The Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Cerebellum Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s12311-025-01799-x
Maureen P Daly, Janet C Sherman, Jeremy D Schmahmann
{"title":"The Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale.","authors":"Maureen P Daly, Janet C Sherman, Jeremy D Schmahmann","doi":"10.1007/s12311-025-01799-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triad of cerebellar ataxiology is the cerebellar motor, vestibular, and cerebellar cognitive affective / Schmahmann syndrome (CCAS). The CCAS affective component comprises 5 domains: Attentional control, Emotional control, Autism spectrum, Psychosis spectrum, and Social Skill Set, each with hypermetric / overshoot and hypometric / undershoot poles reflecting the dysmetria of thought and universal cerebellar transform theories. There is no validated screening instrument to assess neuropsychiatric impairments in patients with cerebellar disorders. To examine the psychometric properties of our Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale (CNRS) that explores these symptoms and behaviors in patients with cerebellar disorders, 21 adults with ataxia completed the CNRS and other validation measures: the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version Informant Report, Adult Behavior Checklist, Older Adult Behavior Checklist, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. We examined CNRS internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, assessed item to subscale correlations, studied ceiling and floor effects, and convergent construct validity between CNRS and validity measure subscales. Internal consistency was α > 0.70 for each of the five domains. Subscale structure was generally confirmed: 86% of correlations between CNRS and validity subscales were significant. There were no ceiling effects. Item to subscale correlations indicated adequate reliability for total scale and subdomains. NPI-Q and CNRS scores were correlated, and 86.4% (19/22) of conceptually related subscales were significant. The CNRS is a reliable and valid measure of cerebellar neuropsychiatry. Further development can refine the instrument and shed light on the patient experience of their affective dysregulation and its clinical meaningfulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":"24 2","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01799-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The triad of cerebellar ataxiology is the cerebellar motor, vestibular, and cerebellar cognitive affective / Schmahmann syndrome (CCAS). The CCAS affective component comprises 5 domains: Attentional control, Emotional control, Autism spectrum, Psychosis spectrum, and Social Skill Set, each with hypermetric / overshoot and hypometric / undershoot poles reflecting the dysmetria of thought and universal cerebellar transform theories. There is no validated screening instrument to assess neuropsychiatric impairments in patients with cerebellar disorders. To examine the psychometric properties of our Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale (CNRS) that explores these symptoms and behaviors in patients with cerebellar disorders, 21 adults with ataxia completed the CNRS and other validation measures: the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version Informant Report, Adult Behavior Checklist, Older Adult Behavior Checklist, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. We examined CNRS internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, assessed item to subscale correlations, studied ceiling and floor effects, and convergent construct validity between CNRS and validity measure subscales. Internal consistency was α > 0.70 for each of the five domains. Subscale structure was generally confirmed: 86% of correlations between CNRS and validity subscales were significant. There were no ceiling effects. Item to subscale correlations indicated adequate reliability for total scale and subdomains. NPI-Q and CNRS scores were correlated, and 86.4% (19/22) of conceptually related subscales were significant. The CNRS is a reliable and valid measure of cerebellar neuropsychiatry. Further development can refine the instrument and shed light on the patient experience of their affective dysregulation and its clinical meaningfulness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebellum
Cerebellum 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction. The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging. The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.
期刊最新文献
The Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale: A New Card in the Deck. The Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale. A Gene-Expression Based Comparison of Murine and Human Inhibitory Interneurons in the Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei. Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes. MRI Shrimp Sign and Parietooccipital Lesion in Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1