Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medication on Disability and Mortality in Older Adults: Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea

Hee-Won Jung, So Jin Park, Hoyol Jhang, Kyunik Park, Jiyeon Baek, Mirinae Lee, Seul-gi Han, Woo-Youn Kim, Dahye Kim, Ji Eun Yun, Sun-wook Kim
{"title":"Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medication on Disability and Mortality in Older Adults: Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea","authors":"Hee-Won Jung, So Jin Park, Hoyol Jhang, Kyunik Park, Jiyeon Baek, Mirinae Lee, Seul-gi Han, Woo-Youn Kim, Dahye Kim, Ji Eun Yun, Sun-wook Kim","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults. However, the long-term effects of PIMs, particularly considering frailty and polypharmacy, remain unclear. Methods We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service and the National Screening Program for Transitional Ages (NSPTA) in Korea, including individuals aged 66 who participated between 2015 and 2016. Participants were categorized into PIM and No PIM groups based on prescriptions, with frailty index calculated from NSPTA results. Outcomes were tracked over 6.77 years. The primary outcome was disability; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint of death or disability. The association between PIM and adverse outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results A total of 564,036 individuals were included. During follow-up, 10,735 (1.9%) developed disabilities, and 17,887 (3.1%) died. The PIM group (64.4%) showed higher risks of disability (2.3% vs. 1.2%) and mortality (3.6% vs. 2.4%) compared to the No PIM group (P < 0.001). The composite outcome was also more frequent in the PIM group (5.3%) compared to the No PIM group (3.2%) (P < 0.001). PIM use was associated with increased risks of disability (HR 1.22 [95% CI 1.16, 1.28]), mortality (HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.11, 1.19]), and the composite outcome (HR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13, 1.20]), even after adjusting for frailty and polypharmacy. Furthermore, as the number of PIMs increased (0, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5), the risks of disability, mortality, and the composite outcome also significantly increased (all P < 0.001). Conclusion PIM use in older adults raises risk of disability and mortality, even after adjusting to frailty and polypharmacy, and the impact grows with the number of PIMs prescribed.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults. However, the long-term effects of PIMs, particularly considering frailty and polypharmacy, remain unclear. Methods We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service and the National Screening Program for Transitional Ages (NSPTA) in Korea, including individuals aged 66 who participated between 2015 and 2016. Participants were categorized into PIM and No PIM groups based on prescriptions, with frailty index calculated from NSPTA results. Outcomes were tracked over 6.77 years. The primary outcome was disability; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint of death or disability. The association between PIM and adverse outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results A total of 564,036 individuals were included. During follow-up, 10,735 (1.9%) developed disabilities, and 17,887 (3.1%) died. The PIM group (64.4%) showed higher risks of disability (2.3% vs. 1.2%) and mortality (3.6% vs. 2.4%) compared to the No PIM group (P < 0.001). The composite outcome was also more frequent in the PIM group (5.3%) compared to the No PIM group (3.2%) (P < 0.001). PIM use was associated with increased risks of disability (HR 1.22 [95% CI 1.16, 1.28]), mortality (HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.11, 1.19]), and the composite outcome (HR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13, 1.20]), even after adjusting for frailty and polypharmacy. Furthermore, as the number of PIMs increased (0, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5), the risks of disability, mortality, and the composite outcome also significantly increased (all P < 0.001). Conclusion PIM use in older adults raises risk of disability and mortality, even after adjusting to frailty and polypharmacy, and the impact grows with the number of PIMs prescribed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are Maximal Power and Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Older and Very Old Adults Dependent on their Level of Physical Activity? Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medication on Disability and Mortality in Older Adults: Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea Upregulation of COX-2 and NADPH oxidase and reduced eNOS in perivascular adipose tissue are associated with resistance artery dysfunction and hypertension in naturally aged mice A Preliminary Usability Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-based, motion-detecting Wearable device: the Geriatric Functional Assessment System Using computational video analysis in ageing mice to evaluate the effects of chronic monotherapy, polypharmacy and deprescribing over time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1