Advancing the use of metabarcoding derived nematode-based indices as soil health bioindicators in agricultural and natural environments

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109772
Helen L. Hayden, Reza Ghaderi, Conrad Trollip, Hang-Wei Hu, Ji-Zheng He
{"title":"Advancing the use of metabarcoding derived nematode-based indices as soil health bioindicators in agricultural and natural environments","authors":"Helen L. Hayden, Reza Ghaderi, Conrad Trollip, Hang-Wei Hu, Ji-Zheng He","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective frameworks for assessing soil health are a priority, yet the value and adoption of soil biological indicators remain debated. Biological indicators provide essential information on ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling, population regulation, and organic matter decomposition. Nematode-based indices (NBIs) have long been used by soil ecologists to study biodiversity, the soil food web and ecosystem functions. DNA metabarcoding of soil nematode communities is being increasingly used as a more cost-efficient and high-throughput approach than traditional morphology-based identification. Molecular-based NBIs have great potential as soil health bioindicators if method uncertainties can be addressed. We critically review recent nematode metabarcoding methods for soils and highlight the advantages and limitations associated with different workflow steps including the nematode elutriation method, DNA extraction method, barcode and primer choices, and database selection. Based on an analysis of 95 studies, we propose an updated standardised metabarcoding workflow that includes (a) nematode elutriation from large soil quantities, (b) bulk nematode DNA extraction, (c) the use of the 18S rRNA primers NF1/18Sr2b and (d) curated reference databases for sequence identification. While challenges in concordance between molecular and morphological NBIs remain, improved standardisation of DNA metabarcoding protocols may enable more detailed investigations of nematode distribution across diverse environments and testing of molecular-based NBIs in relation to soil disturbances, management practices, temporal scales, soil functional processes, and soil physicochemical properties. These efforts could strengthen the inclusion of NBIs in models and frameworks supporting soil health management strategies.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109772","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective frameworks for assessing soil health are a priority, yet the value and adoption of soil biological indicators remain debated. Biological indicators provide essential information on ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling, population regulation, and organic matter decomposition. Nematode-based indices (NBIs) have long been used by soil ecologists to study biodiversity, the soil food web and ecosystem functions. DNA metabarcoding of soil nematode communities is being increasingly used as a more cost-efficient and high-throughput approach than traditional morphology-based identification. Molecular-based NBIs have great potential as soil health bioindicators if method uncertainties can be addressed. We critically review recent nematode metabarcoding methods for soils and highlight the advantages and limitations associated with different workflow steps including the nematode elutriation method, DNA extraction method, barcode and primer choices, and database selection. Based on an analysis of 95 studies, we propose an updated standardised metabarcoding workflow that includes (a) nematode elutriation from large soil quantities, (b) bulk nematode DNA extraction, (c) the use of the 18S rRNA primers NF1/18Sr2b and (d) curated reference databases for sequence identification. While challenges in concordance between molecular and morphological NBIs remain, improved standardisation of DNA metabarcoding protocols may enable more detailed investigations of nematode distribution across diverse environments and testing of molecular-based NBIs in relation to soil disturbances, management practices, temporal scales, soil functional processes, and soil physicochemical properties. These efforts could strengthen the inclusion of NBIs in models and frameworks supporting soil health management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Experimental evidence that soil fauna drives plant root exudation patterns Differences between priming and rhizosphere priming effects: concepts and mechanisms Advancing the use of metabarcoding derived nematode-based indices as soil health bioindicators in agricultural and natural environments Potential Viral Influence on Sulfur Metabolism in Acid Sulfate Soils Probing the pump: soil carbon dynamics, microbial carbon use efficiency and community composition in response to stoichiometrically-balanced compost and biochar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1