Addressing spirituality-related moral challenges in palliative care: perspectives of spiritual counselors.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/08854726.2025.2471740
Shanti Bolt, Suzanne Metselaar, Tonke Versteeg, Charlotte Kröger
{"title":"Addressing spirituality-related moral challenges in palliative care: perspectives of spiritual counselors.","authors":"Shanti Bolt, Suzanne Metselaar, Tonke Versteeg, Charlotte Kröger","doi":"10.1080/08854726.2025.2471740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spiritual beliefs are increasingly important toward the end-of-life as they shape perspectives on good care, life, and death. However, in pluralistic societies, the spiritual beliefs of patients and care providers may differ. Care providers can find it difficult to be responsive to spiritual diversity and to how different belief systems of patients and their families may influence perspectives on care and dying. This can lead to moral challenges. Dialogical clinical ethics support (CES) helps care providers to jointly reflect on and deal with moral challenges. However, while spirituality shapes perspectives on good care, it is rarely addressed explicitly in CES sessions. We interviewed ten spiritual counselors of different denominations in The Netherlands to explore spirituality-related moral challenges in the delivery of palliative care, and to gain insight into their perspectives on what is needed to make both dialogues with patients and family and dialogical CES more responsive to spiritual diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","volume":" ","pages":"292-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2025.2471740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spiritual beliefs are increasingly important toward the end-of-life as they shape perspectives on good care, life, and death. However, in pluralistic societies, the spiritual beliefs of patients and care providers may differ. Care providers can find it difficult to be responsive to spiritual diversity and to how different belief systems of patients and their families may influence perspectives on care and dying. This can lead to moral challenges. Dialogical clinical ethics support (CES) helps care providers to jointly reflect on and deal with moral challenges. However, while spirituality shapes perspectives on good care, it is rarely addressed explicitly in CES sessions. We interviewed ten spiritual counselors of different denominations in The Netherlands to explore spirituality-related moral challenges in the delivery of palliative care, and to gain insight into their perspectives on what is needed to make both dialogues with patients and family and dialogical CES more responsive to spiritual diversity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决精神相关的道德挑战在姑息治疗:精神辅导员的观点。
精神信仰对生命终结越来越重要,因为它们塑造了人们对良好护理、生命和死亡的看法。然而,在多元社会中,患者和护理人员的精神信仰可能有所不同。护理提供者可能会发现很难对精神多样性做出反应,以及患者及其家属的不同信仰体系如何影响对护理和死亡的看法。这可能导致道德上的挑战。对话式临床伦理支持(CES)帮助医护人员共同反思和应对道德挑战。然而,虽然灵性塑造了人们对良好护理的看法,但它很少在CES会议上得到明确解决。我们采访了10位来自荷兰不同教派的精神咨询师,探讨在姑息治疗中与精神相关的道德挑战,并深入了解他们的观点,即如何使与患者和家庭的对话以及对话CES更能响应精神多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles based on original research, quality assurance/improvement studies, descriptions of programs and interventions, program/intervention evaluations, and literature reviews on topics pertinent to pastoral/spiritual care, clinical pastoral education, chaplaincy, and spirituality in relation to physical and mental health.
期刊最新文献
The leadership of interfaith hospital chaplains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chaplains in transition: a net workforce analysis in a southeastern healthcare organization. An e-Delphi study on integrated curriculum standards for healthcare chaplaincy education. The impact of religious and spiritual care on parents or caregivers in pediatrics: a scoping review. Tea for the soul: a chaplain-led intervention impacting meaning & joy in healthcare workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1