Frailty as Predictor for Early Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.

Mladen Stankovic, Christian Weber, Martin Koser, Norbert Weidner
{"title":"Frailty as Predictor for Early Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Mladen Stankovic, Christian Weber, Martin Koser, Norbert Weidner","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-10-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While chronological aging does not necessarily impair oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy, the role of frailty remains less clear. This study aimed to evaluate whether frailty significantly affects early continence rates following radical prostatectomy and to explore the potential association between frailty and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 212 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy was conducted. Preoperative frailty assessment employed a multimodal evaluation encompassing cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and urinary systems, supplemented by conventional risk measures such as physical performance status and biochemical markers. The primary endpoint was early continence recovery, while secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, oncological outcomes, or complication rates between the open and robotic-assisted surgical cohorts. However, frailty was strongly associated with reduced early continence recovery, irrespective of surgical technique (p<0.001). No significant association was detected between frailty and 30-day postoperative complications (p=0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights frailty as a pivotal predictor of early continence outcomes. The lack of association between frailty and postoperative complications suggests that comprehensive frailty assessment may be more relevant for anticipating functional recovery than predicting immediate surgical risks. These findings support integrating frailty evaluation into preoperative decision-making frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"10 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-10-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: While chronological aging does not necessarily impair oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy, the role of frailty remains less clear. This study aimed to evaluate whether frailty significantly affects early continence rates following radical prostatectomy and to explore the potential association between frailty and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 212 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy was conducted. Preoperative frailty assessment employed a multimodal evaluation encompassing cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and urinary systems, supplemented by conventional risk measures such as physical performance status and biochemical markers. The primary endpoint was early continence recovery, while secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications.

Results: Comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, oncological outcomes, or complication rates between the open and robotic-assisted surgical cohorts. However, frailty was strongly associated with reduced early continence recovery, irrespective of surgical technique (p<0.001). No significant association was detected between frailty and 30-day postoperative complications (p=0.36).

Conclusions: This study highlights frailty as a pivotal predictor of early continence outcomes. The lack of association between frailty and postoperative complications suggests that comprehensive frailty assessment may be more relevant for anticipating functional recovery than predicting immediate surgical risks. These findings support integrating frailty evaluation into preoperative decision-making frameworks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱是根治性前列腺切除术后早期功能预后的预测因子。
目的:虽然按时间顺序衰老并不一定影响根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤预后,但虚弱在其中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估虚弱是否显著影响根治性前列腺切除术后早期失禁率,并探讨虚弱与术后并发症之间的潜在关联。方法:对接受根治性前列腺切除术的212例患者进行回顾性队列研究。术前虚弱评估采用多模式评估,包括心血管系统、呼吸系统、神经系统和泌尿系统,辅以常规的风险测量,如身体表现状态和生化指标。主要终点是早期失禁恢复,次要终点包括30天的术后并发症。结果:对比分析显示,开放手术组和机器人辅助手术组在基线特征、肿瘤预后或并发症发生率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,无论手术技术如何,虚弱与早期失禁恢复的减少密切相关(结论:本研究强调虚弱是早期失禁结果的关键预测因素。虚弱和术后并发症之间缺乏关联表明,全面的虚弱评估可能与预测功能恢复比预测即时手术风险更相关。这些发现支持将衰弱评估纳入术前决策框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing SARCopenia with ecHOgraphy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Validation Study (SARCHO). Assessment of Frailty Status and Its Association with Heart Rate Variability and Body Composition Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Development and Initial Validation of a Brief Multidimensional Falls Efficacy Scale. Effects of REAC Neuro Postural Optimization on Gait and Postural Symmetry in Older Adults. Examination of the Characteristics and Relevant Physical Factors Associated with Persistent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Exploratory Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1