How and when AI-driven HRM promotes employee resilience and adaptive performance: A self-determination theory

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115279
Hoa Do , Lin Xiao Chu , Helen Shipton
{"title":"How and when AI-driven HRM promotes employee resilience and adaptive performance: A self-determination theory","authors":"Hoa Do ,&nbsp;Lin Xiao Chu ,&nbsp;Helen Shipton","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing research on AI in HRM, gaps remain, particularly in understanding the mechanisms through which AI-driven HRM influences employee outcomes. This study addresses this gap by developing a conceptual model to examine how AI-driven HRM impacts employee resilience and adaptive performance. Based on self-determination theory, the model proposes that employee exploration mediates the relationships between AI-driven HRM and employee outcomes. Additionally, trust in AI moderates these relationships. Two studies were conducted to test the hypotheses: Study 1 developed and validated a 12-item AI-driven HRM scale across three samples: 50 managers, 150 employees for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 150 employees for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Study 2, with data from 274 US employees through a three-wave survey, explored the effects of AI-driven HRM on resilience and performance. Results from Study 2 supported all proposed relationships, thereby offering important implications for both theory and practice in the AI-driven HRM field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 115279"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500102X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing research on AI in HRM, gaps remain, particularly in understanding the mechanisms through which AI-driven HRM influences employee outcomes. This study addresses this gap by developing a conceptual model to examine how AI-driven HRM impacts employee resilience and adaptive performance. Based on self-determination theory, the model proposes that employee exploration mediates the relationships between AI-driven HRM and employee outcomes. Additionally, trust in AI moderates these relationships. Two studies were conducted to test the hypotheses: Study 1 developed and validated a 12-item AI-driven HRM scale across three samples: 50 managers, 150 employees for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 150 employees for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Study 2, with data from 274 US employees through a three-wave survey, explored the effects of AI-driven HRM on resilience and performance. Results from Study 2 supported all proposed relationships, thereby offering important implications for both theory and practice in the AI-driven HRM field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能驱动的人力资源管理如何以及何时促进员工的弹性和适应性绩效:一种自决理论
尽管人工智能在人力资源管理方面的研究越来越多,但差距仍然存在,特别是在理解人工智能驱动的人力资源管理影响员工成果的机制方面。本研究通过开发一个概念模型来研究人工智能驱动的人力资源管理如何影响员工的弹性和适应性绩效,从而解决了这一差距。该模型基于自我决定理论,提出员工探索在人工智能驱动的人力资源管理与员工成果之间的关系中起中介作用。此外,对人工智能的信任缓和了这些关系。我们进行了两项研究来检验假设:研究1开发并验证了一个由人工智能驱动的12项人力资源管理量表,涵盖三个样本:50名经理,150名员工进行探索性因素分析(EFA), 150名员工进行验证性因素分析(CFA)。研究2通过三波调查收集了274名美国员工的数据,探讨了人工智能驱动的人力资源管理对弹性和绩效的影响。研究2的结果支持了所有提出的关系,从而为人工智能驱动的人力资源管理领域的理论和实践提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1