5%; p = 0.010). Independent predictors for unsatisfactory biliary outcomes were type IVA cysts, postoperative bile leak, adult patients, and longer duration of follow-up. In conclusion, presentation and cyst-related complications differ between adults and children. Surgery offers excellent results in the vast majority of patients. Long-term biliary complications were more in adults. Long-term follow-up is recommended for the possibility of future development of hepato-biliary-pancreatic malignancy and delayed biliary complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
329例儿童和成人胆总管囊肿的临床表现和手术结果分析。
本研究的目的是报告我们治疗胆总管囊肿(CDC)患者的经验,并评估儿童和成人手术后在临床表现、囊肿相关并发症和长期胆道预后方面是否存在差异。回顾性分析2008年1月至2023年12月期间所有接受CDC切除术的患者。患者分为两组:儿童组(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Risk of malignancy and necessity of completion thyroidectomy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), more than expected in endemic region. Comment on 'Outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure in a retrospective cohort of patients'. Multimodal AI approach combining deep learning imaging and clinical machine learning for pancreatic cancer detection. Management of inguinal and femoral hernias in women: meta analysis of current practices and review of international guidelines. Heterogeneity in the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current surgeons' perspective and lessons for the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1