In-plane shear behaviour by diagonal-compression testing of damaged masonry walls strengthened with carbon-glass hybrid textile reinforced concrete

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120009
Fenghao Qu , Shiping Yin , Huarui Liu
{"title":"In-plane shear behaviour by diagonal-compression testing of damaged masonry walls strengthened with carbon-glass hybrid textile reinforced concrete","authors":"Fenghao Qu ,&nbsp;Shiping Yin ,&nbsp;Huarui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of masonry structures, walls—serving as the primary load-bearing components—exhibit significant susceptibility to damage during seismic events owing to their inherent brittleness. To enhance the shear performance of damaged walls, diagonal compression tests were performed on damaged specimens reinforced with textile reinforced concrete (TRC). This study meticulously examines various factors, including the extent of damage, reinforcement strategies, the number of textile layers, and the anchoring of the surface layer, while exploring the mechanisms through which TRC enhances the shear performance of damaged walls. The findings indicate that post-repair specimens predominantly exhibited diagonal tensile failures. Repairs utilizing a single-sided, two-layer textile demonstrated a degree of out-of-plane bending, whereas dual-sided reinforcement produced the most pronounced improvements in performance. Moreover, the shear strength, ductility, and energy dissipation exhibited significant enhancements within a specific range as the number of textile layers increased. Notably, improvements in mechanical performance parameters were modest in severely damaged specimens, whereas they remained comparable between slightly damaged and intact specimens. Anchoring effectively alleviated the out-of-plane bending associated with single-sided repairs, thereby enhancing shear performance. Ultimately, a comparative analysis of the experimental results against analytical models for reinforced walls demonstrated that the ACI 549.6R-20 calculation method aligns closely with the experimental data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 120009"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625004006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of masonry structures, walls—serving as the primary load-bearing components—exhibit significant susceptibility to damage during seismic events owing to their inherent brittleness. To enhance the shear performance of damaged walls, diagonal compression tests were performed on damaged specimens reinforced with textile reinforced concrete (TRC). This study meticulously examines various factors, including the extent of damage, reinforcement strategies, the number of textile layers, and the anchoring of the surface layer, while exploring the mechanisms through which TRC enhances the shear performance of damaged walls. The findings indicate that post-repair specimens predominantly exhibited diagonal tensile failures. Repairs utilizing a single-sided, two-layer textile demonstrated a degree of out-of-plane bending, whereas dual-sided reinforcement produced the most pronounced improvements in performance. Moreover, the shear strength, ductility, and energy dissipation exhibited significant enhancements within a specific range as the number of textile layers increased. Notably, improvements in mechanical performance parameters were modest in severely damaged specimens, whereas they remained comparable between slightly damaged and intact specimens. Anchoring effectively alleviated the out-of-plane bending associated with single-sided repairs, thereby enhancing shear performance. Ultimately, a comparative analysis of the experimental results against analytical models for reinforced walls demonstrated that the ACI 549.6R-20 calculation method aligns closely with the experimental data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
A data-driven approach for predicting peak floor response based on visually observed rocking behaviors of freestanding NSCs Vibration source characteristics and vibration reduction mechanism of the novel rubber pad floating slab track in metro turnout areas Crack width simulation with discrete reinforcement and 3D nonlinear finite element models Seismic experimental research on damaged resilient reinforced concrete columns retrofitted by FRP sheets Machine learning-based and interpretable models for predicting the resistance and probability of progressive collapse of steel frame-composite floor structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1