Comparative Analysis of Social Cognitive and Neurocognitive Performance Across Autism and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbaf005
Ayesha G Rashidi, Lindsay D Oliver, Iska Moxon-Emre, Colin Hawco, Erin W Dickie, Ruyi Pan, Maria T Secara, Ju-Chi Yu, Peter Szatmari, Pushpal Desarkar, George Foussias, Robert W Buchanan, Anil K Malhotra, Meng-Chuan Lai, Aristotle N Voineskos, Stephanie H Ameis
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Social Cognitive and Neurocognitive Performance Across Autism and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders","authors":"Ayesha G Rashidi, Lindsay D Oliver, Iska Moxon-Emre, Colin Hawco, Erin W Dickie, Ruyi Pan, Maria T Secara, Ju-Chi Yu, Peter Szatmari, Pushpal Desarkar, George Foussias, Robert W Buchanan, Anil K Malhotra, Meng-Chuan Lai, Aristotle N Voineskos, Stephanie H Ameis","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis Social cognitive and neurocognitive performance is impacted in autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Here, we compared social cognitive and neurocognitive performance across a large transdiagnostic sample of participants with autism, SSDs, and typically developing controls (TDCs). Study Design Participants (total N = 584; autism N = 100, SSDs N = 275, TDCs N = 209; aged 16–55 years; 61% male assigned at birth) completed lower-level (eg, emotion processing) and higher-level (eg, theory of mind) social cognitive tasks, the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and a measure of social functioning. Nonparametric groupwise comparisons were undertaken, adjusting for age and sex, and within-group correlations were used to examine associations between social cognition, neurocognition, and social functioning. Study Results Autistic and SSD groups performed worse than TDCs on lower- and higher-level social cognitive tasks, with few autism–SSD differences found. Autism and SSDs had lower neurocognitive scores than TDCs; SSDs demonstrated lower processing speed, working memory, verbal learning, and visual learning versus autism. Positive associations between social cognitive tasks and neurocognition were observed across groups, and self-reported measures of empathy were consistently correlated with social functioning. Conclusions This study represents the largest transdiagnostic comparison of both social cognition and neurocognition in an autism/SSD sample reported to date. Autistic participants and those with SSDs showed similar performance on lower- and higher-level social cognitive tasks relative to controls, while neurocognition was less impacted in autism versus SSDs. These findings underscore the importance of transdiagnostic research into the mechanisms underlying social cognitive deficits and highlight the potential for developing transdiagnostic interventions.","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaf005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Social cognitive and neurocognitive performance is impacted in autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Here, we compared social cognitive and neurocognitive performance across a large transdiagnostic sample of participants with autism, SSDs, and typically developing controls (TDCs). Study Design Participants (total N = 584; autism N = 100, SSDs N = 275, TDCs N = 209; aged 16–55 years; 61% male assigned at birth) completed lower-level (eg, emotion processing) and higher-level (eg, theory of mind) social cognitive tasks, the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and a measure of social functioning. Nonparametric groupwise comparisons were undertaken, adjusting for age and sex, and within-group correlations were used to examine associations between social cognition, neurocognition, and social functioning. Study Results Autistic and SSD groups performed worse than TDCs on lower- and higher-level social cognitive tasks, with few autism–SSD differences found. Autism and SSDs had lower neurocognitive scores than TDCs; SSDs demonstrated lower processing speed, working memory, verbal learning, and visual learning versus autism. Positive associations between social cognitive tasks and neurocognition were observed across groups, and self-reported measures of empathy were consistently correlated with social functioning. Conclusions This study represents the largest transdiagnostic comparison of both social cognition and neurocognition in an autism/SSD sample reported to date. Autistic participants and those with SSDs showed similar performance on lower- and higher-level social cognitive tasks relative to controls, while neurocognition was less impacted in autism versus SSDs. These findings underscore the importance of transdiagnostic research into the mechanisms underlying social cognitive deficits and highlight the potential for developing transdiagnostic interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症和精神分裂症谱系障碍患者社会认知和神经认知表现的比较分析
背景与假设自闭症和精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)患者的社会认知和神经认知能力受到影响。在这里,我们比较了自闭症、ssd和典型发展对照(TDCs)参与者的社会认知和神经认知表现。研究设计参与者(总N = 584;自闭症患者100例,ssd患者275例,TDCs患者209例;16-55岁;61%的男性在出生时被分配)完成较低水平(如情绪处理)和较高水平(如心理理论)的社会认知任务、matrix共识认知电池和社会功能测量。进行了非参数组比较,调整了年龄和性别,并使用组内相关性来检查社会认知、神经认知和社会功能之间的关联。研究结果自闭症和SSD组在较低和较高水平的社会认知任务上的表现比tdc组差,自闭症和SSD组之间的差异很少。自闭症和ssd患者的神经认知评分低于tdc患者;与自闭症相比,ssd表现出较低的处理速度、工作记忆、语言学习和视觉学习。社会认知任务和神经认知之间存在正相关,自我报告的共情测量与社会功能一致相关。本研究代表了迄今为止报道的自闭症/SSD样本中最大的社会认知和神经认知的跨诊断比较。与对照组相比,自闭症参与者和患有固态硬盘的参与者在低级和高级社会认知任务上的表现相似,而自闭症参与者的神经认知能力受到的影响较小。这些发现强调了对社会认知缺陷机制进行跨诊断研究的重要性,并强调了开发跨诊断干预措施的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
期刊最新文献
Neurophysiological Resting-State Markers of Catatonia in Schizophrenia and Mood Disorders A Systematic Review of Women’s Cancer Screening and Mortality in Women with Severe Mental Illness Symptom Network Dynamics during Antipsychotic Treatment in First-Episode Psychosis Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Cardiometabolic Outcomes in First-Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Neuroanatomical Deficits in Visual Cortex Subregions of Individuals With Psychosis Spectrum Disorders Linked to Symptoms, Cognition, and Childhood Trauma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1