Wei Jiang, Zhongguo Shu, Yihe Lv, Xukun Su, Xing Wu, Cong Wang, Kai Wang, Siqi Sun, Guohua Liu
{"title":"Quantifying impacts of climate and land use changes on ecosystem services from statistic perspective","authors":"Wei Jiang, Zhongguo Shu, Yihe Lv, Xukun Su, Xing Wu, Cong Wang, Kai Wang, Siqi Sun, Guohua Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitatively analyzing the impacts of climate and land use changes on ecosystem services has drawn increasing attention over the past decade. However, the assessment approach in the existing studies highly depended on scenarios and modeling, which is unable to distinguish the influences of different land use types and different climate characteristics and to quantify the absolute influence levels of multiple driving factors. Here, we adopted the partial correlation analysis for quantifying relationships between ecosystem services and the seemingly unrelated regression model for assessing impacts of climate and land use changes on ecosystem services. Taking Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province in China from 2000 to 2019 as a case study, we focused on four ecosystem services including material provisioning, climate regulation, water regulation, and soil protection and five driving factors including precipitation, temperature, cropland area, forest area, and grassland area. The results identified the positively dominant driving factor of precipitation on material provisioning, water regulation, and soil protection, and the negatively dominant driving factor of cropland area on material provisioning, climate regulation, and water regulation. The synergy relationships were found between material provisioning and climate regulation, between climate regulation and water regulation, and between water regulation and soil protection, while the trade-off relationships were found between material provisioning and water regulation, and between material provisioning and soil protection. These findings support local policy-making, suggesting that management of climate-related risks and land use plan with a restriction on cropland expansion are expected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113285"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500216X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantitatively analyzing the impacts of climate and land use changes on ecosystem services has drawn increasing attention over the past decade. However, the assessment approach in the existing studies highly depended on scenarios and modeling, which is unable to distinguish the influences of different land use types and different climate characteristics and to quantify the absolute influence levels of multiple driving factors. Here, we adopted the partial correlation analysis for quantifying relationships between ecosystem services and the seemingly unrelated regression model for assessing impacts of climate and land use changes on ecosystem services. Taking Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province in China from 2000 to 2019 as a case study, we focused on four ecosystem services including material provisioning, climate regulation, water regulation, and soil protection and five driving factors including precipitation, temperature, cropland area, forest area, and grassland area. The results identified the positively dominant driving factor of precipitation on material provisioning, water regulation, and soil protection, and the negatively dominant driving factor of cropland area on material provisioning, climate regulation, and water regulation. The synergy relationships were found between material provisioning and climate regulation, between climate regulation and water regulation, and between water regulation and soil protection, while the trade-off relationships were found between material provisioning and water regulation, and between material provisioning and soil protection. These findings support local policy-making, suggesting that management of climate-related risks and land use plan with a restriction on cropland expansion are expected.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.