Oxygen isotope values of charred tree bark as an indicator of forest fire severity

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100786
Elizabeth McDonald , Elizabeth A. Webb , Jeffery P. Dech
{"title":"Oxygen isotope values of charred tree bark as an indicator of forest fire severity","authors":"Elizabeth McDonald ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Webb ,&nbsp;Jeffery P. Dech","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to determine if oxygen isotope values of charred tree bark could be used to reconstruct fire severity. The study was completed north of River Valley, Ontario, Canada, where a wildfire burned approximately 2500 hectares of white pine (<em>Pinus strobus</em> L.) forest in 2018. We established a network of field plots, collected charred bark samples from standing white pine stems, and estimated burn severity based on a standard field assessment protocol known as the Composite Burn Index (CBI). We also analyzed pre- and post-fire Sentinel-2 imagery of the burn area to compute various Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR)-based change detection algorithms, which are known to produce reliable predictions of CBI. We developed simple linear regression models to predict CBI using either the <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O values of charred bark or versions of the NBR. Models developed from the <em>δ</em>18O values of charred bark revealed a significant negative relationship between CBI and plot-level <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O, with the strongest relationship being with maximum <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.179, RMSE = 0.565). There were significant positive relationships between all NBR indices and CBI, with better fit statistics than the <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O models. The results demonstrate that <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O can be used as a predictor of fire severity; however, the scale of measurement of fire severity is finer (tree-level) than the plot-level CBI and NBR indices. The advantage of using the <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O method is that it can be used to reconstruct fire severity when satellite or field data are unavailable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if oxygen isotope values of charred tree bark could be used to reconstruct fire severity. The study was completed north of River Valley, Ontario, Canada, where a wildfire burned approximately 2500 hectares of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) forest in 2018. We established a network of field plots, collected charred bark samples from standing white pine stems, and estimated burn severity based on a standard field assessment protocol known as the Composite Burn Index (CBI). We also analyzed pre- and post-fire Sentinel-2 imagery of the burn area to compute various Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR)-based change detection algorithms, which are known to produce reliable predictions of CBI. We developed simple linear regression models to predict CBI using either the δ18O values of charred bark or versions of the NBR. Models developed from the δ18O values of charred bark revealed a significant negative relationship between CBI and plot-level δ18O, with the strongest relationship being with maximum δ18O (r2 = 0.179, RMSE = 0.565). There were significant positive relationships between all NBR indices and CBI, with better fit statistics than the δ18O models. The results demonstrate that δ18O can be used as a predictor of fire severity; however, the scale of measurement of fire severity is finer (tree-level) than the plot-level CBI and NBR indices. The advantage of using the δ18O method is that it can be used to reconstruct fire severity when satellite or field data are unavailable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧焦树皮的氧同位素值作为森林火灾严重程度的指标
本研究的目的是确定烧焦树皮的氧同位素值是否可以用来重建火灾的严重程度。这项研究是在加拿大安大略省河谷北部完成的,2018年,一场野火烧毁了大约2500公顷的白松森林。我们建立了一个野外地块网络,从直立的白松茎上收集烧焦树皮样本,并根据称为复合烧伤指数(CBI)的标准野外评估方案估计烧伤严重程度。我们还分析了火灾前和火灾后的Sentinel-2烧伤区域图像,以计算各种基于归一化烧伤比(NBR)的变化检测算法,这些算法已知可以产生可靠的CBI预测。我们开发了简单的线性回归模型,利用烧焦树皮或NBR的δ18O值来预测CBI。根据烧焦树皮的δ18O值建立的模型显示,CBI与样点水平的δ18O呈显著负相关,与最大δ18O的关系最强(r2 = 0.179, RMSE = 0.565)。NBR各指标与CBI呈显著正相关,拟合统计结果优于δ18O模型。结果表明:δ18O可以作为火灾严重程度的预测因子;然而,火灾严重程度的测量尺度(树级)比样地级CBI和NBR指数更精细。使用δ18O方法的优点是,当卫星或野外数据不可用时,它可以用来重建火灾严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tree shade mitigates stress and enhances chickpea productivity: Insights from an Emblica officinalis-based agroforestry system in semi-arid shallow Basaltic Deccan Plateau, India The vacuum system increases maple sap yield without extending the sugar season How does biodiversity monitoring impact those who conduct it? Reported outcomes and perspectives of a field team in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia Mixed plantations of Alnus formosana and Pinus massoniana improve ecosystem multifunctionality than monoculture plantations Integrated climate governance framework for forest fire management: A hypothetical application in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1