Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios

IF 7.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110347
Tommaso Botarelli , Marco Fanfani , Paolo Nesi , Lorenzo Pinelli
{"title":"Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios","authors":"Tommaso Botarelli ,&nbsp;Marco Fanfani ,&nbsp;Paolo Nesi ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Navier-Stokes equations used to model fluid dynamic processes are fundamental to address several real-world problems related to energy production, aerospace applications, automotive design, industrial process, etc. However, since in most cases they do not admit any analytical solution, numerical simulations are required in industrial contexts to assess fluid dynamic behaviors in specific setups. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, like those using finite volume or element approaches, are exploited to find Navier-Stokes solutions and carry out simulations. However, such methods require expensive hardware resources, relevant computational times, and manual efforts for the definition of dense meshes on which equations are evaluated iteratively for each time step of the simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are deep neural networks where physical laws are directly embedded into the training process, offer a promising approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations, thus alleviating hardware and time requirements. PINNs bypass some CFD limitations by using neural networks to produce solutions based on governing equations, thus reducing the need for large datasets, dense meshing, and iterative estimation over time. This paper evaluates the application of PINNs in near real-world scenarios, while considering various geometries. The study focuses on the achieved accuracy, by comparing PINN estimates with CFD solutions obtained via OpenFOAM, and the required training times; this includes evaluating different neural network architectures, activation functions, and numbers of sampling points. Additionally, several training strategies such as fine-tuning, multi-resolution learning, and parametrized training are proposed to enhance efficiency and obtain speed up. Results demonstrate that PINNs can achieve comparable accuracy to CFD methods (with a velocity magnitude mean absolute error inferior to <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>) and significantly reduce computational costs. Our findings demonstrated that with appropriate training techniques PINNs can be effectively used in industrial applications requiring rapid and accurate fluid dynamic simulations, thus paving the way for their broader adoption in practical engineering problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 110347"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625003471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Navier-Stokes equations used to model fluid dynamic processes are fundamental to address several real-world problems related to energy production, aerospace applications, automotive design, industrial process, etc. However, since in most cases they do not admit any analytical solution, numerical simulations are required in industrial contexts to assess fluid dynamic behaviors in specific setups. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, like those using finite volume or element approaches, are exploited to find Navier-Stokes solutions and carry out simulations. However, such methods require expensive hardware resources, relevant computational times, and manual efforts for the definition of dense meshes on which equations are evaluated iteratively for each time step of the simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are deep neural networks where physical laws are directly embedded into the training process, offer a promising approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations, thus alleviating hardware and time requirements. PINNs bypass some CFD limitations by using neural networks to produce solutions based on governing equations, thus reducing the need for large datasets, dense meshing, and iterative estimation over time. This paper evaluates the application of PINNs in near real-world scenarios, while considering various geometries. The study focuses on the achieved accuracy, by comparing PINN estimates with CFD solutions obtained via OpenFOAM, and the required training times; this includes evaluating different neural network architectures, activation functions, and numbers of sampling points. Additionally, several training strategies such as fine-tuning, multi-resolution learning, and parametrized training are proposed to enhance efficiency and obtain speed up. Results demonstrate that PINNs can achieve comparable accuracy to CFD methods (with a velocity magnitude mean absolute error inferior to 102) and significantly reduce computational costs. Our findings demonstrated that with appropriate training techniques PINNs can be effectively used in industrial applications requiring rapid and accurate fluid dynamic simulations, thus paving the way for their broader adoption in practical engineering problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
期刊最新文献
Investigate dual chiller characteristics and improve the performance by integrating machine learning and genetic algorithms Decoupled Graph Spatial-Temporal Transformer Networks for traffic flow forecasting A Dynamic Cross-Domain Recommendation Model with Target-Aware Complementary Preference Transfer and Information Fusion Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios Evaluation of medium-lift forest fire helicopter using q-rung orthopair fuzzy set based alternative ranking technique based on adaptive standardized intervals approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1