Detection of retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with high myopia complicated with glaucoma by optical coherence tomography.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1177/09287329241296770
Xin Wang, Yinglang Zhang, Hongbo Hu, Ning Wei
{"title":"Detection of retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with high myopia complicated with glaucoma by optical coherence tomography.","authors":"Xin Wang, Yinglang Zhang, Hongbo Hu, Ning Wei","doi":"10.1177/09287329241296770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To detect the changes in the thickness of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in patients with High Myopia (HM) complicated with glaucoma through Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>80 patients (160 eyes) with HM complicated with glaucoma treated from March 2018 to March 2020 were enrolled as the experimental group, and 60 healthy volunteers (120 eyes) undergoing physical examination in the same period were selected as the control group. OCT measured their RNFL thicknesses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with that in the control group, the nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness in the experimental group was significantly decreased, while the temporal RNFL thickness was significantly increased in the experimental group (<i>P </i>< 0.05). According to the diopter, patients in the experimental group were assigned into group A (<i>n </i>= 25, 50 eyes, diopter range: ≥ -6.00 D and ≤ -8.00 D), group B (<i>n</i> = 30, 60 eyes, diopter range: > -8.00 D and ≤ -10.00 D) and group C (<i>n</i> = 25, 50 eyes, diopter range: > -10.00 D). The nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness in group A were significantly greater than those in groups B and C (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the absolute value of diopter was negatively correlated with the nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and positively correlated with the thickness of temporal RNFL (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with HM complicated with glaucoma, RNFL is thinner in all quadrants except for temporal RNFL.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"2425-2430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241296770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To detect the changes in the thickness of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in patients with High Myopia (HM) complicated with glaucoma through Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

Methods: 80 patients (160 eyes) with HM complicated with glaucoma treated from March 2018 to March 2020 were enrolled as the experimental group, and 60 healthy volunteers (120 eyes) undergoing physical examination in the same period were selected as the control group. OCT measured their RNFL thicknesses.

Results: Compared with that in the control group, the nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness in the experimental group was significantly decreased, while the temporal RNFL thickness was significantly increased in the experimental group (P < 0.05). According to the diopter, patients in the experimental group were assigned into group A (n = 25, 50 eyes, diopter range: ≥ -6.00 D and ≤ -8.00 D), group B (n = 30, 60 eyes, diopter range: > -8.00 D and ≤ -10.00 D) and group C (n = 25, 50 eyes, diopter range: > -10.00 D). The nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness in group A were significantly greater than those in groups B and C (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the absolute value of diopter was negatively correlated with the nasal, supratemporal, subnasal, supranasal, and infratemporal RNFL thickness and overall mean RNFL thickness (P < 0.05), and positively correlated with the thickness of temporal RNFL (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with HM complicated with glaucoma, RNFL is thinner in all quadrants except for temporal RNFL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光学相干断层扫描检测高度近视合并青光眼患者视网膜神经纤维层。
目的:通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测高度近视(HM)合并青光眼患者视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的变化。方法:选取2018年3月~ 2020年3月收治的HM合并青光眼患者80例(160只眼)作为实验组,同期体检的健康志愿者60例(120只眼)作为对照组。OCT测量其RNFL厚度。结果:与对照组相比,鼻,supratemporal,鼻下,supranasal,和颞颥骨下的RNFL厚度和整体指实验组RNFL厚度显著减少,而颞RNFL厚度显著增加在实验组(P n = 25、50眼睛,屈光度范围:≥-6.00 D和≤-8.00 D), B组(n = 30 60眼睛,屈光度范围:> -8.00 D和≤-10.00 D)和C组(n = 25、50眼睛,屈光度范围:> -10.00 D)。鼻,A组颞上、鼻下、鼻上、颞下RNFL厚度及总体平均RNFL厚度均显著大于B、C组(P P P P)。结论:HM合并青光眼患者除颞部RNFL外,其余各象限RNFL均较薄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
期刊最新文献
Effect of transit time flow meter spike waveform on graft patency and its hemodynamic characteristics in coronary artery bypass grafting. The acute effects of single aerobic exercise on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in throwing athletes and untrained individuals: Focusing on throwing athletes. Thymoquinone regulates osteosarcoma cell proliferation through the P53 signaling pathway: A network pharmacology and molecular docking based health technology study. Estimating ground reaction forces and moments during gait from multiple kinematic variables using a feedforward neural network. Special issue: Progress in medical and health technologies for diagnosis, intervention, and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1