Capture of Group A Streptococcus by open‐microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/btm2.70001
Wan‐chen Tu, Ingrid H. Robertson, Andrea Blom, Elena Alfaro, Victoria A. M. Shinkawa, Daniel B. Hatchett, Juan C. Sanchez, Anika M. McManamen, Xiaojing Su, Erwin Berthier, Sanitta Thongpang, Ellen R. Wald, Gregory P. DeMuri, Ashleigh B. Theberge
{"title":"Capture of Group A Streptococcus by open‐microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients","authors":"Wan‐chen Tu, Ingrid H. Robertson, Andrea Blom, Elena Alfaro, Victoria A. M. Shinkawa, Daniel B. Hatchett, Juan C. Sanchez, Anika M. McManamen, Xiaojing Su, Erwin Berthier, Sanitta Thongpang, Ellen R. Wald, Gregory P. DeMuri, Ashleigh B. Theberge","doi":"10.1002/btm2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State the PurposeObtaining high‐quality samples to diagnose streptococcal pharyngitis in pediatric patients is challenging due to discomfort associated with traditional pharyngeal swabs. This may cause reluctance to go to the clinic, inaccurate diagnosis, or inappropriate treatment for children with sore throats. Here, we determined the efficacy of CandyCollect, a lollipop‐inspired open‐microfluidic pathogen collection device, to capture Group A <jats:italic>Streptococcus</jats:italic> (GAS) and compare user preference for CandyCollect, conventional pharyngeal swabs, or mouth swabs in children with pharyngitis and their caregivers.ResultsAll child participants (30/30) were positive for GAS by qPCR on both the mouth swab and CandyCollect. Caregivers ranked CandyCollect as a good sampling method overall (27/30), and all caregivers (30/30) would recommend CandyCollect for children 5 years and older. Twenty‐three of 30 children “really like” the taste and 24/30 would prefer to use CandyCollect if a future test were needed. All caregivers (30/30) and most children (28/30) would be willing to use CandyCollect at home.ConclusionAll participants tested positive for GAS on all three collection methods (pharyngeal swab, mouth swab, and CandyCollect). While both caregivers and children like CandyCollect, some caregivers would prefer a shorter collection time. Future work includes additional studies with larger cohorts presenting with pharyngitis of unknown etiology and shortening collection time while maintaining the attractive form of the device.","PeriodicalId":9263,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State the PurposeObtaining high‐quality samples to diagnose streptococcal pharyngitis in pediatric patients is challenging due to discomfort associated with traditional pharyngeal swabs. This may cause reluctance to go to the clinic, inaccurate diagnosis, or inappropriate treatment for children with sore throats. Here, we determined the efficacy of CandyCollect, a lollipop‐inspired open‐microfluidic pathogen collection device, to capture Group A Streptococcus (GAS) and compare user preference for CandyCollect, conventional pharyngeal swabs, or mouth swabs in children with pharyngitis and their caregivers.ResultsAll child participants (30/30) were positive for GAS by qPCR on both the mouth swab and CandyCollect. Caregivers ranked CandyCollect as a good sampling method overall (27/30), and all caregivers (30/30) would recommend CandyCollect for children 5 years and older. Twenty‐three of 30 children “really like” the taste and 24/30 would prefer to use CandyCollect if a future test were needed. All caregivers (30/30) and most children (28/30) would be willing to use CandyCollect at home.ConclusionAll participants tested positive for GAS on all three collection methods (pharyngeal swab, mouth swab, and CandyCollect). While both caregivers and children like CandyCollect, some caregivers would prefer a shorter collection time. Future work includes additional studies with larger cohorts presenting with pharyngitis of unknown etiology and shortening collection time while maintaining the attractive form of the device.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
150
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, an official, peer-reviewed online open-access journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Society for Biological Engineering (SBE), focuses on how chemical and biological engineering approaches drive innovative technologies and solutions that impact clinical practice and commercial healthcare products.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Integrated ATAC‐seq and RNA‐seq analysis identifies key regulatory elements in NK cells activated with feeder cells and IL‐2 Capture of Group A Streptococcus by open‐microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients Biomembrane‐coated nanosystems as next‐generation delivery systems for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers Noninvasive monitoring of vascular alterations in mice with acute lower limb ischemia using multimodal photoacoustic imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1