Exploring public perceptions of dementia on Twitter (X): a cross-cultural analysis

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/alz.70042
Saowaluk Srikajornlarp, Tassanee Lerksuthirat, Pattama Patpong, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul, Tanchanok Chattaris
{"title":"Exploring public perceptions of dementia on Twitter (X): a cross-cultural analysis","authors":"Saowaluk Srikajornlarp,&nbsp;Tassanee Lerksuthirat,&nbsp;Pattama Patpong,&nbsp;Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul,&nbsp;Tanchanok Chattaris","doi":"10.1002/alz.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Twitter (X) is widely used to reflect individual perspectives. We wished to study social insight regarding dementia using this digital platform.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional study retrieving tweets containing “dementia” or “#dementia” and their Thai equivalents. English tweets were randomly selected, while all Thai tweets were collected. We identified user types, topics, and sentiments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Of 10,062 English and 9511 Thai tweets, general users were the most prevalent in both languages. “Dementia” was used accurately in 39.0% of English tweets and as misinformation in 49.2% of Thai tweets. Stigma was significantly more common in English (38.9%) than in Thai (22.6%) tweets (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), and negative perceptions were expressed in 44.2% and 81.3% of English and Thai tweets, respectively (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Different inappropriate uses of “dementia” were observed. To alleviate negative perceptions, reducing stigmatization is urgently needed in English-speaking communities, whereas in Thailand, appropriate dementia education should be undertaken immediately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>We found differences in the perceptions of “dementia” between English and Thai tweets.</li>\n \n <li>Using “dementia” to attack individuals was common among English Twitter (X) users.</li>\n \n <li>“Misinformation” regarding the term “dementia” was observed among Thai users.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Twitter (X) is widely used to reflect individual perspectives. We wished to study social insight regarding dementia using this digital platform.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study retrieving tweets containing “dementia” or “#dementia” and their Thai equivalents. English tweets were randomly selected, while all Thai tweets were collected. We identified user types, topics, and sentiments.

RESULTS

Of 10,062 English and 9511 Thai tweets, general users were the most prevalent in both languages. “Dementia” was used accurately in 39.0% of English tweets and as misinformation in 49.2% of Thai tweets. Stigma was significantly more common in English (38.9%) than in Thai (22.6%) tweets (p-value < 0.001), and negative perceptions were expressed in 44.2% and 81.3% of English and Thai tweets, respectively (p-value < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Different inappropriate uses of “dementia” were observed. To alleviate negative perceptions, reducing stigmatization is urgently needed in English-speaking communities, whereas in Thailand, appropriate dementia education should be undertaken immediately.

Highlights

  • We found differences in the perceptions of “dementia” between English and Thai tweets.
  • Using “dementia” to attack individuals was common among English Twitter (X) users.
  • “Misinformation” regarding the term “dementia” was observed among Thai users.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Association of neighborhood disadvantage with cognitive function and cortical disorganization in an unimpaired cohort: An exploratory study Using remote, digital, multi-day testing to characterize long-term forgetting in cognitively unimpaired older adults Dementia in a resource-constrained sub-Saharan African setting: A comprehensive retrospective analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and management at the only neuropsychiatric facility in Northeastern Nigeria HDAC11 displays neuropathological alterations and offers as a novel drug target for Alzheimer's disease Interactions between menopause and high-fat diet on cognition and pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1