Validation of multi-model decadal simulations of present-day central European air-quality

IF 3.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121077
Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez, Peter Huszár, Jan Karlický
{"title":"Validation of multi-model decadal simulations of present-day central European air-quality","authors":"Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez,&nbsp;Peter Huszár,&nbsp;Jan Karlický","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although air quality has improved in Europe, most of its population is still exposed to levels of pollutants that are harmful to health, such as nitrogen dioxide (NO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) or sulphur dioxide (SO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>). Studying the processes that drive atmospheric chemistry is key to understanding their contribution to air quality. However, since many pollutants are secondary, since meteorology influences the chemical evolution of pollutants, disperses them and transport them and their precursors, among other factors, this task is extremely difficult. This makes thus the use of models essential for the study of air quality. In this work, we present the first long-term validation of air quality simulations in Central Europe for the 2010–2019 decade. The simulations were carried out using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx). Using the AirBase dataset, stations inside the model domain were classified into three categories according to their pollution burden, and the validation of the models was performed independently in each group. Our research shows that, generally, simulations underestimate pollutant concentrations – except ozone (O<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) – most likely because of an incorrect monthly and hourly emissions profile and an overestimation of vertical mixing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 121077"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025000524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although air quality has improved in Europe, most of its population is still exposed to levels of pollutants that are harmful to health, such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or sulphur dioxide (SO2). Studying the processes that drive atmospheric chemistry is key to understanding their contribution to air quality. However, since many pollutants are secondary, since meteorology influences the chemical evolution of pollutants, disperses them and transport them and their precursors, among other factors, this task is extremely difficult. This makes thus the use of models essential for the study of air quality. In this work, we present the first long-term validation of air quality simulations in Central Europe for the 2010–2019 decade. The simulations were carried out using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx). Using the AirBase dataset, stations inside the model domain were classified into three categories according to their pollution burden, and the validation of the models was performed independently in each group. Our research shows that, generally, simulations underestimate pollutant concentrations – except ozone (O3) – most likely because of an incorrect monthly and hourly emissions profile and an overestimation of vertical mixing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前中欧空气质量的多模式年代际模拟的验证
尽管欧洲的空气质量有所改善,但大多数人口仍然暴露在对健康有害的污染物水平下,如二氧化氮(NO2)或二氧化硫(SO2)。研究驱动大气化学的过程是了解它们对空气质量贡献的关键。然而,由于许多污染物是次生的,由于气象学影响污染物的化学演变、扩散和运输污染物及其前体,以及其他因素,这项任务极为困难。因此,模型的使用对于空气质量的研究至关重要。在这项工作中,我们首次对中欧2010-2019十年的空气质量模拟进行了长期验证。模拟使用天气研究与预报耦合化学模式(WRF-Chem)和综合空气质量扩展模式(CAMx)进行。利用AirBase数据集,将模型域内的站点根据其污染负担分为三类,并在每一组中独立进行模型验证。我们的研究表明,一般来说,模拟低估了污染物的浓度——臭氧(O3)除外——很可能是因为月度和每小时的排放曲线不正确,以及高估了垂直混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
NO2 pollutant in Chinese American kitchens with gas cooking Understanding historic origins and long-term trends of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Great Lakes atmosphere Continental-scale spatiotemporal assessment of atmospheric methane over Australia: Hotspot persistence and priority-area screening Gridded post-processing of air quality predictions based on the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model Multi-scale analysis of ozone pollution Shanghai based on meteorological normalization: A case study of multi-model collaborative machine learning framework and MCM coupling mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1