A hybrid machine learning approach for predicting fiber-reinforced polymer-concrete interface bond strength

IF 7.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110458
Sarmed Wahab , Babatunde Abiodun Salami , Hassan Danish , Saad Nisar , Ali H. AlAteah , Ali Alsubeai
{"title":"A hybrid machine learning approach for predicting fiber-reinforced polymer-concrete interface bond strength","authors":"Sarmed Wahab ,&nbsp;Babatunde Abiodun Salami ,&nbsp;Hassan Danish ,&nbsp;Saad Nisar ,&nbsp;Ali H. AlAteah ,&nbsp;Ali Alsubeai","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The interfacial bond strength between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets and concrete is crucial for structural design. This study presented a novel approach using ensemble learning models to predict bond strength and analyze input parameters' influence. No previous research used gene expression programming (GEP) for developing bond strength models in single shear tests. This research introduced GEP to develop an expression for estimating bond strength, comparing its performance with existing empirical models used in design codes.</div><div>Six ensemble machine learning models were tested: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting (LightGBM), categorical boosting (CatBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), random forest (RF), and explainable boosting machine (EBM), using 855 samples. CatBoost demonstrated superior performance with R2 = 0.98, RMSE = 1.61 kN, and MAE = 1.18 kN. The study utilized EBM's interpretability for parametric analysis through local and global explanations. Results showed FRP material and geometric properties had greater impact on bond strength than concrete properties. The novel GEP-developed empirical expression achieved higher accuracy compared to existing empirical models, with R2 = 0.812, RMSE = 4.63 kN, and MAE = 3.58 kN. The GEP model primarily relied on FRP's material and geometric properties, aligning with parametric analysis findings. Based on the results, both the CatBoost ensemble learning model and GEP model are recommended for estimating FRP-concrete interfacial bond strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 110458"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625004580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interfacial bond strength between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets and concrete is crucial for structural design. This study presented a novel approach using ensemble learning models to predict bond strength and analyze input parameters' influence. No previous research used gene expression programming (GEP) for developing bond strength models in single shear tests. This research introduced GEP to develop an expression for estimating bond strength, comparing its performance with existing empirical models used in design codes.
Six ensemble machine learning models were tested: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting (LightGBM), categorical boosting (CatBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), random forest (RF), and explainable boosting machine (EBM), using 855 samples. CatBoost demonstrated superior performance with R2 = 0.98, RMSE = 1.61 kN, and MAE = 1.18 kN. The study utilized EBM's interpretability for parametric analysis through local and global explanations. Results showed FRP material and geometric properties had greater impact on bond strength than concrete properties. The novel GEP-developed empirical expression achieved higher accuracy compared to existing empirical models, with R2 = 0.812, RMSE = 4.63 kN, and MAE = 3.58 kN. The GEP model primarily relied on FRP's material and geometric properties, aligning with parametric analysis findings. Based on the results, both the CatBoost ensemble learning model and GEP model are recommended for estimating FRP-concrete interfacial bond strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
期刊最新文献
Investigate dual chiller characteristics and improve the performance by integrating machine learning and genetic algorithms Decoupled Graph Spatial-Temporal Transformer Networks for traffic flow forecasting A Dynamic Cross-Domain Recommendation Model with Target-Aware Complementary Preference Transfer and Information Fusion Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios Evaluation of medium-lift forest fire helicopter using q-rung orthopair fuzzy set based alternative ranking technique based on adaptive standardized intervals approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1