Exploring public perceptions of dementia on Twitter (X): a cross-cultural analysis

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/alz.70042
Saowaluk Srikajornlarp, Tassanee Lerksuthirat, Pattama Patpong, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul, Tanchanok Chattaris
{"title":"Exploring public perceptions of dementia on Twitter (X): a cross-cultural analysis","authors":"Saowaluk Srikajornlarp,&nbsp;Tassanee Lerksuthirat,&nbsp;Pattama Patpong,&nbsp;Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul,&nbsp;Tanchanok Chattaris","doi":"10.1002/alz.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Twitter (X) is widely used to reflect individual perspectives. We wished to study social insight regarding dementia using this digital platform.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional study retrieving tweets containing “dementia” or “#dementia” and their Thai equivalents. English tweets were randomly selected, while all Thai tweets were collected. We identified user types, topics, and sentiments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Of 10,062 English and 9511 Thai tweets, general users were the most prevalent in both languages. “Dementia” was used accurately in 39.0% of English tweets and as misinformation in 49.2% of Thai tweets. Stigma was significantly more common in English (38.9%) than in Thai (22.6%) tweets (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), and negative perceptions were expressed in 44.2% and 81.3% of English and Thai tweets, respectively (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Different inappropriate uses of “dementia” were observed. To alleviate negative perceptions, reducing stigmatization is urgently needed in English-speaking communities, whereas in Thailand, appropriate dementia education should be undertaken immediately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>We found differences in the perceptions of “dementia” between English and Thai tweets.</li>\n \n <li>Using “dementia” to attack individuals was common among English Twitter (X) users.</li>\n \n <li>“Misinformation” regarding the term “dementia” was observed among Thai users.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Twitter (X) is widely used to reflect individual perspectives. We wished to study social insight regarding dementia using this digital platform.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study retrieving tweets containing “dementia” or “#dementia” and their Thai equivalents. English tweets were randomly selected, while all Thai tweets were collected. We identified user types, topics, and sentiments.

RESULTS

Of 10,062 English and 9511 Thai tweets, general users were the most prevalent in both languages. “Dementia” was used accurately in 39.0% of English tweets and as misinformation in 49.2% of Thai tweets. Stigma was significantly more common in English (38.9%) than in Thai (22.6%) tweets (p-value < 0.001), and negative perceptions were expressed in 44.2% and 81.3% of English and Thai tweets, respectively (p-value < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Different inappropriate uses of “dementia” were observed. To alleviate negative perceptions, reducing stigmatization is urgently needed in English-speaking communities, whereas in Thailand, appropriate dementia education should be undertaken immediately.

Highlights

  • We found differences in the perceptions of “dementia” between English and Thai tweets.
  • Using “dementia” to attack individuals was common among English Twitter (X) users.
  • “Misinformation” regarding the term “dementia” was observed among Thai users.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索Twitter (X)上公众对痴呆症的看法:一项跨文化分析
Twitter (X)被广泛用于反映个人观点。我们希望通过这个数字平台来研究关于痴呆症的社会洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of novel cognitive tests in Mandarin-speaking older Americans Spatially resolved transcriptomic profiling identifies distinct signatures in parenchymal and vascular microenvironments in Alzheimer's Disease with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy The partnership between the Alzheimer's Association, Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs), and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) in advancing Alzheimer's disease research and care Correction to “Effect of tau burden and Lewy pathology on neuropsychiatric symptoms in Aβ‐positive individuals” Clinical meaningfulness of anti‐amyloid therapies in early Alzheimer's disease: Perspectives from the East and Southeast Asia region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1