Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: overall survival and exploratory analyses of the NRG GY018 phase 3 randomized trial
Ramez N. Eskander, Michael W. Sill, Lindsey Beffa, Richard G. Moore, Joanie M. Hope, Fernanda B. Musa, Robert S. Mannel, Mark S. Shahin, Guilherme H. Cantuaria, Eugenia Girda, Elizabeth Lokich, Juraj Kavecansky, Charles A. Leath, Lilian T. Gien, Emily M. Hinchcliff, Shashikant B. Lele, Lisa M. Landrum, Floor Backes, Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill, Tareq Al Baghdadi, Emily K. Hill, Premal H. Thaker, Veena S. John, Stephen Welch, Amanda N. Fader, Matthew A. Powell, Carol Aghajanian
{"title":"Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: overall survival and exploratory analyses of the NRG GY018 phase 3 randomized trial","authors":"Ramez N. Eskander, Michael W. Sill, Lindsey Beffa, Richard G. Moore, Joanie M. Hope, Fernanda B. Musa, Robert S. Mannel, Mark S. Shahin, Guilherme H. Cantuaria, Eugenia Girda, Elizabeth Lokich, Juraj Kavecansky, Charles A. Leath, Lilian T. Gien, Emily M. Hinchcliff, Shashikant B. Lele, Lisa M. Landrum, Floor Backes, Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill, Tareq Al Baghdadi, Emily K. Hill, Premal H. Thaker, Veena S. John, Stephen Welch, Amanda N. Fader, Matthew A. Powell, Carol Aghajanian","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03566-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historically, the treatment of patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer included paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy resulted in improved clinical outcomes in several solid tumors. In the phase 3 NRG GY018 study, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic/recurrent endometrial cancer regardless of mismatch repair status. Here we report on key secondary endpoints and exploratory analyses. Patients were women ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed stage III or IVA endometrial cancer with measurable disease, or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease. Patients (<i>n</i> = 810) were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab or placebo plus paclitaxel–carboplatin followed by maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 24 months. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint and PFS per RECIST v.1.1 by blinded independent central review was an exploratory endpoint. Overall survival data were immature; hazard ratios favored pembrolizumab (mismatch repair-proficient: 0.79 (0.53–1.17); 1-sided nominal <i>P</i> = 0.1157; mismatch repair-deficient: 0.55 (0.25–1.19); 1-sided nominal <i>P</i> = 0.0617). Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for PFS per blinded independent central review favored pembrolizumab (mismatch repair-proficient: 0.64 (0.49–0.85); <i>P</i> = 0.0008; mismatch repair-deficient: 0.45 (0.27–0.73); <i>P</i> = 0.0005). These findings further support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer regardless of mismatch repair status. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03914612.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03566-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historically, the treatment of patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer included paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy resulted in improved clinical outcomes in several solid tumors. In the phase 3 NRG GY018 study, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic/recurrent endometrial cancer regardless of mismatch repair status. Here we report on key secondary endpoints and exploratory analyses. Patients were women ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed stage III or IVA endometrial cancer with measurable disease, or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease. Patients (n = 810) were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab or placebo plus paclitaxel–carboplatin followed by maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 24 months. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint and PFS per RECIST v.1.1 by blinded independent central review was an exploratory endpoint. Overall survival data were immature; hazard ratios favored pembrolizumab (mismatch repair-proficient: 0.79 (0.53–1.17); 1-sided nominal P = 0.1157; mismatch repair-deficient: 0.55 (0.25–1.19); 1-sided nominal P = 0.0617). Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for PFS per blinded independent central review favored pembrolizumab (mismatch repair-proficient: 0.64 (0.49–0.85); P = 0.0008; mismatch repair-deficient: 0.45 (0.27–0.73); P = 0.0005). These findings further support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer regardless of mismatch repair status. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03914612.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.