Phylogenomics of marine angelfishes: diagnosing sources of systematic discordance for an iconic reef fish family (F: Pomacanthidae)

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Systematic Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syaf016
Lauriane M Baraf, Julia Y Hung, Peter F Cowman
{"title":"Phylogenomics of marine angelfishes: diagnosing sources of systematic discordance for an iconic reef fish family (F: Pomacanthidae)","authors":"Lauriane M Baraf, Julia Y Hung, Peter F Cowman","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genome-scale datasets are resolving challenging nodes across the tree of life. These datasets however, characterized by inherent heterogeneity, often push traditional phylogenetic reconstruction methods to their limits. By integrating multiple phylogenomic approaches, we can identify the causes of topological discordance within genomic partitions while accounting for various sources of heterogeneity and systematic errors. Here we conduct the first in-depth analysis of discordance for the reef family Pomacanthidae (marine angelfishes) using target enrichment data of ~1,000 ultraconserved elements from 45 pomacanthid species. Our combined phylogenomic approach resolved the systematics of the family at the base of the pomacanthid tree. Despite this resolution, our analyses also highlight discordance in ancestral nodes associated with the paraphyletic Centropyge genus and monotypic Pygoplites lineage, and the impact of incomplete lineage sorting in the evolutionary history pomacanthids. Species network searches and model selection supported a reticulated evolutionary history suggesting three ancient gene flow events between ghost (or unsampled) lineages at the root of the Pomacanthidae tree and ancestors of Genicanthus, Centropyge, Chaetodontoplus and Pomacanthus lineages. This study advances our understanding of diagnosing topological discordance in genome-scale phylogenies and provide an analytical pathway for limiting systematic errors. In the process of diagnosing discordance, we identify key evolutionary processes involved in the complex evolution of marine angelfishes. While often inconvenient in phylogenetic analyses, patterns of discordance can shed light on underlying biological and evolutionary processes that shape the evolution of biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome-scale datasets are resolving challenging nodes across the tree of life. These datasets however, characterized by inherent heterogeneity, often push traditional phylogenetic reconstruction methods to their limits. By integrating multiple phylogenomic approaches, we can identify the causes of topological discordance within genomic partitions while accounting for various sources of heterogeneity and systematic errors. Here we conduct the first in-depth analysis of discordance for the reef family Pomacanthidae (marine angelfishes) using target enrichment data of ~1,000 ultraconserved elements from 45 pomacanthid species. Our combined phylogenomic approach resolved the systematics of the family at the base of the pomacanthid tree. Despite this resolution, our analyses also highlight discordance in ancestral nodes associated with the paraphyletic Centropyge genus and monotypic Pygoplites lineage, and the impact of incomplete lineage sorting in the evolutionary history pomacanthids. Species network searches and model selection supported a reticulated evolutionary history suggesting three ancient gene flow events between ghost (or unsampled) lineages at the root of the Pomacanthidae tree and ancestors of Genicanthus, Centropyge, Chaetodontoplus and Pomacanthus lineages. This study advances our understanding of diagnosing topological discordance in genome-scale phylogenies and provide an analytical pathway for limiting systematic errors. In the process of diagnosing discordance, we identify key evolutionary processes involved in the complex evolution of marine angelfishes. While often inconvenient in phylogenetic analyses, patterns of discordance can shed light on underlying biological and evolutionary processes that shape the evolution of biodiversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Aquatic biotas of Sundaland are fragmented but not refugial Phylogenomics of marine angelfishes: diagnosing sources of systematic discordance for an iconic reef fish family (F: Pomacanthidae) Improved robustness to gene tree incompleteness, estimation errors, and systematic homology errors with weighted TREE-QMC Repeated Evolution of Storage Root and Invasions of Alpine Biome Drove Replicated Radiations of the Megadiverse Corydalis (Papaveraceae) in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Recent, Intricate Speciation in Amazonia Uncovered by a Multilayered Genomic Analysis of Tree Squirrels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1